FR 2024-28247

Overview

Title

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FERC is updating their record-keeping system for handling complaints about unfair treatment at work, making sure the information is kept safe and deciding who can see it, just like making sure someone takes good care of a secret treasure map.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced updates to its system of records related to Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) discrimination complaints, under the Privacy Act of 1974. These updates include new routine uses of the records, such as sharing information in the event of a data breach. Comments on the changes are open for 30 days from the date of publication. The system records details of complaints from FERC employees, applicants, and others involved in EEO cases, and all data will be stored securely with restrictions on access.

Abstract

In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, all agencies are required to publish in the Federal Register a notice of their systems of records. Notice is hereby given that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is publishing a notice of modifications to an existing FERC system of records titled "Commission Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Discrimination Complaint Records (FERC-19)" previously titled "Commission Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Discrimination Complaints File".

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 95773
Document #: 2024-28247
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 95773-95775

AnalysisAI

The document published by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announces updates to its system of records concerning Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) discrimination complaints, aligning with the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. This system, now titled "Commission Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Discrimination Complaint Records (FERC-19)," gathers and maintains data from complaints filed by FERC employees, contractors, and others related to EEO matters. The modifications include new routine uses of these records, notably the potential for sharing information during a data breach.

General Summary

The announcement from FERC is a routine exercise under the Privacy Act, requiring federal agencies to notify the public of changes to their systems of records. This notice specifies modifications to an existing system concerning discrimination complaints, introducing new procedures for maintaining and potentially sharing information, particularly in response to data breaches. Public comments on these updates are invited for 30 days from the publication date, emphasizing transparency and community engagement.

Significant Issues or Concerns

A few important issues stand out in this announcement:

  • The document refers to "twelve (12) modified and new routine uses" but does not give a detailed description of each within this notice. This lack of specificity could necessitate further research by stakeholders to fully understand the implications.

  • Although the document mentions sharing information during a data breach, it does not elaborate on how FERC will determine the severity of a breach and when it qualifies for notification and sharing with other agencies. This lack of detail could create uncertainty about the criteria used for data breach notifications.

  • The language around data access control features terms like "Single Sign-On and Multi-Factor Authentication Solution," which might be technical for a layperson. A simpler explanation might have enhanced clarity for a general audience.

  • Data retention policies mention that records can be kept longer if needed for "business use," yet they do not clarify what constitutes this criterion or provide examples, which could lead to issues in understanding the retention policy's flexibility.

  • While the document directs individuals on how to access records via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), it could better clarify the processes for contesting or requesting amendments to these records — simply directing to access procedures may not provide sufficient guidance for all individuals.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the public may view these updates as part of ongoing efforts to maintain transparency and accountability in federal government operations, particularly regarding sensitive issues like discrimination complaints. However, the lack of specificity in certain areas might hinder the public's ability to fully understand the scope and implications of the changes.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, including FERC employees, contractors, and individuals filing or involved in EEO complaints, may find these updates impacting how their data is handled and potentially shared. On a positive note, improved data handling in response to breaches indicates heightened privacy and security considerations. However, the lack of detailed disclosure about routine uses and breach criteria might leave stakeholders uncertain about their data's future handling and security.

Similarly, those involved in federal records management, legal professionals, and privacy advocates will likely scrutinize these changes for compliance and effectiveness, potentially pushing for greater clarity and precision in future notices.

Overall, while FERC's announcement represents due diligence in federal transparency, it also highlights areas where clearer communication could improve public understanding and stakeholder trust in the system.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the exact nature or scope of changes made to the system of records, which could lead to confusion or misunderstanding by the public.

  • • The document refers to 'twelve (12) modified and new routine uses' but does not provide a detailed description of each one within this notice, necessitating further research to understand them fully.

  • • There is no detailed explanation of how FERC will determine when a breach qualifies for notification to other agencies or entities.

  • • The language used to describe data access control, such as 'Single Sign-On and Multi-Factor Authentication Solution', may be technical and not immediately clear to a lay audience.

  • • Policies for data retention mention longer retention being authorized if required for business use, but there is no clear criteria or examples provided for what constitutes 'business use'.

  • • The document could include clearer guidance on how individuals can contest records or request amendments beyond directing to records access procedures, to facilitate user understanding.

  • • While the document mentions compliance with OMB Memorandum M-17-12 regarding data breaches, it does not elaborate on specific strategies or practices adopted to comply with this memorandum.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,501
Sentences: 70
Entities: 186

Language

Nouns: 917
Verbs: 169
Adjectives: 110
Adverbs: 18
Numbers: 92

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.02
Average Sentence Length:
35.73
Token Entropy:
5.51
Readability (ARI):
23.61

Reading Time

about 10 minutes