FR 2024-28681

Overview

Title

South Carolina; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government said there was a big storm in South Carolina called Tropical Storm Debby, so they will help fix things by giving some money, but not all of it—only about three-quarters. Someone named Brett is in charge of this help.

Summary AI

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a notice regarding the Presidential declaration of a major disaster in South Carolina due to Tropical Storm Debby, which occurred from August 4 to August 22, 2024. FEMA will provide federal disaster assistance for public assistance projects in specified counties and hazard mitigation throughout the state. The federal assistance will cover up to 75% of the total eligible costs. Brett H. Howard has been appointed as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

Abstract

This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4835-DR), dated September 29, 2024, and related determinations.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 97051
Document #: 2024-28681
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 97051-97052

AnalysisAI

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued a notice declaring a major disaster in South Carolina as a result of Tropical Storm Debby, which occurred from August 4 to August 22, 2024. The notice outlines the provision of federal assistance for disaster recovery efforts, specifically for public assistance projects in several designated counties and hazard mitigation statewide. The federal assistance is set to cover up to 75% of the total eligible costs, meaning that state and local governments will need to cover the remaining 25%.


General Summary

This document, published in the Federal Register, announces the Presidential declaration of a major disaster in South Carolina due to the impacts of Tropical Storm Debby. The document, dated December 6, 2024, describes the areas eligible for federal disaster aid, the type of assistance available, and the administrative appointments made to coordinate the response effort.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Coverage Limitation
One of the noteworthy aspects of this notice is that federal funds will only cover 75% of the eligible costs associated with public assistance and hazard mitigation. This requirement could significantly strain state and local budgets, as they will be responsible for the remaining costs. This could be challenging, especially for areas already facing financial difficulties.

Lack of Specificity in Criteria
The document does not provide detailed criteria or metrics outlining how the severity and magnitude of the disaster were assessed. Greater transparency and clarity on this aspect could enhance public understanding of how disaster declarations are determined.

Oversight and Auditing
There is no mention of any measures for oversight or the auditing process to ensure that the allocated funds are used appropriately and effectively. Without such mechanisms in place, there might be concerns about the proper use and distribution of funds.

Technical Complexity
The document employs technical terminology and several references that might not be easily accessible to the general public. Terms like "Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act" and various "CFDA numbers" (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) are used without explanation, potentially making the notice less accessible to those without specialized knowledge.

Repetition and Clarity
There is a repetition in the text regarding authorization to make changes to the declaration as per the Stafford Act. This might create confusion or ambiguity regarding the flexibility and scope of authority in disaster response modifications.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

General Public Impact
For the general public, particularly those residing in the designated counties, this notice signifies potential federal support for recovery efforts. However, given the financial limitations placed on aid, citizens may experience delays or reduced services if state and local authorities struggle to cover their portion of the costs.

Specific Stakeholder Impact
For state and local governments, the requirement to cover 25% of disaster-related costs represents a substantial financial commitment. For residents in the affected areas, the announcement of assistance might bring some relief. However, those living outside the specified counties may feel marginalized if they, too, experienced damage.

Additionally, the appointment of Brett H. Howard as the Federal Coordinating Officer could influence the coordination effectiveness, with his role being crucial in ensuring the assistance is delivered appropriately and efficiently.

In conclusion, while the federal recognition of disaster in South Carolina facilitates the allocation of funds and resources to affected areas, several underlying issues concerning coverage limitations, transparency, and the complexity of information warrant closer attention to optimize recovery efforts and public confidence in government response systems.

Issues

  • • The notice indicates that only 75 percent of the total eligible costs will be covered by Federal funds for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation, which might place a significant financial burden on the state and local governments.

  • • The document does not provide specific details or criteria used to determine the severity and magnitude of the damage that warranted the major disaster declaration.

  • • There is no mention of any oversight or auditing process to ensure the funds are allocated and used appropriately.

  • • The list of counties designated for Public Assistance does not specify the extent of damage or needs in those areas, potentially leaving out useful context for understanding the allocation of resources.

  • • There is repetition in the text ('Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act.'), which could cause confusion.

  • • The document uses several technical terms and references (e.g., 'Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act', CFDA numbers) without explanations, which may not be accessible to general readers.

  • • The document references multiple CFDA numbers for various assistance programs without detailing how these programs interrelate or prioritization measures.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 682
Sentences: 23
Entities: 87

Language

Nouns: 256
Verbs: 42
Adjectives: 29
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 38

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.93
Average Sentence Length:
29.65
Token Entropy:
4.93
Readability (ARI):
20.01

Reading Time

about 2 minutes