Overview
Title
Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The CDC is asking people to share their thoughts about a plan to check if programs are working to keep people safe from getting hurt. They want to make sure these programs are helpful and need people's ideas before they keep collecting information.
Summary AI
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is seeking public comments on an ongoing information collection project called Performance Monitoring of CDC's Core State Injury Prevention Program (SIPP). This initiative aims to improve injury prevention programs and demonstrate their effectiveness in reducing injury-related illnesses and deaths. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, the CDC must gather public input before continuing the collection of this information, which helps track progress and effectiveness across different states. Comments must be submitted by February 3, 2025, and CDC requests approval for an estimated 286 hours of annual respondent burden time.
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the utility of government information, invites the general public and other federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed information collection project titled Performance Monitoring of CDC's Core State Injury Prevention Program (SIPP). The goal of Core SIPP is to strengthen the awardee's injury prevention programs and policies and demonstrate impact in the reduction of injury-related morbidity and mortality.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Federal Register is a notice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which is part of the Health and Human Services Department in the United States. It invites public comments on the continuation of an information collection project known as the Performance Monitoring of CDC's Core State Injury Prevention Program (SIPP). The primary aim of this program is to enhance injury prevention strategies and demonstrate their effectiveness in reducing injury-related health issues and fatalities. Comments on this initiative must be submitted to the CDC by February 3, 2025. The agency estimates it will require 286 hours of respondent time annually for the data collection.
General Summary
The CDC is seeking public input on a project that collects data to monitor the performance of injury prevention programs across different states. This data is critical for tracking progress and estimating the effectiveness of these programs in preventing injuries and related health problems. By hosting a public comment period, the CDC aims to ensure the collection methods are useful and practical, in line with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Significant Issues or Concerns
There are several potential issues with this notice:
Burden Estimate Details: The notice estimates an annual burden of 286 hours for respondents but lacks detail on how this figure is calculated or how it's distributed among the 26 recipients of the program. This lack of specificity may lead to confusion or misunderstandings about the workload involved.
Abstract Language: The document uses terms like "reliable, uniform, and timely submission" without defining these further, which could result in varying interpretations of compliance standards.
Cost Clarity: While the document mentions information collection costs, it does not specify what these might entail, leaving stakeholders unclear about potential financial commitments.
Stakeholder Utilization: Various stakeholders such as HHS, the White House, and Congress are mentioned, but the document does not specify how each will use the data or how it aligns with their needs, which can obscure the benefits they might derive.
Complex Language: The language used to describe the project's purpose and method is complex and may be challenging for general public understanding, potentially limiting meaningful feedback during the comment period.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this document indicates the CDC’s commitment to improving public health by refining its injury prevention programs. By inviting public comments, it aims to increase transparency and gather diverse input, potentially leading to more effective data collection methods that can directly benefit public health initiatives. However, the lack of clarity in some parts might hinder public participation or limit the constructive feedback necessary for optimizing the program.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For state health departments, the data collection is crucial in tracking and enhancing their injury prevention strategies. However, the administrative load could be significant, depending on how the 286 hours of burden is distributed among them. For policymakers and federal stakeholders, the data collected is invaluable for shaping healthcare policies and programs. Yet, without clear direction on how they will utilize this data, the impact may not be as significant as intended.
In summary, while the CDC’s initiative is beneficial for ongoing public health efforts, the document could improve in providing clearer details to ensure comprehensive public and stakeholder engagement.
Issues
• The notice provides an estimated burden of 286 annual hours for data collection from respondents but does not clearly break down how this burden is calculated or distributed among the 26 recipients. This lack of detail may hinder understanding and assessment of the burden estimate.
• The language used in the document, such as 'reliable, uniform, and timely submission,' is somewhat abstract and lacks specific metrics or standards, which could lead to ambiguity about the requirements for compliance.
• The document refers to the deduction of information collection costs but does not detail what these costs might involve, which can be unclear for stakeholders evaluating the financial implications.
• The document mentions various stakeholders, such as HHS, the White House, and Congress, without specifying how each will utilize the data or how the data collection aligns with their specific needs, which could result in ambiguity regarding stakeholder benefits.
• The complexity of the language in sections describing the purpose and method of the proposed data collection may be difficult for general public understanding, potentially limiting meaningful public feedback during the comment period.