Overview
Title
Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management and Budget; OMB Control Number 1625-0127
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Coast Guard wants permission to keep asking people questions about how boat areas are doing after big storms or problems, to help them fix things quickly. They're asking others to say what they think about this plan by the end of March 2021.
Summary AI
The U.S. Coast Guard has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval to continue collecting information for the Marine Transportation System Recovery. This information helps assess the status of ports and facilities following disruptions, such as natural disasters. The request for comments is open until March 29, 2021. The Coast Guard uses this data to devise recovery strategies to protect and repair essential infrastructure.
Abstract
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an Information Collection Request (ICR), abstracted below, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0127, Marine Transportation System Recovery; without change. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the public. Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork burdens commensurate with our performance of duties.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the U.S. Coast Guard, published in the Federal Register, announces a request for comments on its intention to extend an existing data collection initiative. This initiative, titled "Marine Transportation System Recovery," is designed to gather and track information about facilities and vessels vital to the transportation infrastructure in U.S. ports. The goal is to better prepare and respond to disruptions like natural disasters, ensuring the safety and functionality of port operations. Public comments are being solicited until March 29, 2021, to help evaluate and potentially refine this information collection process.
Summary of the Document
The document outlines a procedural step where the U.S. Coast Guard is seeking to continue its data collection under the framework of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This request is directed towards the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and aims to gather insights and feedback from the public. Comments are invited on various aspects, such as the practicality and necessity of the data being collected, and suggestions for improving its quality or reducing the associated administrative burden on respondents, mainly owners or operators of U.S. waterfront facilities.
Significant Issues and Concerns
The language of the document is laden with technical and governmental jargon, which can be challenging for the average reader to interpret. It references specific U.S. Code titles and procedures that may not be familiar to those outside of legal or governmental sectors.
Moreover, there is a lack of detailed instructions for respondents about the process and expectations of the data collection, which could leave some stakeholders unclear about their responsibilities. Additionally, the document does not clearly state the circumstances under which the information collection should occur, using vague language like "on occasion." Also absent is an explanation for the increased number of responses, which has led to a rise in the hourly burden estimate.
Concerns regarding the financial impact on stakeholders are not addressed, potentially leaving respondents apprehensive about any hidden costs. Finally, there are no details concerning the privacy and security measures for the collected data, a critical oversight given the sensitivity of transportation and infrastructure-related information.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The document may broadly affect the public by contributing to the U.S. Coast Guard’s efforts to safeguard maritime infrastructure, which is fundamental to the U.S. economy and national security. A well-protected and efficiently recoverable transportation system enhances general public welfare by ensuring the constant flow of goods and services.
For specific stakeholders, particularly those who operate waterfront facilities, this document represents a regulatory obligation that may complicate their operations. The lack of clarity on procedural expectations could negatively affect these stakeholders, leading to potential non-compliance due to misunderstandings or inadequate guidance.
Conversely, effective data collection could benefit these stakeholders by facilitating faster recovery of operations after disruptions. The enhanced understanding of infrastructure vulnerabilities could lead to more targeted and efficient recovery efforts, potentially reducing downtime and mitigating financial losses in the aftermath of incidents.
To address these issues, the U.S. Coast Guard should provide additional explanatory materials that clarify the practical aspects of the data collection process. Moreover, reassurance regarding data privacy and any potential costs would likely increase stakeholder confidence and compliance.
Issues
• The document contains complex governmental jargon that might be difficult for the average reader to understand, such as references to specific U.S. Code titles and OMB procedures.
• There is no detailed explanation for how respondents (owners or operators of U.S. waterfront facilities) are expected to gather the necessary information, which could lead to confusion.
• The wording around the frequency of information collection ('On occasion') is vague and does not specify what triggers these occasions.
• The 'Hour Burden Estimate' states an increase in burden hours due to more responses but does not provide information on why there is an increase in responses.
• There is no mention of any potential financial costs to respondents, which may be important for those affected to understand the implications of the information collection requirement.
• The document does not specify what measures, if any, are being taken to ensure data privacy and security for the respondents.