Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government is checking and sharing updates about prices that big companies want to charge for using special gas pipes. People can say what they think about these updates, and there is help available if they want to join in and share their opinions.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission received several new and existing natural gas pipeline rate and refund report filings from various companies, including Iroquois Gas Transmission System, TransColorado Gas Transmission, and Mojave Pipeline Company. These filings, dated November 27 and 29, 2024, detail tariff updates and negotiated rate agreements set to take effect in late 2024 and early 2025. The public is invited to submit comments or motions to intervene by the specified deadlines. For those interested in engaging with the proceedings, the Commission provides resources to assist with accessing information and submitting comments or interventions.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Document
The document is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, published in the Federal Register, detailing recent filings from various natural gas pipeline companies. These filings include updates to natural gas pipeline rates, negotiated rate agreements, and other tariff modifications. The filings were made at the end of November 2024 and are set to take effect either late in 2024 or early 2025. The public is invited to participate in these proceedings by submitting comments or motions to intervene by specific deadlines.
Issues and Concerns
One significant concern with the document is its reliance on technical language and specific regulatory references. Terms like "eTariff Filing" and "§ 4(d) Rate Filing" are used throughout, which may not be readily understandable to individuals without prior knowledge of energy regulation. Additionally, the document references several rules of the Commission's regulations, which might be challenging for those unfamiliar with legal and regulatory procedures to interpret. This could limit meaningful public participation, as people may find it difficult to understand the implications of these filings without further explanation or context.
Another issue is the lack of detailed information regarding the financial impacts or justifications for these rate filings. Without a clear explanation of why these changes are being proposed, it is challenging for stakeholders to assess whether the adjustments are necessary or if they could lead to unnecessary expenses.
Public Impact
For the general public, especially consumers of natural gas, these filings may have indirect effects such as changes in the cost of natural gas. However, the document does not specify how these changes might influence consumer prices, leaving individuals without a clear understanding of the potential impacts on their utility bills.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders such as landowners, environmental justice communities, and Tribal members, the document may impact them more directly if the rate changes affect pipeline construction or maintenance projects that involve their land or resources. For such stakeholders, understanding these proceedings is crucial, yet the document does not offer much detail on potential impacts.
The document indicates that the Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports public engagement, which is a positive step toward increasing transparency and involvement. However, the document stops short of explaining how OPP can assist laypersons in navigating these complex processes, potentially limiting its effectiveness for those needing guidance.
Conclusion
Overall, while the document fulfills its role as a formal notice of pipeline filings, it could benefit from clearer explanations of what these changes entail and how they might affect the public and specific stakeholder groups. Providing more accessible information would facilitate better public understanding and engagement, ensuring that all interested parties can meaningfully participate in the regulatory process.
Issues
• The document contains multiple rate filings and proceedings, but it does not provide any specific information on potential financial impacts or justifications for these filings, making it difficult to assess if any spending might be wasteful.
• The language and terminology used (e.g., 'eTariff Filing', '4(d) Rate Filing', 'Negotiated Rate Agreements') might be difficult for a layperson to understand without additional context or definitions.
• The document relies heavily on specialized legal and regulatory references (e.g., Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations) without explanation, which might be challenging for non-expert stakeholders to navigate.
• The document lists specific comment and filing dates, but does not clarify the significance or implications of missing these dates for interested parties.
• The document briefly mentions the role of the Commission's Office of Public Participation but does not elaborate on how it practically supports public engagement.