FR 2024-28092

Overview

The document is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regarding a request by the National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation to extend the deadline for testing a well in New York. Originally, this testing was to be completed by December 1, 2024, but the company is seeking additional time until December 1, 2025, to fully analyze the gathered data.

Key Elements of the Notice

The notice establishes a procedure for public comment and intervention. Members of the public or interested parties have until December 9, 2024, to submit comments or file for intervention. The FERC will consider these inputs when deciding on the extension, particularly focusing on whether National Fuel has demonstrated sufficient cause for the extension. The Commission has clarified that while it will consider new arguments, it will not revisit past decisions about the project's approval or environmental compliance.

Significant Issues and Concerns

This notice raises several important issues:

1. Lack of Detailed Justification: The request for an extension does not provide specific reasons why the additional time is needed. This lack of transparency might be concerning for those interested in the project's progress and accountability. Knowing more about the challenges faced could help stakeholders and the public better understand the necessity of the request.

2. Complex Language: The legalistic language and detailed procedures might be overwhelming for the public or non-specialists wishing to engage with the process. Simplifying these instructions or providing additional guidance could encourage broader participation and understanding.

3. Criteria for 'Good Cause': The notice does not clearly define what constitutes 'good cause' for granting the extension. This could result in subjective interpretations, causing concerns about consistency and fairness in such decisions.

4. Consequences for Missing Deadlines: It is unclear what the ramifications would be if National Fuel does not complete its testing by the proposed new deadline. Clear information on potential consequences would help assess the seriousness of adhering to timelines.

5. Efficiency Concerns: The fact that multiple extensions have already been granted suggests possible inefficiencies or unexpected challenges in completing the testing. This pattern might reflect broader issues in project management.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Public Impact

The public has a window of opportunity to express opinions on this extension request, which is a crucial element for maintaining transparent regulatory practices. However, the accessibility of this participation process may be limited by the complexity of the procedures described.

Stakeholder Impact

• National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation: Positively, the extension would provide the company with additional time to ensure that all necessary analyses and data assessments are thoroughly completed. This could potentially lead to more reliable outcomes and decisions regarding the well.

• Local Communities: Particularly those near the Beech Hill Storage Field, communities could be affected by the change in timeline. For some, an extension might mean prolonged uncertainty or continued project-related impacts.

• Regulatory Bodies: For the FERC, handling repeated extension requests efficiently and transparently is a challenge that influences their credibility and the perception of fairness in their processes.

Conclusion

Overall, while the extension request could allow for more comprehensive analysis and potentially better project outcomes, the issues of transparency, clarity, and accountability remain central. Both the public and specific stakeholders have roles to play in this process, but it is essential that they have the necessary support and information to engage effectively.