Overview
Title
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Fees for New Logical Ports in Connection With a New Connectivity Offering on Its Equity Options Platform
Agencies
ELI5 AI
Cboe BZX Exchange is adding new fees for special computer connections that help with trading, and these fees might be confusing or expensive for some smaller traders. They say the goal is to make trading more efficient and fair, but some people are worried it could make trading harder or costlier for those who don’t trade as much.
Summary AI
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. has introduced a new rule to implement fees for new types of logical ports on its equity options platform. This change is part of a new connectivity offering called "Unitized Logical Ports," which is meant to improve consistency and efficiency in trading by reducing the natural variance in processing messages. Alongside, Cboe BZX is also proposing Average Daily Order (ADO) and Average Daily Quote (ADQ) fees to regulate extensive use of the system's resources. These changes are optional for members, aimed at encouraging efficient use and ensuring that resources are not overused, impacting system performance.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Cboe BZX Exchange Fee Rule Proposal
The Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc., recently issued a notice about a new rule change concerning fees for "Unitized Logical Ports" on its equity options platform. This proposal aims to enhance trading consistency and efficiency by flattening the variance in message processing times inherent to previous systems. Additionally, the Exchange introduced fees tied to Average Daily Orders (ADO) and Average Daily Quotes (ADQ), intending to regulate extensive resource utilization.
Key Provisions and Changes
The proposed changes affect how members interact with the Exchange's system. The introduction of Unitized Logical Ports is voluntary, providing an opportunity for members to potentially benefit from a more streamlined and predictable trading experience. Likewise, the ADO and ADQ fees apply only when members exceed high usage thresholds, which are set to mitigate excessive strain on the system.
Potential Concerns and Considerations
The proposal presents several broad issues that may affect members and the market at large:
Cost Implications: The new fees, particularly for Unitized Logical Ports, might disproportionately benefit larger firms accustomed to handling the additional financial burden. Smaller or less resource-intensive traders could find these fees prohibitive, leading to concerns about equitable participation in the trading environment.
Complexity and Understanding: The tiered fee structure for Unitized Logical Port Sets, with progressive pricing, adds an additional layer of complexity. Smaller firms or those new to the marketplace may face challenges in accurately predicting trading costs, potentially influencing their willingness to engage with the platform.
Technical Terminology: The document's heavy use of technical jargon, such as terms like "unitized layer" and "BOEv3 architecture," could hinder comprehension for readers unfamiliar with these specific systems or terms. This complexity necessitates more straightforward communication or guidance from the Exchange to ensure all participants fully understand the impact on their trading strategies.
Impact on Different Stakeholders
The regulation change could have varying effects on different market participants:
Large Firms: Larger entities with robust trading capabilities and financial resources may better absorb these fees. Their existing infrastructure might allow the seamless integration of the new logical ports, thereby maintaining their market edge.
Smaller Traders: Conversely, independent traders and smaller firms may encounter difficulties due to the increased costs and complexity, potentially dissuading them from maintaining their current level of market participation.
Market Makers: The proposal took Market Maker input into account concerning quoting obligations. Despite the Exchange's reassurance that Market Makers can continue their vital liquidity role, concerns exist that the new rules might impact their operational costs.
Regulatory Goals vs. Revenue Concerns
While the Exchange purports that these changes aim to foster efficient network resource usage rather than generate revenue, the imposition of fees does resemble financial penalties for high-frequency users. Such disincentives could shift user behavior, but they also risk concentrating trading activity among those best able to navigate or afford the new structure. Transparency in how feedback from stakeholders was gathered and integrated into the proposal's development would further aid in addressing equity concerns among market participants.
In conclusion, while the intent of the proposal appears aligned with enhancing trading efficiency and system stability, its broader impact merits careful consideration, ensuring that accessibility for all market participants remains equitable.
Financial Assessment
The Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. document outlines several financial implications regarding the adoption of new fees for Unitized Logical Ports and other related services. These financial references include specific charges, allocations, and potential impacts on different market participants.
The document specifies the new fee structure for Unitized Logical Ports. Each Unitized Logical Port Set is priced progressively, meaning that the cost increases with the number of sets purchased. For example, a user purchasing 11 BOE Unitized Logical Port Sets would incur a charge of $32,000 per month. This pricing structure might pose challenges for smaller firms or individuals who find the progressive fee structure complex or burdensome.
Further elaboration is provided through an example where a member requests three BOE Unitized Logical Port Sets, one Bulk Unitized Logical Port Set, and one Purge Unitized Logical Port Set, resulting in a total charge of $8,000 for the BOE sets, $5,500 for the Bulk set, and $2,500 for the Purge set. The document cites the finite capacity of the exchange, which necessitates a cap on the number of Unitized Logical Ports that a firm can purchase. This limitation could prevent the overconsumption of resources and ensure fair access among members.
The Exchange’s current fee for logical ports is mentioned as $750 monthly per port for Logical and Purge Ports. Bulk Ports incur a fee of $1,500 for the first two and increase to $2,500 for any subsequent ports. These charges provide a context for comparison against the proposed new fees and illustrate the cost structure that firms currently face.
Additionally, the document introduces the concept of Average Daily Order (ADO) and Average Daily Quote (ADQ) fees. These are set in place for firms with submissions exceeding certain high thresholds, such as 2,000,000 daily orders or 250,000,000 daily quotes. Incremental usage beyond these thresholds incurs fees, such as a $0.050 charge per 20,000 ADQ increments within certain tiers, reaching a calculated fee of $662.50 in one specific example for the month. While designed to deter the exhaustion of system resources, this structure may influence larger firms more frequently, potentially benefiting them if they can manage to stay just below the thresholds without incurring additional fees.
Overall, the financial implications presented in the document, including the structured fees for logical and unitized ports, impact members based on their trading activity and resource usage. The tiered structure and its inherent complexity could be seen as both an attempt to control resource use and potentially a deterrent for smaller players who may find these costs prohibitive. The Exchange maintains that these fees are not intended to increase revenue, although they do place financial penalties on those engaging in high-frequency trading. This raises concerns about whether these changes disproportionately affect particular market participants, skewing the competitive balance.
Issues
• The document outlines fee changes for new Unitized Logical Ports that may not be necessary for all members, potentially favoring larger firms that can afford the additional cost.
• The tiered fee structure for Unitized Logical Port Sets, with progressive pricing, may complicate understanding for smaller firms or individuals less familiar with progressive fee schedules.
• The Average Daily Order (ADO) and Average Daily Quote (ADQ) fees apply only beyond high thresholds, potentially impacting smaller trading groups less frequently and disproportionately benefiting larger firms that exceed thresholds regularly.
• The document uses technical and legal jargon, such as 'unitized layer' and 'BOEv3 architecture', which may be unclear to readers not familiar with the specific trading systems and protocols.
• The complexity of the proposed fee structures (e.g., different unitized port types and tiered pricing) may make it difficult for members to accurately predict their costs, especially for those new to the Exchange or trading environment.
• Issues of fairness may arise as the new fee structures could primarily impact those members who are more resource-intensive, potentially deterring smaller traders from participating due to cost concerns.
• The document mentions feedback from market maker participants regarding quoting obligations but lacks transparency on how feedback was solicited or considered, which may raise concerns about equitable representation of stakeholder interests.
• The stated intention of the proposals to encourage efficient usage of network capacity may mask underlying motivations to increase revenue from high-frequency traders, though the Exchange claims the changes are not intended to raise revenue.
• The proposed ADO and ADQ fees, while purportedly not designed to raise revenue, do amount to a penalty on high-frequency users, possibly placing a disproportionate financial burden on those least able to diversify their trading activities.