FR 2024-28510

Overview

Title

Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The CDC is having a secret online meeting in April to talk about plans to prevent people from driving under the influence of multiple substances. They are keeping it secret because they need to discuss private and sensitive information.

Summary AI

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has announced a closed meeting of the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel. The meeting, scheduled for April 15-16, 2025, will take place via web conference from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT. During the meeting, the panel will review and evaluate grant applications related to research on the prevention of polysubstance-impaired driving. The meeting is closed to the public to protect confidential information and personal privacy.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 97005
Document #: 2024-28510
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 97005-97006

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) about a closed meeting of the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel. The focus of this meeting, scheduled for April 15-16, 2025, is the evaluation of grant applications aimed at research to prevent polysubstance-impaired driving. Set to take place via web conference, the meeting is closed to the public to safeguard confidential trade secrets and personal information.

General Summary

The notice lays out the essential details of a forthcoming meeting but remains restricted to the public. It highlights that the purpose of this closed meeting is to assess grant applications pertinent to investigating methods to prevent impaired driving caused by multiple substances. Emphasis is placed on protecting sensitive information, including proprietary trade secrets and personal data linked to individuals involved with the grant applications. The meeting will take place over two days, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT, using a web conferencing format.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from this notice:

  • Lack of Abstract: The absence of a concise abstract or summary might leave readers unclear about the purpose and importance of this closed meeting.
  • Omitting Grant Details: There is no mention of the number of grant applications under review, missing an opportunity to illuminate the scale and potential impact of the research.
  • Selection and Review Criteria: The document does not elucidate on how grant applications will be selected or reviewed, which may lead to concerns about transparency and fairness.
  • Explanation of Terms and Abbreviations: The use of technical terms and abbreviations without explanation, such as B.C.P.S. and C.D.C.E.S., might confuse individuals unfamiliar with these designations.
  • Justification for Web Conference Format: The rationale for choosing web conferencing as the meeting format is not provided, leaving questions regarding the decision to forego in-person gatherings or other formats.

Impact on the Public

For the public at large, this notice illustrates the government's investment in tackling polysubstance-impaired driving—a matter of public health and safety. By focusing on research, the CDC endeavors to devise effective prevention strategies, ultimately aiming to reduce the risk posed by impaired drivers on roads.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Researchers and Applicants: The grant applicants, primarily researchers and associated professionals, stand to gain from potential funding that could advance their work in the field. However, knowing that their proprietary and personal information is protected during the review process provides a sense of security.
  • Public Safety Officials: These stakeholders might benefit from future research findings, which could equip them with new tools or insights to combat impaired driving more efficiently.
  • Medical and Health Communities: They may see indirect benefits, as improving public safety and reducing impaired driving can positively affect community health outcomes.

In summary, while this notice effectively communicates the occurrence of a closed meeting, a lack of detailed information and clarifications could lead to opacity, reducing public understanding and trust in the process. There is a need for more transparency in how proposals are considered and the specific reasons for the meeting's closure to bolster public confidence and support.

Issues

  • • The notice lacks an abstract or summarized purpose, which would provide context for the reader and clarify the main reasons for closing the meeting to the public.

  • • There is no mention of the total number of grant applications to be reviewed, which could indicate the scale of the task and the resources required.

  • • The document does not specify any criteria or process for selecting which grant applications to discuss, which could raise concerns about favoritism or bias.

  • • The reference to confidential trade secrets and personal information could benefit from more specific examples to clarify what constitutes such information in this context.

  • • The name of the committee is quite lengthy, and the abbreviation (SEP) could be explained further to ensure clarity for those not familiar with this terminology.

  • • The document includes technical terms and acronyms (e.g., B.C.P.S., C.D.C.E.S.) without further explanation, which could make it difficult for people not familiar with the field.

  • • The rationale for selecting the meeting format (Web Conference) is not provided, which could help justify the choice and understand resource allocation.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 390
Sentences: 14
Entities: 36

Language

Nouns: 155
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.38
Average Sentence Length:
27.86
Token Entropy:
4.69
Readability (ARI):
21.11

Reading Time

about a minute or two