FR 2021-04083

Overview

Title

Environmental Management Advisory Board

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Energy is having an online meeting on March 24, 2021 about protecting and cleaning up the environment, and anyone who wants to watch or say something nice about it needs to tell them by March 17, 2021.

Summary AI

The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management announced a virtual meeting of the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) scheduled for March 24, 2021, from 2:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. ET. This meeting is open to the public and will be conducted online via Zoom. Members of the public wishing to attend or submit comments must contact Alyssa Harris by March 17, 2021. The meeting will include updates from leadership, voting on recommendations, and discussions on various environmental management topics.

Abstract

This notice announces an online virtual meeting of the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act requires that public notice of this conference call be announced in the Federal Register.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 11960
Document #: 2021-04083
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 11960-11960

AnalysisAI

The recent notice from the Department of Energy outlines an upcoming virtual meeting for the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB). This meeting is scheduled for March 24, 2021, running from 2:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. ET, and aims to address various issues within the realm of environmental management.

General Summary

The announcement provides the necessary information for attending an open virtual meeting held by EMAB. The document explains the purpose of the board, which is to offer independent advice and recommendations on corporate issues bettering the Environmental Management program of the Department of Energy. The meeting's agenda includes key discussions related to regulatory reform, waste disposition, and budget updates.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several issues arise from a closer examination of the notice. First, the transparency regarding financial expenditures related to the board’s activities is insufficient, leaving the public in the dark about potential spending. Secondly, the procedure for public participation, via comments and statements, lacks clarity. There is little guidance on the format or content expectations for these public contributions, which might deter citizen involvement.

The language used, such as terms like 'Designated Federal Officer' and 'special Government employees', may not be easily understood by the general public. This bureaucratic jargon could limit the effectiveness of the document in engaging and informing the community. Additionally, the document does not comprehensively communicate the significance of the meeting or the specific issues at hand, which could encourage public interest or participation beyond those with prior knowledge or expertise.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document opens a channel to participate in governmental discussions on environmental management. However, due to the obscure procedural details and technical language, members of the public who might otherwise contribute or observe may feel alienated. This meeting represents an opportunity for the public to engage with environmental governance, but accessibility remains a barrier.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved or affected by environmental management policies—such as environmental organizations, policy advocates, and community groups—the meeting serves as a crucial platform for influencing decisions within the Department of Energy. These groups could potentially have a significant impact through comments or participation, assuming they understand and can navigate the process for doing so.

Conclusively, while the document marks a positive step toward transparency and involvement in governmental processes, it still possesses hurdles that need addressing to ensure meaningful engagement by the public. Simplifying language, clarifying processes, and providing financial transparency could improve the impact of such notices, fostering broader participation and trust.

Issues

  • • The notice does not explicitly mention any expenditure details, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • The procedure for public participation via written statements and comments could be more explicitly detailed, such as the format and any specific topics or limits on comments.

  • • The document uses some bureaucratic language that might be hard for the general public to easily understand, such as 'Designated Federal Officer' and 'special Government employees'.

  • • The purpose of the meeting and its potential impact on the public or specific issues being addressed is not clearly communicated beyond general agenda items.

  • • There is no information on how the decision-making process works during the meeting, such as how votes are conducted or how public comments impact the board's decisions.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 526
Sentences: 25
Entities: 48

Language

Nouns: 182
Verbs: 33
Adjectives: 23
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.27
Average Sentence Length:
21.04
Token Entropy:
4.98
Readability (ARI):
17.28

Reading Time

about a minute or two