FR 2021-03996

Overview

Title

Applications for New Awards; Educational Technology, Media, and Materials for Individuals With Disabilities Program--Captioned and Described Educational Media Center

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to help schools get videos with words and sounds that are easy to understand for kids who might have trouble seeing or hearing. They are giving money to create a special place to make these videos, but it might be tricky for smaller groups to join because there are a lot of rules to follow.

Summary AI

The Department of Education is inviting applications for new awards under the Educational Technology, Media, and Materials for Individuals with Disabilities program for fiscal year 2021. The program aims to set up a Captioned and Described Educational Media Center to provide accessible educational materials, such as captioned and described video content, for students with disabilities. The center seeks to improve educational results for these students by developing and offering technology and media resources that are accessible and useful in classroom settings. The application submission deadline is April 27, 2021.

Abstract

The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2021 for Educational Technology, Media, and Materials for Individuals with Disabilities--Captioned and Described Educational Media Center, Assistance Listing Number 84.327N. This notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control number 1820-0028.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 11744
Document #: 2021-03996
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 11744-11751

AnalysisAI

The document from the Department of Education is announcing a funding opportunity aimed at supporting students with disabilities. It invites applications to establish a Captioned and Described Educational Media Center for fiscal year 2021. This initiative is part of a broader program designed to provide accessible educational materials, such as captioned videos and audio descriptions, which are particularly beneficial for students with hearing or vision impairments. The initiative aims to enhance educational outcomes by ensuring these resources are readily available for use in classrooms, including those involved in early learning and K-12 settings. The application deadline is set for April 27, 2021.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable concern is the complexity and technical nature of the application process. The detailed requirements, evaluation criteria, and expectation of extensive performance reporting might be overwhelming for smaller organizations without specialized grant-writing capabilities. Additionally, the document outlines a significant maximum award of $10,000,000 over five years but lacks clarity on how specific accountability measures will be enforced, which might make it challenging for applicants to understand how their success will be evaluated.

Furthermore, the requirement for collaboration with television program providers may inadvertently prioritize applicants with existing media partnerships, potentially disadvantaging smaller or newer organizations lacking such connections. The document also imposes several in-person or virtual meeting obligations, which could be financially or logistically burdensome for applicants with limited resources.

There is also ambiguity concerning the conditions that the Secretary of Education may impose on the grants, which could lead to uncertainty among potential applicants. Furthermore, the criteria defining "eligible users" of the program's resources could benefit from clarification to ensure fair access across diverse educational settings.

Broad Impact on the Public

The initiative has the potential to make a significant positive impact by increasing the accessibility of educational materials for students with disabilities. By promoting the use of technology to support learning, this program could help bridge educational gaps for students who are traditionally underserved due to sensory disabilities.

However, the complexity of the requirements could act as a barrier to entry for some organizations, particularly smaller nonprofits or schools that may lack the administrative capacity to navigate the application process. This could limit the program's reach and the diversity of applicants, potentially reducing the overall effectiveness of the initiative.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For schools and organizations with the resources to successfully navigate the application process, the grant could provide significant funding to improve their educational offerings for students with disabilities. It could foster collaborations with media partners and broaden access to valuable learning materials.

Conversely, smaller organizations might find the extensive application requirements restrictive. Without existing media relationships or the capacity for detailed evaluations, they may struggle to compete for funding. This limitation could inadvertently exclude innovative but resource-strapped entities from contributing creatively to the development of accessible educational content.

Overall, while the program holds promising potential for enhancing education for students with disabilities, the complexity and technical demands of the application process could deter participation from a diverse range of applicants. Simplifying these requirements and offering clearer guidance could help maximize the initiative's reach and impact.

Financial Assessment

The document issued by the Department of Education details financial aspects related to grant opportunities under the Educational Technology, Media, and Materials for Individuals with Disabilities Program. This commentary will explore the key financial elements mentioned in the notice, noting their implications and potential impact.

Overview of Financial Allocations

The Department of Education has allocated $2,000,000 in estimated available funds specifically for new awards under this program for fiscal year 2021. Furthermore, a maximum award of $10,000,000 is specified for the entire 60-month project period. This allocation outlines a substantial budget aiming to support the comprehensive development of a Captioned and Described Educational Media Center.

Funding Maximums and Potential Implications

The stipulation that no single award will exceed $10,000,000 highlights a significant investment intended to ensure the development and distribution of captioned and described educational content. Despite this substantial budget, the document notes complexities in evaluation and performance measures that might make it challenging for applicants to ensure accountability effectively. This might be discouraging or restrictive, especially for smaller organizations or those without specialized teams to navigate the intricate application process.

Spending Thresholds and Reporting Requirements

The document also mentions the simplified acquisition threshold, currently $250,000. Any selected awardees whose grants might exceed this threshold over the project period will be subjected to an integrity and performance review, ensuring that they comply with ethical and performance standards. This emphasizes accountability but could act as a deterrent for smaller entities that might find these requirements burdensome.

Additionally, organizations with federal funding exceeding $10,000,000 are required to submit certain integrity information semiannually under the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). This ensures consistent oversight over substantial federal investments, though it could place additional administrative demands on organizations managing multiple large-scale projects.

Impact on Smaller Organizations

The document addresses cost-sharing and indirect cost rates. Although there is no requirement for cost-sharing or matching, the program's use of an unrestricted indirect cost rate allows for some flexibility in managing overheads. However, the absence of specific administrative cost limitations means all expenses must be necessary and conform with federal guidelines, potentially leading to further complexities for applicants in budget planning and execution.

Administrative and Logistical Considerations

Finally, the requirement for attending several meetings in person or virtually may pose logistical and potential financial burdens on smaller or less resourced organizations. Though these meetings are crucial for maintaining transparency and effective project management, the associated costs and time commitments might be challenging for organizations with limited budgets and personnel.

In summary, while the financial allocations signify a strong federal commitment to enhancing educational accessibility for individuals with disabilities, the complex financial and administrative requirements may hinder participation from smaller entities. These organizations might struggle with the extensive documentation, evaluation measures, and compliance requirements, thereby questioning the inclusivity of the program's implementation strategy.

Issues

  • • The document outlines a maximum award of $10,000,000 for a 60-month project period, but the criteria and methods of evaluation for ensuring effectiveness and knowledge transfer are detailed but complex, making it challenging to determine specific accountability measures.

  • • The application requirements are extensive and the language used is highly technical, which might be prohibitive for smaller organizations or those without specialized grant application teams.

  • • The requirement for extensive evaluations, continuous performance reports, and specific conditions (e.g., high-risk assessments) may overwhelm some applicants, potentially excluding smaller or newer organizations with fewer resources.

  • • The document mentions that the Secretary may impose specific conditions without detailing what those conditions could be on the grant, which might lead to some ambiguity for the applicants.

  • • The language regarding the use of logic models is complex and requires significant expertise to understand and comply with, potentially dissuading smaller applicants.

  • • There is a heavy emphasis on collaboration with television program providers which might inadvertently favor organizations with existing media partnerships.

  • • The requirement for attending several in-person meetings, potentially via virtual arrangements, could still impose financial or logistical burdens on certain applicants, notably those with limited resources.

  • • The document lacks detail on how decisions for selecting media to be captioned or described will be made, possibly leading to questions of favoritism or bias.

  • • There's a recurring mention of using new technologies for accessibility without clear guidelines or examples, leaving it vague what is considered new or adequate technology.

  • • The criteria to define 'eligible users' could use further clarification to ensure equitable access and understanding across diverse educational settings.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 8
Words: 9,053
Sentences: 236
Entities: 474

Language

Nouns: 2,891
Verbs: 718
Adjectives: 538
Adverbs: 113
Numbers: 305

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.26
Average Sentence Length:
38.36
Token Entropy:
5.87
Readability (ARI):
26.16

Reading Time

about 38 minutes