FR 2024-28246

Aquenergy Systems, LLC has submitted an application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to amend the Recreation Management Plan for the Piedmont Hydroelectric Project, which is located on the Saluda River in South Carolina. The request specifically seeks to eliminate the requirement to provide informal fishing access near the confluence of Big Brushy Creek and the Saluda River. The company proposes that fishing opportunities will remain available at designated canoe portage sites.

Key Issues and Concerns

One of the key issues with this notice is the absence of an abstract, which would have offered a succinct summary and clarified the purpose of the amendment. Such an omission makes it harder for the general public to quickly understand the document’s intent and significance. Furthermore, the document heavily relies on technical jargon, such as "motions to intervene" and references to specific sections of the Federal Power Act, which might be unclear to those unfamiliar with legal and regulatory proceedings.

Additionally, the document does not provide insights into the potential impact of removing the informal fishing access requirement. This could be a significant concern for stakeholders, such as local anglers or environmental groups, who may rely on this access for recreational fishing or ecological considerations.

Potential Impact on the Public

The proposed amendment to the Recreation Management Plan could have varying impacts on the public. For the general community in Anderson and Greenville counties, South Carolina, this change might mean fewer accessible areas for fishing, which could affect local recreational activities. However, the continued availability of fishing at other access points suggests that some opportunities will remain.

Moreover, the document invites comments and interventions from the public but provides only a short timeframe for responses — until December 26, 2024. This narrow window may restrict thorough public participation, particularly from individuals who need time to digest the information and understand its consequences.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For anglers and local recreational users who frequent the area near Big Brushy Creek, the removal of informal fishing access could represent a reduction in a cherished local amenity. Conversely, other stakeholders, such as proponents of the hydroelectric project or those concerned with land conservation, might argue for the change if it promotes project efficiency or environmental benefits.

The process for submitting comments or motions may also deter participation due to its reliance on FERC’s electronic filing systems, which might be unfamiliar to some users. Without clear and detailed guidance for new users of these systems, potential participants could be discouraged from engaging in the consultation process.

In summary, while the proposed amendment aims to modify specific aspects of the Piedmont Hydroelectric Project’s management, it raises questions about public engagement and the broader implications of reducing fishing access. The lack of detailed explanations and a short deadline for comments might hinder meaningful involvement from affected parties and stakeholders.