FR 2021-04193

The document from the Federal Register details the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)'s preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the East 300 Upgrade Project, proposed by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. This project aims to modify two existing compressor stations and construct a new one to enhance transportation capacity for the Consolidated Edison Company of New York. While the EA concludes that the project, with appropriate mitigating measures, is unlikely to significantly affect the environment, it invites public commentary on these findings by March 22, 2021.

Summary of the Document

FERC's document outlines a proposed project aimed at modifying existing compressor stations and building a new one across Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The purpose is to increase the capacity of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, supporting the needs of Consolidated Edison Company of New York. The EA finds that, assuming proper pollution prevention and other mitigations, the project would not have a major negative effect on the environmental quality. The document sets a deadline for public comments and provides various submission methods for public engagement.

Significant Issues and Concerns

1. Lack of Cost Details: The document omits financial specifics about the modifications and new constructions. This absence of detail raises concerns regarding the project's potential costs and associated taxpayer or consumer responsibilities.

2. Environmental Mitigation Ambiguities: There is a notable lack of specific measures that will be implemented to counteract potential environmental impacts. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to understand how such impacts will be managed.

3. Complexity of Participation Instructions: Although extensive instructions are provided for public comments, the complexity of these procedures could deter broad public participation, particularly from those unfamiliar with FERC operations.

4. Technical Language Barrier: The document employs technical language that might be challenging for the layperson to comprehend fully. This could limit the public's ability to engage with, understand, and form opinions on the project.

5. Lack of Clear Next Steps: While the document states that the EA is not a decision document, it does not clearly outline the subsequent steps in the decision-making process or the specific role public comments will play.

Broader Public Impact

The project has the potential to improve energy distribution capabilities significantly. However, the clarity of information provided to the public is critical. The document's language and complex procedures for public comment may hinder effective public engagement. Affected communities, particularly those near the project sites in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, might experience both direct environmental changes and indirect economic impacts.

Stakeholder Impact

• Local Communities: Residents near the proposed station sites might face environmental or noise concerns associated with the construction and operation of compressor stations. Transparency and clear communication about mitigation efforts would be vital to address resident concerns.

• Energy Consumers: If successful, the project could enhance energy reliability and possibly impede price increases by meeting growing energy demands effectively.

• Environmental Groups: Organizations focused on ecological preservation may be concerned about the adequacy of environmental protections, driving the need for more detailed clarification on pollution mitigation strategies.

In conclusion, while the project promises potentially significant benefits in energy capacity, attention must be paid to how the process is communicated and managed, ensuring broader understanding and fostering public trust and participation.