Overview
Title
60-Day Notice for the “NEA Panelist Profile Data”
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The National Endowment for the Arts wants to hear what people think about collecting information from special helpers they have, called panelists, to make things easier and quicker, like when you clean up fast to go play. People have 60 days to tell the Endowment what they think before the plan is official!
Summary AI
The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is seeking public and federal agency feedback on a proposed information collection of NEA panelist profile data. This effort is part of the NEA's ongoing initiative to reduce paperwork and make the process easier for respondents. Interested parties have 60 days from the publication date in the Federal Register to submit their comments. The NEA aims to ensure that the data collection process is efficient, useful, and minimally burdensome while maintaining high-quality information.
Abstract
The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This program helps to ensure that requested data is provided in the desired format; reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized; collection instruments are clearly understood; and the impact of collection requirements on respondents is properly assessed. Currently, the NEA is soliciting comments concerning the proposed information collection of NEA panelist profile data. A copy of the current information collection request can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the address section of this notice.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) has issued a notice asking for public and governmental input on a proposed collection of NEA panelist profile data. This initiative is part of the NEA's broader effort to streamline data collection processes, minimizing both the paperwork involved and the burden placed upon respondents. Observers and stakeholders are encouraged to provide their comments within a 60-day window from the notice's publication in the Federal Register.
General Summary
The NEA aims to collect profile data related to NEA panelists as efficiently as possible. This notice reflects an ongoing effort to refine how information is gathered, ensuring it meets the dual goals of practical utility for the agency and minimal inconvenience for those supplying the data. With the encouragement to provide feedback, the NEA hopes to make this process as seamless and effective as possible, factoring in public and federal agency perspectives.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several issues with the notice warrant attention:
Lack of Specificity: The document does not specify what the "NEA panelist profile data" precisely entails, which might leave respondents unclear regarding what is expected from them.
Data Use and Privacy: There is no detailed explanation of how the collected information will be used, potentially raising concerns about privacy and the purpose of data collection.
Electronic Submission Ambiguity: Without mentioning specific methods or platforms for electronic submissions, respondents may not know how to properly send their feedback or data.
Burden Estimate Methodology: The notice fails to discuss the methodologies or assumptions used in estimating the information collection burden, which could cast doubt on the accuracy of such estimates.
Timing and Deadlines: The phrase "within 60 days" might confuse some readers who are not familiar with Federal Register publication schedules, making it unclear when the deadline for comments actually falls.
Impact on the Public
The public stands to benefit from a streamlined and efficient process for collecting NEA panelist profile data. If properly structured, this method could reduce the time and resources spent on paperwork, making interactions with the NEA smoother for average citizens. However, transparency on data use and submission methods is critical to maintain public trust and to encourage participation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For those directly involved—such as potential NEA panelists, arts organizations, and related stakeholders—the notice signifies a possibility for reduced administrative workload and more clarity in communication with the NEA. However, ambiguities about data particulars and submission methodologies might impede participation and feedback, potentially leading to insufficient or non-representative data collection. By addressing these concerns, the NEA can create a more inclusive and efficient process that better serves the needs of these stakeholders.
Issues
• The document does not specify the exact nature or format of the 'NEA panelist profile data' to be collected, which may lead to ambiguity regarding what data is being requested.
• The notice does not provide any detailed information about how the information will be used, which could lead to concerns about data privacy and purpose.
• There is no mention of any specific electronic submission methods or platforms, which might leave respondents unclear about how they can submit their responses electronically.
• The document does not detail any specific methodologies or assumptions used in estimating the burden of the information collection, which could affect the accuracy of any burden estimates.
• No specific timeline or deadline details beyond 'within 60 days' from the publication date in the Federal Register are provided, which might be ambiguous for respondents unfamiliar with Federal Register publication practices.