FR 2024-28512

Overview

Title

Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is having a private online meeting to talk about preventing violence, but people might wonder why it's completely private and if it has enough checks to make sure everyone involved is being responsible.

Summary AI

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has announced a closed meeting for the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) scheduled for April 1-2, 2025. The meeting will be held via web conference and is closed to the public to protect confidential information. It will focus on reviewing and evaluating grant applications related to formative research and pilot-testing aimed at preventing intimate partner violence and sexual violence. For more details, contact Carlisha Gentles at the CDC.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 97007
Document #: 2024-28512
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 97007-97007

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding a closed meeting set for April 1-2, 2025. The meeting will be conducted via web conference and is organized by the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel. The primary purpose of the meeting is to review and evaluate grant applications focusing on preventing intimate partner violence and sexual violence. The meeting is closed to the public due to the sensitivity and confidentiality of the information discussed, which may include trade secrets or commercial property, as well as personal data.

Summary

This notice serves as an announcement for researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders in the field of public health and violence prevention. It signifies the CDC's ongoing efforts to address critical social issues like intimate partner violence and sexual violence through community-led primary prevention approaches. The meeting is noteworthy as it involves critical evaluations of grant applications that could potentially shape future preventive measures and policies.

Issues and Concerns

One significant concern with this document lies in its lack of detailed explanation regarding the necessity for the meeting to be entirely closed. While it cites legal provisions that permit closure and touches upon protecting trade secrets and personal privacy, it does not sufficiently elaborate on why a complete closure, rather than a partial one, is necessary. This lack of transparency could raise questions about accountability, especially from the public who might have an interest in the proceedings related to issues of such considerable public importance.

Furthermore, the document's language is somewhat vague in describing the nature of the confidential information discussed during the meeting. More specific examples or explanations could enhance public understanding and trust, as broad terms like "trade secrets" or "commercial property" may be subject to various interpretations.

Additionally, the notice includes detailed contact information for further inquiries. While transparency and accessibility are generally positive, listing personal professional details can raise privacy concerns, particularly when connected to specific roles within the CDC.

Public Impact

For the general public, this meeting signifies a positive step toward addressing the pressing issues of intimate partner violence and sexual violence. Although the meeting is closed, it reassures concerned citizens that the CDC is actively working on solutions that could lead to safer communities.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders, including researchers, funding bodies, and community organizations, this meeting could have significant implications. Successful grant applications reviewed in this meeting could lead to new projects and collaborations focused on violence prevention. However, the closed nature of the meeting might leave some stakeholders feeling excluded or uncertain about the selection criteria and assessment processes.

In conclusion, while the confidentiality of the meeting is justified by legal standards, greater transparency and specificity could enhance public trust and involvement. Balancing privacy with openness is crucial, especially when dealing with topics that deeply affect community well-being.

Issues

  • • The document states the meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with specific legal provisions, but does not clearly justify why it must be entirely closed rather than partially or not at all, raising potential concerns about transparency.

  • • The language used, such as 'the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property' and 'clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy,' is somewhat vague and could benefit from more specific examples or explanations.

  • • The document mentions the Delegation of authority to Kalwant Smagh for signing notices but does not provide a background or rationale for this particular delegation, which could raise questions about oversight and accountability.

  • • The contact information provided for further inquiries is very detailed, which might raise privacy concerns, especially with regard to directly mentioning specific individuals with their professional roles and personal details.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 399
Sentences: 14
Entities: 37

Language

Nouns: 161
Verbs: 16
Adjectives: 11
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.29
Average Sentence Length:
28.50
Token Entropy:
4.71
Readability (ARI):
21.02

Reading Time

about a minute or two