FR 2021-04151

Overview

Title

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

Agencies

ELI5 AI

FEMA is asking people what they think about changes to special maps that show where floods might happen, so communities can be ready and get good insurance deals.

Summary AI

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is inviting comments on proposed flood hazard determinations for several communities. These proposals may involve changes to areas considered at risk of flooding, shown on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and in Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports. Communities need to adopt these updates to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The updated documents will also help determine flood insurance rates for new buildings. Comments on these proposals must be submitted by June 1, 2021.

Abstract

Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the contents of those buildings.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 12013
Document #: 2021-04151
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 12013-12014

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), part of the Department of Homeland Security, is a notice seeking comments on proposed changes to flood hazard determinations for various communities. These proposed changes may alter elements such as Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, and Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). The revisions are crucial for communities as they need to adopt these updates to continue participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which can influence insurance rates for new buildings.

General Summary

The document is a call for public input regarding FEMA's updated flood hazard determinations. These updates could impact flood-prone areas by possibly altering flood zone classifications. Beyond simply drawing new boundaries on maps, these changes carry significant implications for the affected communities, including potential changes to building codes and insurance premiums. Interested parties have until June 1, 2021, to submit their comments.

Issues and Concerns

While the document provides essential information, a few issues merit discussion. Firstly, the process for submitting feedback or appeals might be particularly complex, especially for individuals or local officials unfamiliar with federal procedures. This complexity might discourage participation, limiting valuable community input. Additionally, the reliance on external online resources and links could be problematic if these links become outdated or inaccessible, further complicating access to necessary information.

The mention of specifics, such as community map repository addresses, without including them within the text itself, may leave interested readers lacking crucial details. Moreover, the explanation regarding the usage of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is dense and might benefit from a simpler articulation to enhance public understanding.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the document's significance lies in its potential to affect individuals living in flood-prone areas by altering insurance premiums or building regulations based on revised flood zone maps. These updates aim to reflect more accurately the flood risks specific to each community, thereby enabling residents and local governments to prepare more effectively for potential flooding events.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, particularly property owners and local government officials, stand to be directly impacted by these proposed changes. For property owners, particularly those intending to build or remodel, the revised maps could result in higher insurance premiums or necessitate costly updates to comply with new building codes. Conversely, the ability to prepare for and mitigate flooding risks more effectively may offset some of this financial burden by reducing actual damage over time.

Local governments could face administrative and financial challenges in implementing these changes. They may need to adjust local ordinances and communicate effectively with residents to ensure compliance and understanding. However, similarly to property owners, these community-level adjustments could offer long-term benefits by minimizing flood-related damage and safety risks.

In summary, while the document aims to enhance community resilience against flooding, it also presents potential challenges in understanding and implementing the necessary changes. Hence, effective communication and simplification of the procedures are vital to maximizing public engagement and minimizing adverse impacts.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify any particular spending or budget allocation, which makes it difficult to audit for wasteful spending.

  • • The language regarding the use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) could be simplified for better clarity for the general public.

  • • The process for submitting comments and appeals might be complex for individuals or communities not familiar with federal procedures, potentially dissuading participation.

  • • The document relies heavily on external resources and links, which could be problematic if these links become outdated or inaccessible.

  • • The mention of 'specific community map repository addresses' in tables not included in the text could be seen as incomplete information for the reader.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 941
Sentences: 29
Entities: 80

Language

Nouns: 345
Verbs: 62
Adjectives: 49
Adverbs: 18
Numbers: 35

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.43
Average Sentence Length:
32.45
Token Entropy:
5.16
Readability (ARI):
24.06

Reading Time

about 3 minutes