FR 2024-27880

Overview

Title

Employment of Workers With Disabilities Under Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The U.S. Department of Labor wants to make sure that people with disabilities get paid the same minimum wage as everyone else, so they plan to stop letting some companies pay them less. This change is happening because now there are better job opportunities and protections for people with disabilities.

Summary AI

The U.S. Department of Labor is proposing to stop issuing certificates that allow employers to pay subminimum wages to workers with disabilities under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Section 14(c). This decision is based on the conclusion that such wages are no longer necessary due to improved employment opportunities and legal protections for individuals with disabilities. If enacted, the proposal would phase out new certificates immediately and existing ones over three years, ensuring that all affected workers transition to being paid at least the regular minimum wage. The Department believes that this change reflects broader societal shifts towards equality and inclusion for workers with disabilities.

Abstract

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or Act) authorizes the Secretary of Labor to issue certificates allowing employers to pay productivity-based subminimum wages to workers with disabilities, but only where such certificates are necessary to prevent the curtailment of opportunities for employment. Employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities have vastly expanded in recent decades, in part due to significant legal and policy developments. Based on that evidence, the Department has tentatively concluded that subminimum wages are no longer necessary to prevent the curtailment of employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities and thus proposes to phase out the issuance of section 14(c) certificates.

Citation: 89 FR 96466
Document #: 2024-27880
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 96466-96511

AnalysisAI

The document from the U.S. Department of Labor proposes a significant regulatory change regarding the payment of subminimum wages to workers with disabilities. This proposal aims to phase out Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which currently allows employers to pay lower than the federal minimum wage to disabled workers if their condition impacts their productivity. This change reflects the Department's conclusion that such subminimum wages are no longer necessary, given improved employment opportunities and legal protections for individuals with disabilities.

General Summary

The regulatory change suggests ceasing the issuance of new 14(c) certificates immediately and phasing out existing certificates over a three-year period. By the end of this time, all affected workers would transition to receiving at least the full federal minimum wage. The Department of Labor argues that legal and societal advancements have nullified the necessity of subminimum wages, aligning with broader shifts towards greater equality and inclusion for workers with disabilities.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several significant issues are notable within the document:

  • Complex Legal and Economic Detailing: The document is densely packed with legal terminology and economic assessments, which may be challenging for a general audience to fully comprehend.

  • Uncertainty in Economic Impacts on Small Entities: While the document acknowledges potential impacts on small entities, it lacks detailed, specific data regarding how these small businesses might be affected and their capacity to adapt.

  • Broad Impact Range on Employees: There is a wide range of potential impacts on employees transitioning from subminimum wage jobs, yet the information lacks precision, leading to uncertainties about the real-world effects on these workers.

  • Unquantified Adjustment Costs for Employers: The discussion of adjustment costs for employers is vague, not thoroughly quantified, and could result in unseen financial burdens.

Broader Public Impact

The proposed rule change would likely have several impacts on the public:

  • Increased Wage Floor: For workers with disabilities, this would mean a direct financial benefit, as they would be guaranteed at least the minimum wage, which may enhance their economic independence and quality of life.

  • Shift in Employment Practices: Employers, especially those in the non-profit sector that utilize 14(c) certificates, may need to adjust their business models. This may include finding alternative funding or reducing their workforce, potentially affecting the availability of jobs for individuals with disabilities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:

  • For Workers with Disabilities: The change could mean better financial stability and fewer disparities between them and non-disabled workers, leading to greater integration and self-respect.

  • For Society: The proposal aligns with modern principles of equality and human dignity, potentially improving societal perceptions of employing individuals with disabilities.

Negative Impacts:

  • For Some Employers: Employers that heavily rely on subminimum wage workers might face increased payroll costs, which could be burdensome, especially for smaller entities or non-profits.

  • Potential Loss of Employment: Workers currently in subminimum wage positions may face job insecurity if employers cannot afford to retain them at the higher wage.

In conclusion, this proposed change represents a significant policy shift intended to reflect evolving societal norms and legal principles regarding the employment of people with disabilities. While the intention is to promote fairness and equality, the document outlines a range of uncertainties concerning its implementation and potential impacts on both employers and employees. The Department invites public comment on these proposals, underlining the dynamic interplay between regulatory oversight and economic realities.

Financial Assessment

The document discusses a proposed rulemaking by the Department of Labor regarding the use of certificates that allow employers to pay subminimum wages to workers with disabilities under section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Numerous financial elements are addressed in the text.

Current Financial Allocations and Spending

The document references past and ongoing financial allocations aimed at supporting workers with disabilities. The Department of Education has awarded $177 million in grants to increase competitive integrated employment for people with disabilities. Furthermore, the Disability Employment Initiative, funded by the Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP) and the Department's Employment and Training Administration, disbursed over $123 million to 49 projects to improve employment outcomes for youth and adults with disabilities. These allocations aim to facilitate employment transitions for individuals affected by the gradual phase-out of section 14(c) certificates.

Assessment of Financial Impacts

The analysis portrays the complex financial interplay between the proposed regulatory changes and the entities affected. The document calculates various costs and savings that will occur across different timelines. Regulatory familiarization costs for employers are projected to total approximately $92,980 in the first year. Additionally, companies would save about $188.63 per application following the rule's finalization, which illustrates a potential annual saving of $84,318 if certain certificate renewal processes are stopped.

The text anticipates a significant monetary shift in employee earnings. Workers transitioning to full minimum wage jobs would see estimated aggregate earnings increase by $174.8 million per year. The document offers a breakdown of scenarios, providing transfer estimates where 75% of employees make this transition, resulting in $131.7 million in additional wages, accompanied by a reduction in payments of $27.1 million for those who may not transition to continued employment.

Financial Considerations Related to Issues

Several financial issues are highlighted in relation to this complex policy transition. The financial burden on small entities lacks robust supporting data, particularly concerning their ability to shoulder increased payroll costs or adapt operational models. There is also ambiguity regarding the potential impacts on workers' disability benefits, suggesting a need for clearer financial projections for individuals who might face changes in their entitlements due to wage increases.

Additionally, the document notes that current average hourly earnings for workers under section 14(c) certificates are $4.08, significantly below the Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. This highlights a critical financial gap the proposed rule aims to address.

In summary, while the document provides a foundational assessment of the economic impacts and prospective financial shifts tied to the proposed changes, it also notes areas of uncertainty and potential hidden costs that warrant further exploration and clarification. The reliance on aggregate estimates and broad projections underscores the need for more precise data to better understand the rule's real-world financial impacts on both small entities and individual workers.

Issues

  • • The document is lengthy and densely packed with legal and policy information, potentially making it hard for non-experts to understand.

  • • The economic impacts on small entities are noted, but there is a lack of detailed, specific data on how many small entities might be significantly affected and their ability to adapt.

  • • The range of potential impacts on employees transitioning from subminimum wage jobs is broad and lacks precise data, which may lead to uncertainties.

  • • The discussion of adjustment costs for employers is vague and not thoroughly quantified, which may result in hidden financial burdens.

  • • The regulatory familiarization cost model assumes all entities will review the rule immediately, potentially underestimating the burden over time.

  • • The potential impacts on workers' disability benefits are acknowledged but not fully explored or quantified, creating ambiguity around real-world effects.

  • • Potential costs to workers are mentioned, but there is an overall lack of detailed analysis or data on possible real-world scenarios for affected workers.

  • • Several assumptions about future behaviors of employers (e.g., continuing operations, retaining employees) lack supporting data, leading to uncertainty in the projected outcomes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 46
Words: 62,203
Sentences: 1,969
Entities: 4,470

Language

Nouns: 19,157
Verbs: 5,530
Adjectives: 3,875
Adverbs: 1,938
Numbers: 2,780

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.84
Average Sentence Length:
31.59
Token Entropy:
6.34
Readability (ARI):
25.64

Reading Time

about 4 hours