Overview
Title
FM Approvals LLC: Application for Expansion of Recognition and Proposed Modification to the NRTL Program's List of Appropriate Test Standards
Agencies
ELI5 AI
OSHA is looking to approve new ways that FM Approvals LLC can test things to make sure they're safe, and they're asking people to share what they think before they decide.
Summary AI
OSHA has announced that FM Approvals LLC is applying for an expansion of its recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). This expansion includes five new test standards for its scope of recognition. OSHA also proposes adding a new test standard to the NRTL Program's list, subject to public comment. The public can submit feedback by March 15, 2021, before OSHA makes a final decision.
Abstract
In this notice, OSHA announces the application of FM Approvals LLC for expansion of recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) and presents the agency's preliminary finding to grant the application. Additionally, OSHA proposes to add one test standard to the NRTL Program's list of appropriate test standards.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
This document provides information regarding the application by FM Approvals LLC to expand its recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). FM Approvals seeks to include five additional test standards within its scope of recognition. In addition, OSHA proposes the inclusion of a new test standard into the list of standards that are appropriate for the NRTL Program. This notice invites public comment on these proposals before a decision is made, with a deadline set for March 15, 2021.
Significant Issues and Concerns
The document presents several potential issues and concerns worth noting:
Technical Jargon: The document is laden with technical terms and regulatory references that may not be easily understood by those unfamiliar with the NRTL Program and its requirements.
Public Comment Submission: Instructions on how to submit comments, particularly requests for extensions, could be clearer. The document briefly mentions a limitation on the extension period without an example or more detailed explanation.
Multiple Contact Points: The document provides various contact persons and modes of communication, which might confuse individuals seeking assistance or further information.
Test Standard Selection Transparency: There is little information explaining how or why the new test standards were chosen for recognition. Understanding the distinction between these and existing standards might help in evaluating the proposals thoroughly.
Privacy Concerns: While there is a caution against submitting personal information, more detailed guidance on ensuring privacy could strengthen protections for contributors.
On-site Review: The reasons for not performing on-site reviews of the application by OSHA should be more explicitly described to alleviate concerns about thoroughness.
Criteria for Test Standards: The criteria for determining what makes a test standard “appropriate” are not provided, which could hinder a full understanding of the selection process.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the document sets out a process for potentially improving safety standards through the introduction of new test standards. The expansion of recognition for FM Approvals LLC may enhance product safety by covering more types and aspects of product testing.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
General Public: The introduction of more robust testing standards can improve consumer safety by ensuring products have been rigorously tested against a wider array of benchmarks.
Manufacturers and Industry: Companies involved in producing products that need certification might engage with more NRTLs or adjust existing practices. The addition of new test standards may bring about compliance challenges and potentially increase costs associated with meeting newly established benchmarks.
FM Approvals LLC: Obtaining an expanded recognition solidifies its reputation and may enhance its business by allowing it to certify a broader range of products.
OSHA: The organization's proposal to include a new standard indicates a proactive step towards keeping the NRTL Program aligned with evolving safety and industry needs.
In conclusion, while the notice provides an opportunity for public participation in shaping safety standards, addressing the noted issues could facilitate a clearer and more inclusive decision-making process.
Issues
• The document uses technical jargon related to the Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) program, which may be difficult for non-experts to understand.
• The process for public comment submission could benefit from more clarity, especially regarding extensions and limitations on extensions.
• The document references multiple contact persons and methods for inquiries, which may lead to confusion for individuals seeking assistance.
• There is a lack of transparency regarding why certain test standards were chosen for recognition or how they differ from existing standards.
• The requirement for the inclusion of an agency name and docket number in submissions could be made clearer, perhaps by providing an example.
• The reasons for not performing on-site reviews for the application could be explained more clearly.
• The document does not provide detailed criteria for what constitutes an 'appropriate test standard'.
• Potential privacy concerns are briefly mentioned regarding submission of personal information, but more extensive guidance could be helpful.