Overview
Title
Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The FCC wants to collect information and wants people's ideas on if it's necessary and easy to do. They're trying to lessen the hassle, especially for small companies, and are looking for feedback by the end of January next year.
Summary AI
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is seeking public and federal agency comments on their information collection efforts as part of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The FCC aims to determine if collecting this information is necessary, accurate, and clear, and to find ways to reduce the burden of information collection, especially for small businesses. Written comments are due by January 31, 2025. A recent update to the FCC's rules involves the Allocation and Service Rules for certain frequency bands, aiming to improve access and minimize interference.
Abstract
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has released a notice inviting public and federal agency comments regarding its information collection practices as outlined by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The primary goal of this process is to assess the necessity, accuracy, and clarity of the information being collected and to explore avenues for reducing the burdens these collections create, particularly for small businesses.
General Summary of the Document
The document under review pertains to the FCC's information collection efforts concerning specific frequency bands: 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and 92-95 GHz. The FCC is seeking commentary to determine whether the collection of such information is indeed necessary for fulfilling its duties. Additionally, it aims to evaluate the practical utility of the collected data, the accuracy of burden estimates, and techniques for enhancing data collection processes. Comments are invited to explore how collection techniques could be made less burdensome, especially for businesses with fewer than 25 employees. The deadline for submission of comments is January 31, 2025.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The document presents several issues that merit attention:
Lack of Specificity in Revisions: The FCC document mentions revisions in information collection requirements related to these frequency bands but does not provide detailed specifics about these changes. This could result in confusion or misinterpretation among stakeholders who need clear instructions for compliance.
Unexplained Cost Estimates: The document estimates an annual cost of $200,000 for the information collection process but does not provide a detailed breakdown or justification for these costs. This lack of transparency could raise concerns about fiscal responsibility.
Complex Language: Some parts of the document, particularly those describing the "Obligation to Respond" and statutory authority, involve complex language rooted in legal and legislative background. This might be difficult for readers without a legal background to fully grasp.
Ambiguity in Respondent Numbers: The process seems to anticipate responses from 1,177 individuals resulting in 19,604 responses, but the basis for these estimates isn't clearly explained. This could lead to questions regarding their reliability or accuracy.
Automated Techniques Ambiguities: Although the document mentions minimizing burdens through the use of automated technology, it lacks specifics on how these proposed technologies or methods will be implemented, potentially leaving room for speculation or uncertainty regarding their effectiveness.
Broad Impact on the Public
The public broadly stands to benefit from the FCC's efforts to streamline information collection, reducing unnecessary burdens. However, if concerns about costs, clarity, and the potential impact on small businesses aren't addressed, this initiative could inadvertently increase complexity or burden, rather than alleviate it. Consequently, public engagement in this commenting process is crucial to ensure the outcomes are balanced and beneficial.
Specific Stakeholder Impacts
Businesses and Not-for-Profit Entities: These stakeholders might be directly affected by changes in data collection methods. Especially for small businesses, changes could have significant implications, either easing or complicating their compliance processes depending on how clearly the revisions are outlined and implemented.
Federal and State Agencies: As entities involved in regulatory or compliance matters, these agencies could be impacted by changes in how information is communicated and managed. Streamlined processes could enhance their operations, while ambiguities might necessitate additional resources to ensure compliance and understanding.
General Public and Communication Sector Participants: These groups have an implicit interest in the FCC's efforts, as improved data collection could lead to better-managed communications infrastructures. However, they could also be impacted by shifts in costs and operational dynamics within the communications industry.
The FCC's call for comments is an essential step in ensuring that any revisions or implications of these changes are well-understood and effectively implemented, benefiting all stakeholders involved.
Financial Assessment
The document under review outlines proposed changes in the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) information collection requirements related to specific frequency bands. A key financial reference in the document notes a total annual cost of $200,000 associated with these information collection activities.
Summary of Financial Allocation
The financial allocation mentioned pertains to costs incurred in the update and continued operation of processes for gathering certain information that is vital for managing frequency bands between 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and 92-95 GHz. This includes costs associated with compliance verification, record keeping, and reporting requirements that the FCC needs to fulfill its oversight responsibilities.
Relation to Identified Issues
The $200,000 cost remains a focal point for several questions. One of the issues raised is the absence of a detailed breakdown or justification for this amount. With no clear explanation of what the funds cover, stakeholders might speculate about potential inefficiencies or misallocations in spending. Furthermore, the lack of transparency regarding how these costs might relate to the practical work of license verification, or how they support the statutory responsibilities outlined, leaves a gap in understanding the necessity and prudence of the stated financial burden.
Moreover, while the document signals a revision in information collection processes, it does not clarify the financial impact of these revisions. Without such details, it remains difficult to ascertain if the changes are cost-effective or if more funds might be necessary beyond the stated annual cost. Additionally, the decision to use this financial figure without context contributes to the broader ambiguity regarding how this sum facilitates the FCC’s regulatory duties, particularly when considering the potential for technological solutions to reduce costs.
In summary, the $200,000 annual cost highlights some essential concerns regarding transparency and justification in federal spending, specifically within the context of the FCC's regulatory and oversight framework. More detailed information would allow for a better understanding of how efficiently these funds are utilized and whether they align with the stated objectives and responsibilities of the FCC.
Issues
• The document outlines a revision in the information collection requirements related to the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and 92-95 GHz Bands, but it lacks specific details on what the revisions entail, which could be seen as potentially unclear or ambiguous.
• The estimated total annual cost of $200,000 for the collection appears substantial, and there is no breakdown or justification provided for this amount, which might raise concerns about potential wasteful spending.
• The language used to describe the 'Obligation to Respond' and statutory authority references could be overly complex for some readers, making it difficult to understand without prior knowledge of the Communications Act of 1934.
• The document does not specify how the number of respondents (1,177 respondents; 19,604 responses) was determined, which could lead to ambiguity regarding the accuracy of these estimates.
• It is not explicitly clear how the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology are being proposed to minimize burdens except for a general statement, which might lead to questions about the implementation of such measures.