FR 2024-28152

Overview

Title

Proposed Information Collection Activity; Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Performance Data Form (Office of Management and Budget #0970-0449)

Agencies

ELI5 AI

In this announcement, a government agency wants to hear people’s thoughts on continuing to collect information about a program that helps low-income families pay for energy. They also want to make this information collection better starting in 2025, but they haven't explained everything about how it will get better.

Summary AI

The Administration for Children and Families, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is seeking public comments on extending and updating the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Performance Measures. This involves continuing the current data collection until June 2025 and introducing changes starting July 2025. These changes aim to collect more detailed data on the impact of federal funds and improve survey tools. The general public, especially those interested in the program, can submit their comments by January 31, 2025.

Abstract

The Administration for Children and Families (ACF) Office of Community Services (OCS) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is requesting an extension without change to the current version of the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Performance Measures (Office of Management and Budget (OMB) #0970-0449) for use through June 30,2025, and for approval of a revised version to use beginning July 1, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 95218
Document #: 2024-28152
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 95218-95219

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register invites public comments on proposed changes to the data collection process for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). Administered by the Administration for Children and Families within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, this program aims to help low-income households with their home energy needs. The document is particularly focused on updating the LIHEAP Performance Measures data collection, which tracks how effectively funds are used to support these households.

General Summary

The primary purpose of the document is to seek public input on extending the use of current performance measures until June 2025, while also introducing updates to these measures starting in July 2025. The updates are intended to provide a more detailed understanding of how federal funds are impacting the LIHEAP program and to refine the tools used for data collection. Comments from the public are particularly requested on various aspects of the data collection process, including its necessity, accuracy, utility, and the burden it imposes on respondents.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from the document which may need more clarity:

  1. Justification of Costs and Burden: The document mentions an "estimated total annual burden" of over 23,000 hours but does not clearly justify whether this burden is reasonable or necessary. Additionally, there is no discussion of the associated costs and their effectiveness relative to benefits.

  2. Impact of Changes: While the document discusses changes such as removing maximum income cutoffs from funding uses and replacing funding sources (CARES Act and ARPA) with the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, it fails to explain the rationale or potential impacts of these changes.

  3. Fraud Prevention: Despite references to past reports on fraud prevention, there is little detail on how the proposed changes will address or improve fraud prevention within LIHEAP.

  4. Clarity and Utility of Proposed Changes: Proposed alterations such as changing terminology in the data forms may seem trivial without a clear explanation of their importance or expected impact on reporting accuracy or efficiency.

Potential Impact on the Public

For the general public, the proposed changes might not immediately affect day-to-day life. However, they could influence the broader effectiveness and efficiency of LIHEAP in delivering benefits to those in need. Accurate and efficient data collection can improve the program's responsiveness and accountability, potentially leading to better support for eligible households.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For state governments and energy vendors involved in the program, these updates may introduce new reporting requirements. While this could increase the administrative burden, improved data collection might enhance their ability to deliver services effectively. Conversely, changes that are not well justified or explained could lead to confusion or inefficiencies.

In summary, while the document outlines a critical opportunity for public involvement in shaping LIHEAP's data collection methods, it leaves several critical questions unanswered. Further clarity on the proposed changes' impacts, costs, and benefits could help stakeholders provide more informed feedback, ultimately supporting the program's goals of assisting vulnerable households.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the cost associated with the collection of information and whether it is cost-effective.

  • • There are no specific details about how the proposed changes will improve the efficiency or accuracy of data collection.

  • • The document does not mention any feedback or results from past public comments on similar proposals, which could provide context for proposed changes.

  • • There is no discussion on whether the proposed burden hours (23,253.6 annually) have been justified or are considered reasonable.

  • • The potential impact of the removal of maximum income cutoffs from funding uses is not explained.

  • • The document does not specify how the information collected will be used to improve LIHEAP or assist in fraud prevention, despite mentioning a GAO report on fraud prevention controls.

  • • Language about "changing the name of Module 1" might be seen as trivial without explanation of its necessity or impact.

  • • The rationale for replacing specific funding sources (CARES Act and ARPA) with the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is not clearly provided.

  • • There is a lack of detailed explanation of how "non-administrative information technology enhancements" will contribute to program objectives.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,368
Sentences: 33
Entities: 139

Language

Nouns: 509
Verbs: 90
Adjectives: 67
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 56

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.91
Average Sentence Length:
41.45
Token Entropy:
5.27
Readability (ARI):
26.00

Reading Time

about 5 minutes