FR 2021-04081

General Summary of the Document

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has received a request from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to conduct a marine geophysical survey in the northeast Pacific Ocean, which may incidentally disturb northern sea otters. This survey is set to occur between May 1 and June 30, 2021. Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Service is considering issuing an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) that would allow certain disturbances to these marine mammals but not result in death. Up to 13 otters could be affected by the activities, which involve utilizing underwater sound waves to map geological structures. Public comments on this proposed authorization and its environmental assessment are being sought before making a final decision.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One concern is the document's complex and technical language, which may make it challenging for the general public to understand fully. For individuals without expertise in environmental regulations or marine biology, the details about the process and potential impacts on sea otters might not be easily accessible or comprehensible.

There is also a reliance on auditory data from other marine mammal species, like otariid pinnipeds, to assess the potential impact on northern sea otters. This approach may not accurately reflect the unique auditory capabilities and responses of sea otters, leading to potential inaccuracies in assessing impacts.

Moreover, the document hinges on several assumptions, particularly concerning the number of otters that might be affected and the behavioral effects of sound exposure. Such assumptions introduce a degree of uncertainty that could influence the accuracy of impact assessments.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, the document outlines activities that could impact the marine environment, and by extension, those who depend on it for commercial, recreational, or cultural activities. The public interest lies particularly in how such scientific activities balance the advancement of knowledge with the protection of vulnerable marine species.

The invitation for public comments suggests a degree of participatory governance, although the document does not clarify how comments will be utilized to influence the decision-making process. This lack of transparency might discourage public engagement or lead to skepticism about the weight given to local and public concerns.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For conservationists and environmental groups, this proposal raises serious concerns about the potential disruption to marine life, particularly given the degree of uncertainty and assumptions involved in the impact assessment. The possibility of habitat disturbance may be troubling, even if deemed temporary.

Conversely, scientific researchers and oceanographers could view the proposed activities as essential for expanding geological and environmental understanding. This kind of research can contribute valuable insights into earthquake risks and marine geology, potentially benefiting human communities in the long run.

Local communities involved in marine-based economies, such as fishing or tourism, might worry about the implications for marine life health and habitats, as even temporary disruptions could have cascading ecological impacts.

Overall, while the proposed survey could bring scientific benefits, it requires careful consideration of its potential impacts on marine life and local communities, underscoring the need for transparent communication and robust protective measures.