FR 2024-28644

Overview

Title

Alabama; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government said that a storm emergency in Alabama is over now, and they're offering special help programs to fix things, like giving out money and offering counseling. Dean Webster from FEMA can explain more if people have questions.

Summary AI

The Federal Emergency Management Agency issued a notice amending the emergency declaration for Alabama originally declared on September 26, 2024. This amendment officially closes the incident period as of September 29, 2024. It includes a list of federal assistance programs for reporting and fund withdrawal, such as Community Disaster Loans and Crisis Counseling. The responsible contact for further information is Dean Webster from FEMA's Office of Response and Recovery.

Abstract

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-3618-EM), dated September 26, 2024, and related determinations.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 97060
Document #: 2024-28644
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 97060-97060

AnalysisAI

The document in question is an official notice from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), part of the Department of Homeland Security, regarding a revision to an earlier emergency declaration for the state of Alabama. Originally declared on September 26, 2024, this amendment specifies that the official incident period concluded on September 29, 2024.

General Summary

FEMA published this notice to amend the emergency declaration related to an unspecified event in Alabama. The amendment effectively closes the incident period, signaling the end of any further immediate federal emergency response actions related to this particular declaration. The document also lists various federal programs under specific Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) numbers, which are intended for use in reporting and drawing federal funds in response to the emergency.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues emerge from this document. First, it lacks transparency regarding the nature of the emergency, which is vital for public understanding and assessing the appropriateness of the agency's response. Without this information, stakeholders may question whether the emergency declaration was justified or properly scoped.

Furthermore, the document includes a list of assistance programs identified by CFDA numbers, yet it provides no context or explanation about these programs. This technical jargon can be confusing for the general public, potentially leading to misunderstandings about the types of assistance available.

Another concern is the absence of details on funding amounts or the criteria for the distribution of these funds. This lack of specificity could raise issues of oversight and accountability, making it difficult to ensure that the resources are allocated effectively and equitably. Additionally, there is no mention of mechanisms to evaluate the efficiency or impact of these funds, leaving a gap in ensuring program effectiveness.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document may hold limited immediate relevance beyond the affected region; however, for residents of Alabama, it marks an important end to a presumably significant event. They might benefit from knowing that the federal government has potentially provided avenues for assistance, though understanding and accessing this help could prove challenging due to the lack of clarity in the document.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The stakeholders, which include local government officials, emergency responders, and affected residents, may find both positive and negative implications in this document. On the positive side, the amendment signifies a step toward recovery, with various federal programs possibly deploying resources to aid this process.

However, the non-specific nature of the listed programs might negatively impact stakeholders aiming to leverage available resources effectively. Without clear communication about program details and access procedures, beneficiaries might not fully realize the potential support. Moreover, those responsible for managing and distributing these funds could face difficulties ensuring appropriate and timely aid delivery due to the uncertainties outlined in the amendment.

In conclusion, while the notice addresses procedural elements necessary for federal response management, its vagueness could hinder public understanding and effective aid execution, highlighting a recurring challenge in governmental communications regarding emergency responses.

Issues

  • • The document provides a list of Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) for various programs, but it does not specify the amounts allocated or the criteria for distribution, which might lead to concerns about oversight and accountability.

  • • The document does not indicate the nature of the emergency that led to the declaration, which could make it difficult to assess the appropriateness of the response and related funding.

  • • The use of technical terminology like CFDA numbers and specific program names may be difficult for laypeople to understand without additional context or explanation.

  • • There is no clear indication of how the effectiveness and efficiency of the funds used under these programs will be evaluated.

  • • The document lists several specific types of assistance under CFDA numbers but does not explain what each program entails, which could lead to misunderstandings regarding the scope and purpose of the assistance.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 288
Sentences: 10
Entities: 47

Language

Nouns: 114
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 5
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 30

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.58
Average Sentence Length:
28.80
Token Entropy:
4.50
Readability (ARI):
17.34

Reading Time

about a minute or two