FR 2024-28522

Overview

Title

Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Reserve Board wants people to share their thoughts about a plan to keep collecting important money data from big banks for three more years. They're asking if this collection is still needed and how it can be less troublesome for banks that have to report this information.

Summary AI

The Federal Reserve Board is seeking public comments on a proposal to extend the information collection known as the Report of Institution-to-Aggregate Granular Data on Assets and Liabilities (FR 2510) for another three years without changes. This report collects detailed data on the financial positions of large banking organizations, such as their assets, liabilities, and derivatives, which help the Board monitor the systemic impact of these institutions. Comments on whether the information collection is necessary, as well as suggestions to improve its quality or reduce its burden, are requested by February 4, 2025. The Board may adjust the proposal based on feedback received during this comment period.

Abstract

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) invites comment on a proposal to extend for three years, without revision, the Report of Institution-to-Aggregate Granular Data on Assets and Liabilities on an Immediate Counterparty Basis (FR 2510; OMB No. 7100-0376).

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 96975
Document #: 2024-28522
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 96975-96976

AnalysisAI

The Federal Reserve Board is proposing to extend, for three years, the collection of information known as the Report of Institution-to-Aggregate Granular Data on Assets and Liabilities (FR 2510). This extension involves no changes to the current reporting requirements. The FR 2510 report collects detailed financial data from large banking organizations, focusing on their assets, liabilities, and derivatives. The primary aim of this data collection is to enable the Board to closely examine the financial health of these institutions and assess their impact on the U.S. financial system.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from this proposal. Firstly, the document mentions a potential format update for the FR 2510 instructions—from a two-column to a one-column layout—but provides no justification or explanation of the necessity or cost-effectiveness of this change. This raises questions about whether such a modification is truly warranted and what benefits it might provide.

Another issue involves the lack of information on the cost implications of extending the FR 2510 for three years. Understanding the financial and resource commitment required for this extension is vital for effective budgeting and resource allocation.

Additionally, the quarterly reporting requirement could be burdensome for the banks involved, especially smaller-sized institutions. The document does not mention any measures to support these respondents or reduce this potential burden.

While public comments are invited, the document does not detail how these comments will influence the decision-making process, nor does it assure stakeholders that their feedback will be acknowledged or incorporated into final outcomes. This could affect the transparency and trust in the comment process.

Moreover, the document states that public comments will be disclosed, yet it does not address how confidential business information submitted by commenters will be protected. This lack of protection may discourage individuals from providing full and honest feedback, undermining the engagement process.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

The proposed extension of the FR 2510 has broad implications for the financial community and the general public. The information collected plays a crucial role in monitoring the systemic risks posed by large financial institutions, which, in turn, affects economic stability. This stability is significant for the general public, as it impacts everything from personal savings to broader economic policies.

For specific stakeholders, particularly the reporting institutions, the proposal could have mixed effects. On one hand, continuing the current reporting requirements without additional changes could mean stability and predictability in compliance efforts. On the other hand, the absence of revisions also implies a continued regulatory burden, especially for smaller entities that might struggle with the resources needed to meet these obligations.

The proposal's lack of clear guidelines on how feedback will be incorporated into the final decision might also negatively impact stakeholder confidence in the regulatory process, potentially reducing the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement during the comment period.

In conclusion, while the Federal Reserve Board's proposal to extend the FR 2510 aims to maintain robust monitoring of major banking entities, several concerns and potential implications require attention. Stakeholders, including both the financial community and the broader public, may be affected differently by these reporting requirements, highlighting the importance of transparent and responsive engagement processes.

Issues

  • • The document mentions potential updates to the instructions format (from two-column to one-column) for the FR 2510 but does not provide a justification for this change, raising questions about whether it is necessary and cost-effective.

  • • There is no information provided about the cost implications of the proposed extension of the information collection for three years without revision, which could raise concerns about budgeting and resource allocation.

  • • The frequency of the reporting requirement (quarterly) could impose a significant burden on respondents, especially smaller banking organizations, but there is no mention of potential adjustments or support to minimize this burden.

  • • While the document invites public comment on various aspects, it does not specify how these comments will be used in decision-making or if stakeholders will be informed of the outcomes of their feedback after the comment period ends.

  • • The document states that comments will be publicly disclosed but does not address how confidential business information submitted by commenters will be protected, which could discourage full participation.

  • • Although the document details various methods for submitting comments, the comprehensive disclosure of personal or business information being collected and its public availability may deter individuals from submitting, impacting stakeholder engagement.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,213
Sentences: 40
Entities: 90

Language

Nouns: 426
Verbs: 89
Adjectives: 51
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.31
Average Sentence Length:
30.32
Token Entropy:
5.29
Readability (ARI):
22.25

Reading Time

about 4 minutes