Overview
Title
Amendment of Class E Airspace; Cambridge, NE
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The FAA decided to make the sky space around a Nebraska airport a bit bigger to help airplanes fly safely, like giving planes more room to play. They also took away an old tool they didn't need anymore, like cleaning up a toy box.
Summary AI
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a final rule modifying the Class E airspace over Cambridge Municipal Airport in Nebraska. This change involves expanding the airspace radius from 6.4 miles to 7.5 miles and correcting the geographical coordinates to better manage flights using instrument flight rules (IFR). Additionally, it involves removing a navigation aid called the Harry Strunk NDB, which is no longer needed. The FAA determined these updates would not significantly impact the environment or small businesses.
Abstract
This action modifies the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface to properly contain instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at the airport. This action also removes the Harry Strunk NDB from the Class E5 text header and airspace description. Additionally, this action corrects the airport's geographic coordinates.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Document
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, has implemented a rule that modifies the airspace around Cambridge Municipal Airport in Nebraska. This adjustment changes the Class E airspace, which extends from 700 feet above the ground level, by increasing its radius from 6.4 miles to 7.5 miles to improve the management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations. The rule also corrects the airport's geographical coordinates and removes an outdated navigation aid called the Harry Strunk NDB. These changes are set to take effect on June 17, 2021, and are intended to promote aviation safety and efficiency.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One of the primary concerns with the document is its technical language and reference to specific FAA Orders and regulations, which could be difficult for non-experts to understand. The document also addresses environmental considerations, determining that these changes will not have a significant impact, but does not provide a detailed explanation, which might leave some readers questioning the basis of this conclusion.
Additionally, the withdrawal of the Harry Strunk NDB could concern stakeholders who relied on this navigation aid. The document lacks detailed information on how these stakeholders will be affected or what steps, if any, will be taken to mitigate such impacts. Lastly, while the document states that there will be minimal impact, it does not provide information on any potential costs or funding required to implement these changes, which might raise questions about financial implications.
Impact on the Public
The document’s changes to airspace might not directly impact the general public, but they are crucial for ensuring that aircraft operations are conducted safely and efficiently, potentially benefiting anyone using air travel services in the region. Improved IFR operations can enhance flight safety and punctuality, indirectly benefiting passengers and local businesses dependent on reliable air services.
However, due to the technical nature of the document, the general public might find it challenging to fully comprehend the scope and rationale of these changes, which could result in misunderstandings about their implications.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders directly involved in aviation, such as pilots and airport authorities, these changes will necessitate updates in their operational practices to align with the new airspace designations. The removal of the Harry Strunk NDB might require pilots and operators to adjust their navigational practices as well.
Similarly, aviation service providers and local air traffic controllers will need to incorporate these changes into their procedures, which could involve additional training or updates in navigation equipment.
For those previously relying on the decommissioned navigation aid, the impact could be more profound unless alternative solutions are provided. Such stakeholders might require support to adapt to these changes without disrupting their operations or adding undue burden.
Issues
• The document contains technical language that may be difficult for non-experts to understand, especially the references to specific FAA Orders and amendments.
• The reference to the 'National Archives and Records Administration' and how to access FAA Order 7400.11E could be more clearly explained for general public understanding.
• The mention of specific geographical coordinates and measurements (e.g., 7.5-mile radius) assumes knowledge of geographical data interpretation, which might not be clear to all readers.
• No information is provided on the cost or funding involved in implementing these amendments to the airspace, which could raise questions about potential spending and related impacts.
• The document does not specify how the removal of the Harry Strunk NDB might affect local navigation or stakeholders who previously relied on it, potentially omitting important information for affected parties.
• The document assumes familiarity with various federal regulations and environmental policies (e.g., Executive Order 12866), which may not be immediately clear to all readers.