FR 2024-27577

Overview

Title

Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Scoping Period Requesting Comments on Environmental Issues for the Proposed Line 4010 Abandonment Project, and Notice of Public Scoping Session

Agencies

ELI5 AI

FERC is asking people to share their thoughts on stopping the use of a gas pipeline in Pennsylvania to keep everyone safe, and people need to send their ideas by December 19, 2024.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing an environmental review for the proposed Line 4010 Abandonment Project by Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC, which involves the removal and abandonment of pipeline facilities in Pennsylvania. The purpose of this notice is to open the public scoping process, allowing citizens and agencies to provide input on environmental issues related to the project. Comments on potential environmental effects and alternatives should be submitted to the Commission by December 19, 2024. The project is a response to safety concerns from a past incident and will comply with a federal order to abandon specific sections of the pipeline.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 96648
Document #: 2024-27577
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 96648-96650

AnalysisAI

The issued notice by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) concerns the proposed Line 4010 Abandonment Project by Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC. This project entails the removal and abandonment of certain pipeline facilities in Jefferson and Clarion Counties, Pennsylvania. The notice serves an important role in initiating a public scoping process, which is intended for gathering comments from both the public and agencies about the environmental impacts that might arise from the project. Public comments are requested by December 19, 2024, and are meant to focus on environmental effects, potential alternatives, and mitigation measures.

General Summary

The project is in compliance with a federal order resulting from past safety concerns on Line 4010, as issued by the United States Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). It involves the abandonment of 13.2 miles of pipeline and the removal of ten meter-stations. The notice outlines the process for public comment and provides detailed instructions on how comments can be submitted electronically or through traditional mail. Furthermore, it emphasizes the intention to evaluate the project under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which includes the potential impacts on various environmental resources.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from this notice. First, the document doesn't clarify the financial implications or potential costs associated with the project, which may concern taxpayers and stakeholders wanting to understand the economic impact. Additionally, while the document makes repeated references to methods like eComment and eFiling for public input, it might benefit from simpler, clearer language to avoid redundancy.

Another concern is the mention of potential impacts on landowners, especially relating to the company's right to use eminent domain if easement agreements aren’t reached. The document briefly touches upon this power but doesn’t thoroughly inform landowners of their rights and what to expect, which could leave them uncertain and anxious.

Moreover, the frequent use of acronyms such as NEPA, FERC, and PHMSA without consistent explanations might confuse individuals unfamiliar with these terms, potentially limiting effective public participation. Lastly, the document doesn't clarify what it considers as significant environmental issues, which could result in varied interpretations and uneven emphasis in public comments.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the public involvement in the comment process is crucial as it can affect decision-making regarding the environmental and possibly socioeconomic impacts of the project. However, if the public isn't adequately informed about the procedures or significance of their participation, this might limit their ability to contribute meaningfully.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For landowners directly affected by the pipeline, this project poses particular challenges. The potential use of eminent domain could significantly impact their property rights, so clarity on this issue is vital. The notice could be more informative about the rights and negotiation strategies in the event of disagreements over easements.

Moreover, local communities concerned about environmental impacts such as air and water quality, noise, and wildlife disruptions stand to be directly impacted by how well environmental issues are addressed during the scoping process. They have a vested interest in ensuring thorough evaluations and mitigation plans are developed.

On the positive side, the abandonment of an aging pipeline could potentially reduce safety risks and environmental hazards in the region, aligning with broader public and administrative goals for safe energy infrastructure.

In conclusion, while the notice is an important step in regulatory compliance and public engagement, it could benefit from simplified language and clearer explanations of technical terms and processes to promote better understanding and participation among all stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document provides insufficient specific details about the financial implications or costs associated with the Line 4010 Abandonment Project, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • The description of the public participation methods, eComment and eFiling, is somewhat repetitive and could be streamlined for clarity.

  • • The potential impacts on landowners, particularly regarding eminent domain, are mentioned, but the practical implications for affected parties might be insufficiently detailed to fully inform landowners of their rights and options.

  • • Acronyms such as NEPA, FERC, and PHMSA are used frequently without consistent explanation, which could be confusing for readers unfamiliar with these terms.

  • • The notice does not provide clear guidance on what constitutes an important environmental issue, which could lead to unequally weighted public comments.

  • • The document does not specify what will happen with the land after the pipeline abandonment beyond retaining the easement, leaving ambiguity about future developments or land use.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,733
Sentences: 102
Entities: 186

Language

Nouns: 902
Verbs: 271
Adjectives: 144
Adverbs: 29
Numbers: 93

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.23
Average Sentence Length:
26.79
Token Entropy:
5.69
Readability (ARI):
20.41

Reading Time

about 10 minutes