Overview
Title
Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council is having online meetings to talk about how to take care of fish in certain areas. Someone will answer questions not meant for everyone because of a secret reason called "litigation," and they might suggest some new rules for fish protection.
Summary AI
The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council is holding a series of meetings on fishery management between March 16 and March 25, 2021. These meetings will primarily take place online via WebEx, but there will be additional host sites in Guam, Saipan, and American Samoa. During the meetings, the Council will discuss various issues, including fishery management plans, species protection measures, and financial reports. A portion of the meeting will be closed to the public due to litigation matters. Some actions may lead to the proposal of new regulations to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce.
Abstract
The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold its 139th Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC), Pelagic and International Standing Committee, Executive and Budget Standing Committee, and 185th Council meetings to take actions on fishery management issues in the Western Pacific Region. A portion of the Council's Executive and Budget Standing Committee meeting will be closed to the public for a briefing on litigation by counsel.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The recent notice from the Federal Register regarding the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council outlines several upcoming meetings focused on fishery management in the Western Pacific Region scheduled between March 16 and March 25, 2021. These meetings will be conducted mainly online via WebEx, with additional host sites located in Guam, Saipan, and American Samoa. The agenda includes plans to discuss various fishery management and conservation issues that could culminate in recommendations for new regulations to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce. Additionally, part of the meeting will be closed to address ongoing litigation matters.
Summary of the Document
The document informs the public about multiple meetings organized by the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council. These meetings aim to address fishing management strategies, discuss species protection measures, and evaluate financial reports. They also present an opportunity for public participation, although some sessions are reserved for legal discussions, which are closed to the public. The notice includes a detailed agenda covering diverse topics such as fishery plans, seabird and shark interaction mitigation, and updates to stock assessments for certain fish species.
Issues and Concerns
One highlighted concern is the partial closure of the Executive and Budget Standing Committee meeting for litigation purposes. This poses issues surrounding transparency, as the specifics of the litigation are not publicly disclosed. This closure may leave interested parties questioning what legal matters need to be kept confidential and why they cannot be discussed publicly.
Another point of contention is the reference to Executive Order 14008, which addresses the climate crisis. The document does not explicitly link this order with the specific fishery issues under discussion. This ambiguity may lead to confusion about the impact of this Executive Order on the outlined agendas.
Furthermore, regulatory actions are mentioned without detailed cost considerations. For instance, changes in Hawaii's longline fishery regulations could have financial implications that are not immediately clear, which might cause concern about the potential for inefficient spending if these implications are not thoroughly vetted.
The language used could also pose an issue due to its complexity, which may not be understandable to all readers. Terms such as "Conceptual Frame for Workshop on Bigeye Tuna Management" may obscure the document’s intent or relevance for individuals not familiar with scientific or regulatory jargon.
Lastly, the document touches on topics such as the "Socio-Economic Context for Fisher-Shark Interaction in the Marianas" without detailed explanation, which might make it difficult to assess its significance or practical implications.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the document ensures that the public is informed of and can participate in discussions about significant fishery management issues. The meetings could lead to the creation or amendment of regulations, thereby potentially impacting fishing practices, conservation efforts, and economic conditions in the Western Pacific Region.
For specific stakeholders, such as fishers and environmental groups, these discussions provide an opportunity to voice concerns and influence decision-making processes. Changes in regulations, like those discussed in the meetings, can have significant effects on fishing businesses, affecting operations and profitability. For environmental advocates, the focus on conservation measures like seabird mitigation and shark interactions may represent a positive step toward ecological sustainability.
In summary, while the document provides crucial information on upcoming meetings and potential regulatory changes, some aspects require clearer communication and transparency to fully engage and inform both the general public and stakeholders.
Issues
• The document mentions 'a partially closed meeting' for the Executive and Budget Standing Committee without providing a detailed explanation for why it is closed and what the litigation concerns. This lack of transparency might be of concern.
• The document references 'NMFS Briefing on Executive Order 14008 on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad' without elaborating on how this Executive Order is specifically related to the fishery management issues being discussed, creating potential ambiguity.
• The repeated mention of regulatory actions, such as 'Wire Leader Regulatory Amendment in Hawaii Longline Fisheries' and 'Updates to the Deep 7 Bottomfish Annual Catch Limits', without specific financial implications or cost assessments may raise concerns regarding potential wasteful spending if not properly reviewed.
• Language such as 'Conceptual Frame for Workshop on Bigeye Tuna Management in Western Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) Longline Fisheries' may be overly complex for readers not familiar with the subject matter, potentially leading to misunderstandings.
• The document mentions 'Socio-Economic Context for Fisher-Shark Interaction in the Marianas', which might require further explanation to assess its relevance and necessity, indicating possible unclear language in context.