FR 2021-04093

Overview

Title

Operation of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Over People; Delay of Effective Date; Correction

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The people in charge of airplane rules are waiting a little longer before they let small drones fly over people and cars—they were supposed to start on March 1, 2021, but now have to wait until March 16, 2021, so they can make sure everything is safe and ready.

Summary AI

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has delayed the effective date of a rule concerning the operation of small unmanned aircraft systems (drones) over people. Originally set to take effect on March 1, 2021, the rule is now delayed until March 16, 2021. This delay is in response to a directive for a "Regulatory Freeze Pending Review" issued by the Assistant to the President. The final rule will allow routine drone operations over people and moving vehicles and at night, with specific conditions, and includes changes to testing rules and certification presentations.

Abstract

In accordance with the memorandum of January 20, 2021, from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, titled "Regulatory Freeze Pending Review," the Agency delays the March 1, 2021 effective date of the final rule, Operation of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Over People, until March 16, 2021.

Type: Rule
Citation: 86 FR 11623
Document #: 2021-04093
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 11623-11624

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has announced a delay in the implementation of a new rule concerning the operation of small unmanned aircraft systems, often referred to as drones, over people. Initially set to be effective on March 1, 2021, this rule's enforcement has been deferred to March 16, 2021. This postponement is in response to a memorandum issued by the Assistant to the President calling for a "Regulatory Freeze Pending Review." This rule, once in effect, will permit certain routine drone operations over people, moving vehicles, and during nighttime hours under specified conditions. Additionally, it introduces changes to testing protocols and certification requirements for drone operators.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary issues outlined in the document is the potential ambiguity or delays caused by the "Regulatory Freeze Pending Review." This delay could create uncertainty for stakeholders who are preparing for compliance with the new regulations. Additionally, the document references specific regulatory sections and legal citations without providing context, which might be challenging for those unfamiliar with these details.

The FAA's decision to waive the typical public comment period, as described in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), could raise concerns among stakeholders. The urgency of this delay might lead to apprehensions about insufficient stakeholder engagement or a lack of transparency in regulatory processes. Furthermore, the document includes corrections to compliance dates, which could confuse parties who have already adjusted their plans according to the original schedule.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The delay in implementing the drone operation rule could have varying impacts. For the broader public, the postponement might mean a temporary hold on expanded drone operations, which some might view as beneficial for safety. For recreational or commercial drone operators, this delay could be seen as a setback, as it postpones the opportunity to conduct certain flights legally and expands operational scope.

For those who have prepared for compliance by the initial date, planning confusion might arise. Businesses involved in drone technology, such as service providers or manufacturers, might experience operational or financial impacts due to this regulatory delay. The FAA's actions could also affect governmental and non-governmental organizations employing drones for various purposes, from disaster response to infrastructure inspections, by complicating the implementation of planned operations.

Overall Evaluation

While this delay accommodates a high-level review of the rule to ensure due diligence, it underscores an essential balance between establishing firm regulatory timetables and maintaining the flexibility to revisit critical policy implementations. Stakeholders should use this period to better understand the implications of the rule and prepare for potential changes. The FAA should strive to clarify any ambiguities and provide further guidance to ensure a smooth transition when the rule becomes effective.

Issues

  • • The document references a 'Regulatory Freeze Pending Review' memorandum, which may create ambiguity or delays in regulatory processes and could impact stakeholders awaiting guidance on compliant operations.

  • • The summary and subsequent sections refer to specific sections (§ 107.29 and § 107.65) and their compliance dates without detailed explanation of what these sections entail, potentially making it difficult for readers unfamiliar with the regulation to understand the impact.

  • • The APA waiver described in the document could raise concerns about the lack of public comment or the expedited nature of the rule's delay, potentially creating trust issues among stakeholders or the public.

  • • Language such as 'RIN 2120-AK85' and legal citations (e.g., 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40101 note and 44807) may not be comprehensible to lay readers without further explanation.

  • • The correction of dates in specific sections may cause confusion if stakeholders or operators have already made plans based on the original dates.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,078
Sentences: 32
Entities: 96

Language

Nouns: 315
Verbs: 75
Adjectives: 66
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 84

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.44
Average Sentence Length:
33.69
Token Entropy:
5.15
Readability (ARI):
19.81

Reading Time

about 4 minutes