FR 2024-28766

Overview

Title

Proposed Information Collection Activity; Electronic Document Exchange (Office of Management and Budget #: 0970-0435)

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Office of Child Support Services wants to keep using a special computer system that helps them share important papers with people who work on helping families, and they are asking for people's opinions on how small changes to this system might help. They want folks to share their thoughts by early 2025 about how they use this system and what they think about the changes.

Summary AI

The Office of Child Support Services (OCSS), part of the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), is asking for public comments on changes to the Electronic Document Exchange (EDE). The EDE is used by state child support agencies to share case information more efficiently and securely. They want to renew this system with minor updates for another three years. Comments on this proposal are open until February 7, 2025, and they encourage feedback on the necessity and effectiveness of the information collection.

Abstract

The Office of Child Support Services (OCSS), Administration for Children and Families (ACF), is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve the Electronic Document Exchange (EDE), with minor revisions, for an additional three years. State child support agencies (CSAs) use the EDE to improve case processing. The current OMB approval expires on June 30, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 97621
Document #: 2024-28766
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 97621-97622

AnalysisAI

The document at hand is a notice from the Office of Child Support Services (OCSS), part of the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), situated under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It announces a request for public comments on the renewal and minor revisions of the Electronic Document Exchange (EDE) system. This system is currently used by state child support agencies to facilitate more efficient and secure information sharing regarding child and spousal support cases. The approval of the system by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) was due to expire in 2025, and the OCSS is seeking to renew it for another three years, with public comments being accepted until early February 2025.

General Summary

The notice is essentially a call for public involvement in the decision-making process related to the EDE system. State agencies use EDE to improve the processing of child support cases, and the proposed renewal seeks to continue this practice, with some unspecified “minor revisions.” The changes are intended to improve functionality and security, as well as to standardize data sharing across state lines.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several issues and concerns that arise from the notice:

  • Lack of Cost Information: The document does not specify any financial cost associated with the EDE system. This omission makes it challenging to evaluate whether the spending is appropriate or if there is a financial preference towards specific contractors or entities involved.

  • Technical Language: The language used throughout the notice tends to be technical. The document discusses legal authorities and the functionalities of the EDE in a manner that may not be readily accessible to the general public, which could limit effective public participation.

  • Ambiguity in Revisions: The term “minor revisions” is not elaborated upon, leaving stakeholders without a clear understanding of what these changes entail. Details about these revisions are important for stakeholders who may be affected by the proposed changes.

  • Utilization of Public Comments: The notice does not clarify how the public comments will be used, or what specific outcomes they may influence in the EDE proposal. Understanding the process and potential impact of public feedback is crucial for encouraging meaningful participation.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, particularly individuals relying on child and spousal support, the document outlines the framework for a system intended to enhance efficiency in processing support cases across state lines. However, without detailed information on revisions and costs, it's difficult for the public to fully grasp the implications or weigh in effectively.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

State Child Support Agencies (CSAs): These are the primary entities affected by the renewal of the EDE system. They stand to benefit from the continued use of a secure and standardized system, which should ideally lead to faster and more reliable exchanges of information.

Families and Individuals Receiving Support: These parties may experience improved support outcomes due to faster processing times facilitated by EDE. However, without clarity on the “minor revisions,” there could be an unknown impact on how cases are processed or prioritized.

Policymakers and Legislators: They need to consider the feedback gathered during the comment period to guide appropriate legislative or regulatory measures that support the effective implementation and oversight of the EDE system.

While the document opens the door for public engagement in the upcoming changes to the EDE, it leaves much to be clarified regarding specific details of the revisions and how public feedback will shape the final decisions. The general public, including those directly impacted, would benefit from greater transparency and a clearer explanation of the expected impacts on stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify any specific financial cost associated with the Electronic Document Exchange (EDE), which makes it difficult to assess if any spending is wasteful or if there is any financial bias towards particular organizations.

  • • The document's language is largely technical and may not be easily understood by the general public, especially in sections discussing specific legal authorities and technical functionalities of the EDE.

  • • There might be ambiguity in 'minor revisions' without specifying what these are, which could be important for stakeholders to understand potential impacts.

  • • The document lacks detail on how public comments will be utilized or what specific outcomes they may influence concerning the EDE proposal.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 502
Sentences: 17
Entities: 29

Language

Nouns: 184
Verbs: 38
Adjectives: 19
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 19

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.00
Average Sentence Length:
29.53
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
20.31

Reading Time

about a minute or two