FR 2024-28192

The notice issued by the Veterans Benefits Administration, part of the Department of Veterans Affairs, outlines the plan to gather information via the Application for Individualized Tutorial Assistance (VA Form 22-1990t). This action aligns with the requirements set forth by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ensuring federal agencies limit the paperwork burden on the public. The collected information aims to help determine eligibility for tutorial assistance provided by educational institutions. This submission is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), marking an essential step in facilitating educational support for veterans.

General Summary

This document details the information collection process for veterans seeking tutorial assistance through educational institutions. Specifically, it explains that the VA will collect this data to assess eligibility for the funding required for such assistance. The submission to the OMB is a routine but necessary procedure under the Paperwork Reduction Act, intended to justify and streamline the paperwork necessary for this process. The public is invited to provide comments on this collection within 30 days of the notice's publication.

Significant Issues or Concerns

There are some areas of concern noted in the document:

1. Cost of Data Collection: The document misses mentioning the expected cost associated with this data collection process. Understanding the financial implications is crucial for transparency and evaluating the potential for unnecessary expenditure.

2. Clarification on Burden Estimation: The notice gives an estimated annual burden of 51 hours for 102 respondents, equating to roughly 30 minutes per response. However, it does not explain how this estimation was calculated, which might lead to uncertainty about its accuracy or fairness.

3. Frequency of Response: Respondents are required to submit this information once annually, but the document does not provide a rationale for why this frequency is necessary. Clarifying this could prevent misunderstandings or speculation about its necessity.

4. Jargon and Complexity: Terms such as "Data Governance Analytics" might be confusing for individuals unfamiliar with government operations. Simplifying this language or providing brief explanations could enhance understanding.

Impact on the Public

The broader public, particularly veterans and educational institutions, could be significantly affected by this process. By determining eligibility and payment for tutorial assistance, this initiative has the potential to enhance educational outcomes for veterans, contributing to their personal and professional development. Moreover, the ability to comment on this process ensures that the public can provide input and possibly influence the way this data collection is executed.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, including veterans and educational institutions, may experience both positive and negative impacts:

• Positive Impacts: Veterans stand to gain from improved access to tutorial assistance, which can aid in their academic endeavors and help them overcome educational barriers. Educational institutions might benefit from potential funding to support their students who are veterans.

• Negative Impacts: Educational institutions could face administrative challenges or burdens associated with complying with the information requirements. Additionally, without a clear understanding of costs involved, institutions and taxpayers might be concerned about resource allocation and efficiency.

In summary, while the document outlines a necessary procedural step toward supporting veteran education, addressing the identified concerns would enhance clarity and efficiency in its implementation. Ensuring that stakeholders understand the process and its implications will serve both the veterans and the educational institutions more effectively.