FR 2024-28441

The document from the Federal Register concerns the planned renewal of the Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) by the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) within the National Science Foundation (NSF). This survey aims to collect data on individuals with doctorates in science, engineering, and health from U.S. institutions. The gathered information is intended to provide insights into their employment, education, and demographic characteristics. Such information is crucial for producing reports meant for use by policymakers, researchers, and educators.

Summary

The renewal of this survey, which has been conducted biennially since 1973, will involve collecting responses from a significant sample size of approximately 116,000 individuals. The survey will employ web surveys and phone interviews beginning in June 2025, with an expected response rate of about 70%. It is designed to yield national estimates on the doctoral science and engineering workforce, touching on factors such as employment trends, educational pathways, and demographic shifts. The data collected are also made available to the public to support further research and analysis.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from the document. Firstly, there is no detailed information regarding the estimated cost or funding source for conducting the survey. This absence could hinder a clear assessment of its financial implications and potential for wasteful spending. Additionally, the document uses technical language, which may be challenging for individuals who are not familiar with data collection jargon. This complexity might restrict public understanding and limit feedback.

Furthermore, while public comments are invited, the process by which these comments might influence the survey or how they will be addressed is unclear. This lack of transparency could make public participation seem more formal than substantive. Moreover, the document does not provide details on the selection process for the 10,000 new doctorate recipients, raising questions about the impartiality of the sample selection.

Another critical issue is the handling of data privacy. The document mentions compliance with the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act but does not elaborate on specific measures taken to ensure data privacy. This might not be reassuring enough for potential respondents concerned about the confidentiality of their information.

Impact on the Public

The survey's results can significantly impact the public by informing national policy decisions related to science and engineering fields. It potentially guides investments in education and research, which can result in broader societal benefits. However, the technical nature of the document might limit widespread engagement, reducing the extent to which the public can influence or feel connected to these processes.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For academic and government researchers, the survey provides a valuable dataset for understanding trends in the science and engineering workforce. Policymakers may rely on its findings to shape relevant policies, while employers might use it to track industry trends and make strategic decisions. Potentially negative impacts include respondent apprehension about privacy, which might reduce participation levels.

In summary, while the document outlines a study essential for understanding vital workforce attributes, its lack of clarity in critical areas may hinder public engagement and assurance. Addressing privacy concerns and simplifying the communication of the survey process could enhance the public's trust and the survey's overall utility.