FR 2024-28916

Overview

Title

Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Appraisal Subcommittee had a secret meeting on their computers to talk about something related to someone's job, and they didn't decide to do anything at the meeting.

Summary AI

The Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council held a special closed meeting on October 23, 2024. This meeting, conducted virtually via Teams, focused on discussing a personnel matter, as authorized under section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989. No actions were taken during this meeting.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 99260
Document #: 2024-28916
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 99260-99260

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice about a special closed meeting of the Appraisal Subcommittee, a part of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. This meeting was held on October 23, 2024, in a virtual format through Teams. The primary focus of this meeting was to discuss a 'personnel matter.' Under the laws governing the committee, specifically the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, such matters can be discussed in closed meetings to likely protect confidentiality. Importantly, no action was taken during this meeting.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several areas within the document that raise questions or could be of concern:

  1. Lack of Abstract: The absence of an abstract makes it challenging for readers to grasp quickly the overarching purpose and outcomes of the meeting. While this might not be unusual for a general notice, it can hinder understanding for those seeking specific information fast.

  2. Transparency: Although personnel matters are often confidential, the lack of detailed information about the matter discussed may lead to concerns about transparency. The document does not specify what the personnel issue entailed or why it necessitated a special meeting.

  3. Technical Language: The document references statutory provisions such as "section 1104(b) of title XI" and "12 U.S.C. 3333(b)" without further explanation. This reference might not be immediately clear to individuals unfamiliar with legal statutes, limiting public comprehension of the meeting's legal basis.

  4. Outcome of the Meeting: The notice states that no actions were taken during the meeting. This lack of resolution or outcome may prompt questions about the meeting’s efficacy or the necessity of convening it if no decisions were reached.

  5. Security Concerns: The meeting's virtual nature, conducted via the Microsoft Teams platform, raises potential concerns about how confidentiality and security were maintained during discussions about sensitive personnel matters.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The general public may view this document as a routine procedural announcement with minimal immediate impact on their daily lives. However, for those interested in the workings of the Appraisal Subcommittee or involved in federal financial institutions, the notice provides insight into the committee's internal operations and decision-making processes.

For specific stakeholders, such as the employees of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council or members of the Appraisal Subcommittee, understanding that a personnel matter was significant enough to warrant a special meeting could imply changes or considerations happening internally. The fact that the meeting concluded without action could either suggest that further discussions are needed, or that the issue was resolved without formal decisions, impacting employees involved indirectly or directly.

In summary, while the document reveals the procedural side of the Appraisal Subcommittee's operations, it leaves some questions unanswered regarding transparency and decision-making processes. These aspects could influence perceptions of accountability within the institution.

Issues

  • • The document lacks an abstract, which makes it difficult for a reader to quickly understand the purpose or outcomes of the meeting.

  • • There is no information provided on the nature of the 'personnel matter' discussed, which might be a transparency issue. However, this could be understandable if confidentiality is required for personnel issues.

  • • The use of technical references such as 'section 1104(b) of title XI' and '12 U.S.C. 3333(b)' without a brief explanation might make it difficult for individuals not familiar with legal statutes to understand the significance and authority of the cited rule.

  • • No details are provided on why no action was taken during the meeting, which could leave the reader questioning the efficacy or purpose of the meeting.

  • • The document mentions that the meeting was virtual via Teams, but there is no information on how the platform ensures confidentiality and security given that personnel matters were discussed.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 183
Sentences: 11
Entities: 23

Language

Nouns: 67
Verbs: 7
Adjectives: 4
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 16

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.65
Average Sentence Length:
16.64
Token Entropy:
4.41
Readability (ARI):
11.62

Reading Time

less than a minute