FR 2024-28459

Overview

Title

Atrazine; Updated Proposed Mitigation for the Interim Registration Review Decision; Notice of Availability and Request for Comment

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA is making a plan to help farmers stop a chemical called atrazine from getting into water where plants live, and they want to hear what people think about it. They’re asking for ideas until February 2025 to make sure plants stay safe and healthy.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a proposal to update the mitigation measures for atrazine, a widely used herbicide. This updated plan includes using a new threshold of 9.7 micrograms per liter for water concentration levels that would trigger protective measures for aquatic environments. The proposal aims to provide flexible options to farmers to lessen the impact of atrazine runoff on aquatic plant life by introducing new measures to reduce erosion and runoff. The public is invited to submit comments on these proposed changes by February 3, 2025.

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is announcing the availability of and requesting comment on EPA's proposed updates to the mitigation in the interim registration review decision for atrazine (Case Number 0062). The updated mitigation proposal for atrazine reflected in the memorandum being released for comment incorporates the revised level of concern of 9.7 micrograms per liter ([micro]g/L) as well as corrections to exposure modeling and feedback received during the 2022 public comment period. EPA is releasing its updated mitigation proposal to reduce run-off/erosion, which will expand the number of options of mitigation measures growers can choose to implement to reduce potential exposure and risk to aquatic plant communities from atrazine runoff in vulnerable watersheds. The proposal includes placing mitigations on the product labeling, directing users to EPA's mitigation menu website and to the Bulletins Live! Two system. The Agency is not soliciting comment on any other aspects of the atrazine interim registration review decision.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 96650
Document #: 2024-28459
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 96650-96651

AnalysisAI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a notice proposing updates to the mitigation strategies in place for atrazine, a commonly used herbicide. This proposal is part of the EPA's ongoing registration review, a process designed to ensure that pesticides do not have unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. With a focus on aquatic plant communities, the EPA has proposed a new threshold of 9.7 micrograms per liter for water concentration levels of atrazine, at which point mitigation measures would be triggered.

Summary of the Proposal

The document outlines an updated mitigation strategy aiming to reduce the impact of atrazine run-off into aquatic environments. Atrazine is widely used in agriculture, and its run-off can pose risks to aquatic plant life. The EPA’s proposal seeks to offer farmers various flexible options to mitigate these risks. Stakeholders, particularly those in agriculture, are encouraged to participate in the decision-making process by submitting their comments before the February 3, 2025 deadline.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document that may be of concern to the general public and specific stakeholders:

  1. Complex Language: The document uses technical scientific and regulatory language, potentially hindering understanding for individuals without a background in environmental science or regulatory laws.

  2. Online Resources: Multiple references are made to online resources intended to support users in implementing mitigation measures. However, the document lacks detailed guidance on how individuals without reliable internet access might obtain the necessary information.

  3. Unspecified Mitigation Measures: The document speaks broadly about new mitigation options but does not provide specific details about these measures. This leaves ambiguity around what actions are actually proposed to curb atrazine run-off.

  4. Financial Implications: There is no discussion on the potential costs associated with implementing these measures. This absence of economic analysis may worry stakeholders such as farmers and pesticide producers who could bear these costs.

  5. Revised Level of Concern: The document refers to a new level of concern of 9.7 micrograms per liter without context or explanation of how this figure was determined, making it difficult for readers to understand its significance or how it compares to previous thresholds.

  6. Environmental Justice: The document does not adequately address the potential environmental justice implications, including how the updated strategies might impact vulnerable communities differently.

  7. Incorporation of Feedback: It is unclear how public comments from 2022 were integrated into this proposal, creating a lack of transparency about whether and how earlier concerns were addressed.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The proposed updates have the potential to impact both the general public and specific stakeholder groups in various ways:

  • Public Health and Environment: By attempting to reduce atrazine runoff, the proposal aims to protect aquatic environments and possibly human health indirectly. This can be seen as a positive step for environmental advocacy groups and individuals concerned about pesticide impacts.

  • Agricultural Community: Farmers and agricultural professionals may feel both positive and negative impacts. On the one hand, the flexibility in mitigation options is beneficial as it allows for more tailored approaches. On the other hand, without clarity on specific measures and costs, these groups may face uncertainty and potential financial burdens.

Conclusion

The EPA's proposal to update mitigation measures for atrazine reflects ongoing efforts to better protect the environment while balancing agricultural needs. However, the document leaves several critical questions unanswered, particularly around specific measures, financial implications, and integration of public feedback, which might influence the decision-making process for stakeholders and the public at large. As such, engaging with the proposal through public comments presents an important opportunity for stakeholders to have their voices heard and for the EPA to refine its strategies effectively.

Issues

  • • The document contains complex scientific and regulatory language that may be difficult for the general public to understand without a background in environmental science or regulatory processes.

  • • The proposal includes multiple references to online resources, such as EPA's mitigation menu website and Bulletins Live! Two system, but does not provide a detailed explanation of how these resources will be accessed by users who may not have internet access.

  • • The specific mitigation measures that are proposed are not detailed in the document, making it unclear what specific actions are being recommended to reduce atrazine runoff and exposure.

  • • There is no discussion on the potential financial implications or costs associated with implementing the proposed mitigations, which could be of concern to stakeholders such as farmers or pesticide manufacturers.

  • • The revised level of concern, 9.7 micrograms per liter, is mentioned without context or explanation regarding how this level was determined and its significance compared to previous levels.

  • • The document lacks information on potential environmental justice implications of atrazine use, specifically regarding how updated mitigations will address or prevent disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities.

  • • No details are provided on how feedback from the 2022 public comment period was incorporated into the current proposal, leaving it ambiguous regarding which concerns were addressed.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,783
Sentences: 74
Entities: 113

Language

Nouns: 621
Verbs: 162
Adjectives: 114
Adverbs: 21
Numbers: 57

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.49
Average Sentence Length:
24.09
Token Entropy:
5.45
Readability (ARI):
20.18

Reading Time

about 6 minutes