FR 2024-28829

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Monthly Certification of On-The-Job and Apprenticeship Training

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Veterans Benefits Administration wants to change a form that helps decide how much money someone gets when they are learning a job or skill. They no longer need the learner to sign the form, and they want to know what people think about this change.

Summary AI

The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs has announced that it will submit an information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The information collection, titled "Monthly Certification of On-The-Job and Apprenticeship Training," uses VA Forms 22-6553d-1 and 22-6553d to determine benefits based on the trainee's hours worked, verified by the training establishment. The submission is a revision of a currently approved collection and is no longer required to be signed by the trainee due to amendments made by the Veterans Apprenticeship and Labor Opportunity Reform Act. The VBA invites comments on this information collection within 30 days of the notice's publication date.

Abstract

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, will submit the collection of information abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and burden, and it includes the actual data collection instrument.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 97707
Document #: 2024-28829
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 97707-97708

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The document is an official notice from the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), a part of the Department of Veterans Affairs. It announces the submission of an information collection activity to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval, adhering to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This collection involves the "Monthly Certification of On-The-Job and Apprenticeship Training" utilizing specific VA forms to determine veterans' benefits based on their training hours. Notably, a previous requirement for trainees to certify their hours has been removed due to legislative changes from the Veterans Apprenticeship and Labor Opportunity Reform Act.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document presents several significant issues and concerns:

  1. Complex Legal References: The document includes numerous references to laws and regulations, which may be challenging for individuals who aren't familiar with legal jargon. This complexity could hinder a broader understanding among the public.

  2. Lack of Cost Details: Despite mentioning the information collection's expected cost and burden, the document lacks detailed financial transparency. Readers might find insufficient information about federal spending accountability concerning this program.

  3. Ambiguity in Benefit Reduction: The criteria for benefit reduction, such as "unscheduled terminations" or deviations from a "full-time work schedule," are not clearly defined. This ambiguity could lead to confusion among stakeholders regarding when and how benefits might be adjusted or terminated.

  4. Implications of Process Changes: The elimination of the trainee's need to certify their hours could lead to concerns about oversight. Without trainee verification, questions about the accuracy and accountability of the reports submitted by training establishments could arise.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document forecasts changes that might ease the administrative burden on veterans undergoing on-the-job or apprenticeship training, given the removal of the certification requirement. This simplification could potentially speed up the benefits process, reducing delays caused by paperwork.

However, any gaps in accountability could affect the reliability of reported data and, consequently, the equitable distribution of benefits. This lack of transparency might foster skepticism among veterans and other stakeholders regarding the system's integrity.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For veterans participating in training programs, the revised process could mean fewer administrative hurdles, allowing them to focus more on their training without extra certification paperwork. On the downside, the lack of a requirement for trainee signatures may result in errors or discrepancies not being identified until after benefits are affected.

Training establishments are another stakeholder group that will experience a change. The onus of accurate reporting now falls more heavily on these establishments, which could increase their administrative responsibilities. While this might streamline processes for veterans, it also places more pressure on training establishments to maintain accurate records.

Overall, while the intent of these changes is to simplify and expedite benefit distribution, careful attention should be paid to ensuring accountability and transparency to safeguard the interests of all involved parties.

Issues

  • • The document relies heavily on legal references and regulations, which may be difficult for individuals without a legal background to fully understand.

  • • There is no detailed explanation of the expected cost involved in the information collection activity, which might pose concerns for transparency and accountability in federal spending.

  • • The document does not specify any particular beneficiaries of the spending, leaving ambiguity regarding potential favoritism towards specific organizations or individuals.

  • • The description of the reduction or termination of benefits is somewhat unclear, especially regarding what constitutes 'unscheduled terminations' or 'less than a full-time work schedule.'

  • • The phrase 'eliminate the trainee's certification requirement' could be confusing without broader context as to its implications on the process.

  • • The removal of the trainee's signature requirement could raise concerns about verification and accountability in the reporting process.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 609
Sentences: 28
Entities: 48

Language

Nouns: 209
Verbs: 44
Adjectives: 6
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 42

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.32
Average Sentence Length:
21.75
Token Entropy:
5.06
Readability (ARI):
17.70

Reading Time

about 2 minutes