FR 2024-28615

Overview

Title

Proposed Prospective Purchaser Agreement for the Brandon Road Interbasin Project Site in Joliet, Illinois

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA wants to make a deal with Illinois for a special project in Joliet, Illinois. They need people to check the land for bad stuff like dirty dirt or water, clean it up, and are asking everyone to share their thoughts on this plan.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing a proposed settlement agreement for the acquisition of a property by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources as part of the Brandon Road Interbasin Project in Joliet, Illinois. This settlement requires the party acquiring the property to enroll it in the Illinois Site Remediation Program, conduct investigations for soil and groundwater contamination, and perform necessary cleanup actions. The EPA is asking for public comments on this agreement until January 8, 2025, and will consider all feedback received before finalizing the agreement.

Abstract

In accordance with the Prospective Purchaser Agreement, notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement concerning the property to be used in the Brandon Road Interbasin Project with the following Settling Party: Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The Settling Party intends to acquire title to an approximately 2.32-acre portion of the property at 1800 Channahon Road, Joliet, Illinois, which is adjacent to the Joliet 29 Generating Station and borders the Brandon Road Lock and Dam.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 97609
Document #: 2024-28615
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 97609-97610

AnalysisAI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a notice regarding a proposed settlement agreement involving the acquisition of a 2.32-acre property by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) in Joliet, Illinois. This property forms part of the Brandon Road Interbasin Project. The agreement mandates the IDNR to enroll the property in the Illinois Site Remediation Program (Illinois SRP), conduct thorough investigations to detect any contamination in soil and groundwater, and undertake necessary cleanup activities. The EPA is currently inviting public comments on this proposal, with a submission deadline of January 8, 2025.

General Summary

As part of efforts to manage the Brandon Road Interbasin Project in Joliet, the EPA has put forward a settlement that defines how the prospective land acquisition should proceed, including measures to address environmental concerns. It specifically requires the Illinois Department of Natural Resources to conduct environmental cleanup and remediation actions to tackle any contamination present at the site.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from this document that may warrant attention:

  1. Lack of Cost Details: The notice does not provide information regarding the financial implications for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, leaving questions about the resources required for this agreement and the financial burden it may impose on the agency and taxpayers.

  2. Liability and Risk: The document mentions protections related to "Existing Contamination," which may shield the involved parties from certain liabilities. However, it does not clearly outline potential future risks or liabilities that could arise from these protections.

  3. Complex Terminology: Technical references such as "Illinois Site Remediation Program" and legislative acts like the "Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act" may be difficult for the general public to understand without additional explanation.

  4. Public Comment Process: While public comments are invited, the document does not detail how these comments might impact the final agreement. There is a lack of transparency concerning the process for modifying the settlement if significant concerns are raised.

  5. Submission Preferences: Although various methods for submitting comments are mentioned, the document does not clarify which method is most preferred beyond indicating a general preference for online submissions, potentially causing confusion for the public.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly speaking, this proposal could carry significant environmental implications. Success in identifying and mitigating contamination would likely benefit the local environment and public health. However, without clarity on financial aspects, the community might be concerned about potential tax impacts or resource allocation by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources.

For stakeholders specifically involved, such as local residents, environmental groups, and businesses near the site, the agreement presents both positive and negative possibilities. On one hand, effective remediation could enhance property values, mitigate environmental concerns, and provide assurances against potential contamination risks. On the other, there may be concern over the adequacy of the planned remediation efforts and the sufficiency of resources dedicated to addressing these issues.

Ultimately, the engagement of the public in providing comments is crucial and can substantially influence how the proposed settlement is perceived and perhaps modified. The EPA's actions and stakeholders' feedback could ensure a balanced approach that maximizes environmental and community benefits while mitigating economic and logistical concerns.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the total cost of the settlement or the expected budgetary implications for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, which could be a point of concern regarding resource allocation and spending.

  • • The document's reference to 'Existing Contamination' and related legal protections might limit liability for pre-existing conditions but is not fully transparent on potential future risks or liabilities, which could be concerning to stakeholders.

  • • Technical terms such as 'Illinois Site Remediation Program,' 'No Further Remediation Letter,' and 'Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act' are referenced but may be difficult to understand for laypersons without further explanation.

  • • There is no detailed explanation on how the public's comments will influence the final decision and the process for modifying the agreement if significant issues are raised, which could lead to ambiguity regarding the public's role in decision-making.

  • • The document mentions multiple methods for submitting comments but does not specify any prioritization or preference beyond 'our preferred method,' which could lead to confusion about the most effective way to submit opinions.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,031
Sentences: 32
Entities: 83

Language

Nouns: 366
Verbs: 93
Adjectives: 41
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.35
Average Sentence Length:
32.22
Token Entropy:
5.30
Readability (ARI):
23.46

Reading Time

about 4 minutes