FR 2021-03867

The document from the Federal Register involves a proposed information collection by the Administration for Community Living (ACL) aimed at studying the impact of COVID-19 and opioid abuse on Adult Protective Service (APS) programs. The study has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review as per the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This study seeks to explore the challenges faced by APS due to opioid abuse and the additional complications introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic. The data collected will help in guiding ACL and other federal partners in better allocating resources to combat these issues.

General Summary

The central aim of the document is to inform the public about the ACL's plan to gather information on APS programs with respect to the dual crises of opioid abuse and the COVID-19 pandemic. The study intends to investigate how these issues impact APS caseloads, explore the investigative methods and interventions used, and identify the additional services needed. The findings will be shared through various platforms to aid in improving APS responses.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several notable issues arise from the document:

• Budget Transparency: The document does not mention the estimated costs associated with conducting this study. Without this information, it is challenging to assess whether financial resources are being spent efficiently or potentially wasted.

• Technical Language: The document's language may be too complex for a general audience, which could result in misunderstandings about the study's objectives and methods.

• Repetition and Clarity: There is a repetitive phrase in the summary section about the study's requirements, which may confuse readers.

• Implementation Details: While the goals of the study are clear, the document does not elaborate on how the findings will be practically applied or what specific benefits are expected from the improved targeting of resources.

• Lack of Public Engagement: There were no public comments on a previous notice, which might indicate communication barriers or a lack of awareness among relevant stakeholders about the study.

• Transparency in Study Execution: The document does not clarify whether there will be any competitive bidding or clear criteria for selecting entities to conduct the study, which could raise concerns about favoritism or lack of transparency.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, the document signifies an ongoing effort by federal agencies to tackle crucial issues affecting vulnerable populations—namely, elder abuse exacerbated by opioid misuse, and the broader impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Successful execution and transparent dissemination of the study's results could lead to more effective interventions and support systems.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

• Elderly and Vulnerable Populations: A deeper understanding of the challenges faced by these groups could lead to enhanced services and better protection measures.

• APS and Community Services Providers: Findings from the study may inform more effective practices and policies, easing the burden on systems under pressure from complex caseloads.

• Healthcare and Law Enforcement: Insights from the study could help tailor responses to opioid-related challenges, potentially improving coordination across health and emergency services.

In summary, while the intentions of the study appear commendable, the lack of detailed information on certain aspects might impede stakeholders' full engagement and understanding of the potential benefits. Ensuring clearer communication, budget transparency, and wider public involvement could enhance the study's impact and acceptance.