FR 2024-28491

Overview

Title

Notice of Inventory Completion: The Kikuchi Center at Kaua`i Community College, Līhu`e, HI

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Kikuchi Center at Kaua`i Community College has found old bones and a fish hook that they believe belong to Native Hawaiian people, and they're getting ready to give them back to the right groups by January 2025. If different groups want the items, the Kikuchi Center will decide who should get them.

Summary AI

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, the Kikuchi Center at Kaua`i Community College has completed an inventory of human remains and a bone fish hook associated with them. They determined a cultural link between these remains and Native Hawaiian organizations. Repatriation to the rightful tribes or organizations may begin as early as January 6, 2025, with requests needing to be sent to Jason Ford at the Kikuchi Center. If there are competing claims, the Kikuchi Center will decide the most appropriate recipient prior to repatriation.

Abstract

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the Kikuchi Center at Kaua`i Community College has completed an inventory of human remains and associated funerary objects and has determined that there is a cultural affiliation between the human remains and associated funerary objects and Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations in this notice.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 96672
Document #: 2024-28491
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 96672-96673

AnalysisAI

In a recent notice published in the Federal Register, the Kikuchi Center at Kaua`i Community College has announced the completion of an inventory of human remains and a bone fish hook found in Maui, Hawaii. Pursuant to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), these remains have been culturally linked to Native Hawaiian organizations, signifying an important step towards returning them to their rightful communities.

Summary

The Kikuchi Center has identified the human remains as those of an individual of Native Hawaiian ancestry, associated with a single funerary object — a bone fish hook. This association is significant as it establishes cultural ties between the remains and Native Hawaiian organizations. Repatriation efforts are set to begin on January 6, 2025, providing a clear timeline for Hawaiian tribes and organizations to stake their claims. Jason Ford at the Kikuchi Center is the point of contact for repatriation requests, which must be submitted in writing.

Significant Issues

Several issues arise from this notice. Firstly, the consultation process determining the cultural affiliation is not elaborated upon, which may raise concerns about transparency. Stakeholders may question how decisions were reached and if relevant parties were adequately consulted. Secondly, the language used to describe how the "most appropriate requestor" will be determined in the case of competing claims is vague. This ambiguity could lead to misunderstandings or disappointment if involved parties feel the process is not adequately defined.

Moreover, potential claimants not initially identified in the notice must prove their affiliation through a "preponderance of the evidence," but the notice lacks detailed criteria or guidelines on this process. Finally, the notice does not specify how the Kikuchi Center ensures an unbiased process when determining the rightful recipients in case of multiple requests. This lack of detail leaves room for potential disputes or perceptions of inequality in decision-making.

Public Impact

The process outlined in this document impacts the public broadly by reiterating the importance of respecting and preserving Native Hawaiian culture and heritage. For Hawaii's population and indigenous communities, the return of ancestral remains signifies respect and recognition of their cultural and historical rights.

Stakeholder Impact

For Native Hawaiian organizations and tribes, this process provides a potential opportunity to reclaim culturally significant remains, facilitating healing and cultural preservation. However, the lack of detailed guidelines and transparency might pose challenges and uncertainties for these stakeholders. The process's potential complexity and vagueness could create hurdles in proving cultural affiliation and navigating competing claims.

In summary, while the notice marks a positive step towards honoring Native Hawaiian heritage, clarity, transparency, and detailed criteria in the repatriation process are necessary to ensure fair and satisfactory outcomes for all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • • The document provides limited information about the specific consultation process conducted to determine cultural affiliation, which might be important for transparency.

  • • The language surrounding the criteria for determining the 'most appropriate requestor' in case of competing requests is vague and lacks detail.

  • • The document does not outline any specific criteria or process for lineal descendants or organizations not initially identified to prove their affiliation beyond a 'preponderance of the evidence,' which could lead to ambiguity.

  • • Information about how the Kikuchi Center at Kaua`i Community College ensures an unbiased determination process in case of competing requests is missing.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 891
Sentences: 38
Entities: 81

Language

Nouns: 299
Verbs: 70
Adjectives: 55
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 42

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.00
Average Sentence Length:
23.45
Token Entropy:
5.02
Readability (ARI):
17.54

Reading Time

about 3 minutes