FR 2024-28252

Overview

Title

South Sutter Water District; Notice of Reasonable Period of Time for Water Quality Certification Application

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said that a group called the South Sutter Water District in California asked for permission on October 25, 2024, to make sure their water is clean. The California Water Board has one year, until October 25, 2025, to say yes or no; if they don't decide, it's like saying yes!

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has announced that the California State Water Resources Control Board received an application for a Clean Water Act section 401 water quality certification from the South Sutter Water District on October 25, 2024. The Water Board must respond to this request by October 25, 2025. If the Board fails to act by then, the certification requirement will be considered waived according to federal law.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 95770
Document #: 2024-28252
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 95770-95770

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register pertains to a notice involving the South Sutter Water District and its application for a water quality certification under section 401 of the Clean Water Act. This application has been reported by the California State Water Resources Control Board to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The essential details and implications of this notice merit further exploration.

General Summary

On October 25, 2024, the South Sutter Water District applied for a water quality certification with the California State Water Resources Control Board. This certification is crucial for projects that may result in discharges into U.S. waters, ensuring compliance with water quality standards. The Water Board must respond to the application by October 25, 2025. If they do not, certification is considered waived, enabling the project to proceed without state conditions that might otherwise be imposed under section 401 of the Clean Water Act.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One prominent issue with the document is the absence of an abstract or easily accessible summary, which could impede understanding for those not accustomed to legal documents. Moreover, references to legal regulations, such as "18 CFR 4.34(b)(5)" and "33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1)," might be challenging for a general audience to comprehend without additional context. The formality of the language, typical in governmental notices, might also present difficulties for wider readability and immediate grasp of its implications.

Public Impact

The document holds considerable significance for the public, especially for communities in the vicinity of the South Sutter Water District. The certification process ensures environmental safeguards by obligating projects to adhere to established water quality standards. A failure by the Water Board to act within the defined period may result in waiving the certification requirement, potentially allowing a project to proceed without certain environmental oversight.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For the South Sutter Water District, receiving this water quality certification is pivotal. It can influence project timelines and environmental compliance costs. Successfully acquiring the certification can facilitate project progression, whereas delays or denials could impose additional requirements or halt developments.

Local residents and environmental groups may view the water quality certification process as an essential mechanism to protect regional water resources. The stipulation that allows for certification to be waived could be seen as a regulatory loophole, possibly undermining environmental protection efforts if adequate review is not conducted.

In contrast, stakeholders in the energy sector, including those aligned with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, might perceive this regulatory framework as necessary to streamline project approvals, maintaining a balance between developmental objectives and environmental integrity.

Conclusion

This notice highlights a critical aspect of regulatory processes related to water quality certifications under the Clean Water Act. It serves as a reminder of the legal timelines and conditions that state authorities must adhere to. The document's complexity, however, underscores the need for clearer communication to ensure that all stakeholders, especially the general public, can fully understand how such regulations and decisions may affect them and their environment.

Issues

  • • The abstract section in the metadata is null, which might be helpful for a brief summary of the notice.

  • • The action field in the metadata is null, which might be beneficial to specify the action taken in the notice.

  • • The document does not provide an abstract or summary in the text itself, limiting immediate understanding of its purpose.

  • • The use of legal and regulatory references (such as CFR and U.S.C.) without providing a brief explanation could be challenging for those not familiar with these references.

  • • The document follows a formal tone appropriate for legal or governmental text, which may not be easily digestible for general public understanding.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 226
Sentences: 9
Entities: 25

Language

Nouns: 76
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 6
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 24

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.89
Average Sentence Length:
25.11
Token Entropy:
4.47
Readability (ARI):
17.36

Reading Time

less than a minute