FR 2024-28399

Overview

Title

Telemarketing Sales Rule

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government made new rules to keep people safe from phone scams pretending to be tech support, especially older folks. These rules start in January 2025 and will help stop bad guys who try to trick people when they call for help with their computers or gadgets.

Summary AI

The Federal Trade Commission has adopted changes to the Telemarketing Sales Rule to address deceptive technical support scams. These amendments extend the Rule to cover inbound telemarketing calls responding to advertisements or direct mail solicitations offering tech support services. The changes aim to protect consumers, especially older adults, from tech support scams frequently exploiting them. The amendments will become effective on January 9, 2025, and are designed to strengthen consumer protections and allow the FTC to take more robust enforcement actions against deceptive practices in tech support telemarketing.

Abstract

The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission") adopts amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule ("TSR" or "Rule") that extend the Rule's applicability to inbound telemarketing calls in response to an advertisement through any medium or direct mail solicitation in which technical support products or services are offered for sale.

Type: Rule
Citation: 89 FR 99069
Document #: 2024-28399
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 99069-99076

AnalysisAI

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule aimed at curbing deceptive technical support scams. These changes extend the Rule’s coverage to include inbound telemarketing calls spurred by any advertisements or direct mail solicitations offering tech support services. The amendments will take effect on January 9, 2025, marking a significant effort by the FTC to protect consumers, particularly older adults, from fraud.

General Summary of the Document

The document details the FTC’s announcement of amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule. The key change is the inclusion of inbound calls in response to advertisements or mailings related to tech support services. This move is targeted at reducing the financial harm caused by fraudulent tech support schemes. The FTC notes that such scams often exploit older consumers, leading to substantial financial losses. The rule change is intended to enable more stringent enforcement actions and provide clearer pathways for consumer protection.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document is densely packed with legal and regulatory terminology, which may prove challenging for the average reader. The detailed calculations concerning the Paperwork Reduction Act burden and supporting statistics could open up areas of confusion or misinterpretation. Furthermore, the document includes a dissenting opinion touching on politically charged contentions related to the FTC’s rulemaking authority.

There are also potential ambiguities in the language used, such as the definition of "physical possession" concerning tech support services. Such vagueness may lead to confusion over which tech support activities fall under the rule.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, these amendments represent a significant step in consumer protection against telemarketing fraud, particularly benefiting vulnerable groups like the elderly. By closing loopholes that previously allowed tech scams to flourish, the rule changes will likely enhance the safeguarding of consumer finances from deceitful practices.

On the flip side, businesses that provide legitimate tech support services might experience increased compliance burdens. With new record-keeping and disclosure requirements, companies must align with additional regulatory standards, potentially raising operational costs.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For consumers, especially older Americans, the rule adjustments are expected to offer reinforced protection from fraudulent schemes, which have historically targeted this demographic. Consumer advocacy groups and legal entities focused on consumer rights will likely support these changes due to their potential in reducing fraud cases.

Conversely, small businesses within the tech support industry may view the requirements as onerous. The need to navigate complex legal regulations could deter smaller enterprises without the resources to absorb the increased administrative overhead. However, these businesses may benefit from clearer, more transparent guidelines, ultimately fostering trust from consumers wary of tech support fraud.

In summary, while the amendments carry the promise of improved consumer security and reduced fraud, they also necessitate careful consideration and interpretation to ensure that both consumers and businesses can navigate the new regulatory landscape effectively.

Financial Assessment

In the document concerning amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule, several financial references are noted throughout various sections, focusing largely on consumer financial loss and regulatory costs associated with telemarketing fraud.

Consumer Financial Losses

One of the significant financial highlights of the document is the level of consumer losses attributed to tech support scams. It is reported that in 2023 alone, consumers experienced losses amounting to $242 million, with the median loss per consumer being $1,400. These figures underline the critical financial impact of such scams on individuals, emphasizing the impetus for regulatory action. Furthermore, it highlights a concerning increase in complaints related to tech support scams, which soared from 40,000 in 2017 to over 90,000 in 2023. This sharp increase in both complaints and financial losses underscores the urgency of addressing deceptive practices promptly.

Estimated Costs of Telemarketing Fraud

The document also discusses estimates related to telemarketing fraud more broadly. There is a mention of a historical Congressional estimate, which puts the annual consumer injury from telemarketing fraud at $40 billion. This estimate serves to frame the financial burden telemarketing fraud places on consumers and supports the rationale for the regulatory amendments being discussed.

Regulatory Costs and Burdens

From a regulatory perspective, the document details the costs associated with complying with the amended rule. The labor costs for disclosures are estimated to be $323,130 annually, calculated from an assumed hourly wage rate of $17.64 for 18,318 hours of disclosure activity. Furthermore, the labor cost for recordkeeping is projected at $2,947,388, assuming a skilled labor rate of $31.95 per hour for the tasks required to comply with the Rule for the 615 new entities the rule is expected to cover.

In terms of non-labor costs, the annual expenses per entity for recordkeeping are pegged at $55, resulting in a total estimated cost of $33,855 across all new entities.

Relation to Identified Issues

These financial references are integral in understanding the broad economic implications of tech support scams and telemarketing fraud. They showcase the substantial losses incurred by consumers and the administrative costs of regulating these activities. The figures provide a quantitative foundation supporting the amendment's necessity, addressing the mishap that financial losses due to scams might continue to increase unregulated. However, these references also point to potential issues, such as the complexity surrounding the calculations of new regulatory burdens and the need for accurate and comprehensible dissemination of these financial impacts to a general audience. This complexity may lead to misinterpretation among those not well-versed in financial or legal jargon, thus requiring clear and effective communication strategies by the agencies involved.

Overall, the document highlights significant financial stakes involved for both consumers and regulatory bodies, reinforcing the need to tackle telemarketing fraud through stringent regulatory oversight and ensuring that these efforts are communicated effectively to protect America's consumers.

Issues

  • • The document contains a high level of complexity and legal jargon that may be difficult for a general audience to understand.

  • • There are detailed calculations regarding the Paperwork Reduction Act and associated burdens that may have potential for error or misinterpretation.

  • • The document includes numerous footnotes and references that could make it cumbersome to navigate for readers unfamiliar with such citations.

  • • The dissenting statement mentions policy decisions that may be seen as politically charged or biased.

  • • The extensive use of legal and governmental references might be overwhelming for non-expert readers, leading to confusion or misunderstanding.

  • • The justification for the amendment, while detailed, could be seen as complex and may benefit from a more concise summary.

  • • Potential ambiguity in the language regarding what constitutes 'physical possession' of a device in terms of tech support services.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 8
Words: 10,871
Sentences: 377
Entities: 902

Language

Nouns: 3,352
Verbs: 875
Adjectives: 546
Adverbs: 318
Numbers: 650

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.00
Average Sentence Length:
28.84
Token Entropy:
6.06
Readability (ARI):
24.75

Reading Time

about 45 minutes