FR 2024-28317

Overview

Title

Notice of Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund Effective Date; NorthWestern Corporation

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to check if the prices that NorthWestern Corporation charges for their services are too high or unfair. People who are interested in being part of this check must let the government know within 21 days, and they can either use the internet or mail to do this.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has launched an investigation to determine if NorthWestern Corporation's Rate Schedule is unfair or unlawful. The Commission set a refund effective date, which will be the date this notice is published in the Federal Register. Anyone interested in participating must submit a notice or motion to intervene within 21 days. The Commission encourages electronic submissions via their website, but paper copies can also be sent to their offices in Washington, D.C., or Rockville, Maryland.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 95771
Document #: 2024-28317
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 95771-95771

AnalysisAI

The document issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announces the initiation of an investigation into the Rate Schedule of NorthWestern Corporation under the provisions of the Federal Power Act. The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether the rates set by NorthWestern Corporation are unjust, unreasonable, or otherwise discriminatory or unlawful. As part of this proceeding, the Commission has established a random refund effective date, tied to the publication of this notice in the Federal Register.

General Summary

The notice serves to inform the public and interested parties of the investigation and sets the framework for participation in the proceeding. It outlines the procedures for intervening in the docket and provides details for submitting comments or protests. Participants are encouraged to file their submissions electronically via the Commission’s eFile system, although provisions are made for paper submissions as well.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document, primarily around accessibility and comprehension:

  1. Complex Legal Language: The notice is replete with legal jargon and references to specific statutory provisions and regulatory rules. This may pose comprehension challenges for those unfamiliar with legal terminology or the inner workings of FERC.

  2. Access to Information: While details are given for accessing documents through FERC’s eLibrary, the instructions might overwhelm individuals who are not accustomed to using these digital tools. This complexity may inadvertently exclude some interested parties from participating fully.

  3. Multiple Submission Addresses: The mention of two different submission addresses depending on the carrier used for paper submissions could cause confusion, potentially leading to misdirected correspondence.

  4. Limited Public Guidance: The role of the Office of Public Participation (OPP) is mentioned, yet the scope of assistance they provide is not clearly outlined. Greater clarity could help the public understand what support is available to them, particularly in navigating these bureaucratic processes.

Impact on the Public

From a broad perspective, the investigation reflects a regulatory mechanism aimed at ensuring fair and lawful pricing within the energy sector. This can be beneficial to consumers who may be subject to unjust or discriminatory rates. By reviewing and potentially adjusting these rates, the Commission can protect consumer interests and promote equitable access to energy.

However, the heavy reliance on digital resources and the presumption of a certain level of knowledge regarding FERC procedures could marginalize segments of the population without reliable internet access or sufficient understanding of the regulatory framework. This could limit broader public engagement and feedback.

Specific Stakeholder Impact

Stakeholders such as consumers and advocacy groups may view the investigation as a positive step towards accountability and fairness in energy pricing. These groups can potentially leverage the process to address grievances related to energy costs.

Conversely, NorthWestern Corporation faces scrutiny and possible implications for its financial arrangements and public image, depending on the outcomes of the proceeding. An unfavorable finding could necessitate rate adjustments retroactive to the refund effective date, affecting its revenue stream.

In conclusion, while the document sets a procedural foundation for stakeholder engagement and regulatory action, its effectiveness can be hampered by accessibility issues and the clarity of communication to a diverse public. Simplifying the language and process, and enhancing outreach efforts, could significantly enhance public participation and ensure the investigation achieves its intended outcomes.

Issues

  • • The document does not contain information about potential spending, wasteful or otherwise, so it's difficult to audit for wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The language used in describing the process for intervention and filing comments is complex and includes many legal references that may be difficult for the general public to understand, such as 'pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act' and 'in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure.'

  • • The instructions for accessing documents via eLibrary are detailed but may confuse individuals unfamiliar with the process, as it requires exclusion of the last three digits in the docket number field.

  • • There are two different addresses for submissions based on the carrier, which might confuse respondents.

  • • Although the document mentions the Office of Public Participation (OPP) for assistance, the contact details and functionalities offered by OPP are not elaborated enough for users to understand what specific help they can expect.

  • • The notice relies heavily on electronic filing and internet-based resources, which may disadvantage individuals without reliable internet access.

  • • The document assumes familiarity with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) processes without providing a simplified overview or guide for those unfamiliar with them.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 647
Sentences: 21
Entities: 75

Language

Nouns: 215
Verbs: 38
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 53

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.92
Average Sentence Length:
30.81
Token Entropy:
5.04
Readability (ARI):
20.59

Reading Time

about 2 minutes