FR 2024-28532

Overview

Title

Evergy Kansas Central, Inc., Kansas Central, Inc., Evergy Kansas Central, Inc., Evergy Kansas South, Inc., Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Evergy Metro Inc., Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Notice of Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is checking if the money charged by some Evergy companies for using their equipment is fair. They set a date for possibly giving refunds if they find any issues by November 29, 2024, and people can join in to share their thoughts if they do so within 21 days.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has started an investigation into whether the depreciation rates proposed by Evergy Kansas Central, Inc., Evergy Kansas South, Inc., and Evergy Metro, Inc. are unfair or illegal. As part of this investigation, on November 29, 2024, the Commission set a refund effective date aligned with the publication of the notice in the Federal Register. If people want to be involved in this case, they need to file a notice within 21 days. The Commission encourages using its online resources for accessing documents and submitting filings.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 96956
Document #: 2024-28532
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 96956-96957

AnalysisAI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a notice regarding the initiation of an investigation into the proposed depreciation rates by Evergy Kansas Central, Inc., Evergy Kansas South, Inc., and Evergy Metro, Inc. This notice, published in the Federal Register, indicates that these rates could potentially be unfair or not compliant with federal regulations. The investigation seeks to determine whether these companies' depreciation rates are unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory, or otherwise unlawful.

General Summary

The commission formally started this inquiry on November 29, 2024, under Docket No. EL25-19-000 and has set the refund effective date as the date of publication in the Federal Register. This procedural choice aligns the timing of potential refunds to coincide with public notification, ensuring transparency in the process. The notice also outlines the procedure for interested parties to intervene, requiring them to file a motion within 21 days.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document that may affect stakeholders and the process:

  • Lack of Specific Details: The notice does not clarify what specific changes or considerations are involved in the depreciation rates, leaving a broad scope that may create uncertainty among stakeholders about how they might be affected.

  • Complex Intervention Process: The process for filing an intervention appears layered and possibly convoluted, which may deter participation from individuals or organizations unfamiliar with regulatory procedures. Simplifying or clearly outlining these steps would help ensure broader public involvement.

  • Multiple Contact Points: The document provides several email addresses and phone numbers for assistance, which could be streamlined to avoid confusion and improve accessibility for stakeholders seeking information or aid.

  • Digital Accessibility: While the commission encourages electronic fillings, it's essential to recognize that not all stakeholders may have sufficient access to the internet or the requisite technological skills, potentially limiting participation.

  • Lack of Impact Clarification: There is no specific mention of how the outcomes of this investigation will affect consumers, nor are criteria for judging whether a rate is unjust or unreasonable clearly defined. This gap leaves customers and other interested parties uncertain about potential consequences.

Broad Public Impact

The outcome of this investigation has the potential to influence power costs and services in significant ways. If the depreciation rates are deemed unjust and require adjustments, there could be financial impacts on both the companies involved and their customers. This could mean refunds or future rate adjustments that impact consumer electricity bills.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For consumers, particularly those served by these companies, changes to the depreciation rates could either result in financial relief or added costs depending upon how the findings align with existing charges.

Companies involved in the investigation may face reputational risks or financial impacts, depending on the outcomes. The findings could require them to adjust financial practices or provide refunds, impacting their financial planning and operations.

For regulatory bodies and legal professionals, the document presents an opportunity to analyze the fairness of utility depreciation rates and ensure compliance with the Federal Power Act. Their engagement in this process will be critical in maintaining fair practices.

The document essentially opens a critical dialogue on how energy service providers calculate depreciation rates and the broader implications these calculations have on fairness and legality. By encouraging public participation, FERC aims to ensure that various stakeholder voices, including those from marginalized communities, are heard in these regulatory processes.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details on the potential adjustments to the depreciation rates, which may lead to ambiguity regarding the scope and impact of the investigation.

  • • The process for interested persons to intervene is complex and involves multiple steps, which could be simplified or clarified for easier understanding.

  • • The use of multiple contact emails and phone numbers could be consolidated to prevent confusion among stakeholders seeking assistance or information.

  • • The document references a mechanism for electronic filing that may not be accessible to all stakeholders, particularly those without internet access or technological proficiency.

  • • No explicit mention of how the investigation outcome will impact customers or the specific criteria for determining if the rates are unjust or unreasonable, leaving stakeholders uncertain about the potential consequences.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 673
Sentences: 21
Entities: 79

Language

Nouns: 233
Verbs: 39
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 52

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.91
Average Sentence Length:
32.05
Token Entropy:
5.05
Readability (ARI):
21.12

Reading Time

about 2 minutes