FR 2021-03832

Overview

Title

New Postal Products

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Postal Regulatory Commission is letting people know that they're looking at a new deal the Postal Service wants to make. They want people to share their thoughts about the deal by February 26, 2021.

Summary AI

The Postal Regulatory Commission is informing the public about new filings related to negotiated service agreements by the Postal Service. These agreements might involve changes to the competitive or market dominant product lists. The Commission is inviting public comments on these filings, which are due by February 26, 2021. For those unable to submit comments online, alternative filing options are available by contacting David A. Trissell.

Abstract

The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing for the Commission's consideration concerning a negotiated service agreement. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 11340
Document #: 2021-03832
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 11340-11341

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register is a notice from the Postal Regulatory Commission regarding a recent filing by the Postal Service. This filing concerns a negotiated service agreement, which could lead to changes in the lists of market dominant or competitive products offered by the Postal Service. The Commission is open to receiving public comments on this filing until February 26, 2021. The notice also provides guidance on how individuals can submit comments, especially those who might face challenges in submitting them electronically.

General Summary

The notice informs the public about potential changes in Postal Service products, which might involve adding or removing certain services from established product categories. This regulatory process aims to ensure transparency and invite opinions from the public, thereby fostering an inclusive decision-making environment. The notice specifically points to a filing, given the docket numbers MC2021-70 and CP2021-73, and encourages public engagement by listing Christopher C. Mohr as the representative for the public's interests.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues may arise when interpreting the document. Firstly, while the notice aims to be transparent, it lacks specific details about the nature or terms of the negotiated service agreement. This absence of information might leave readers wondering if the agreement could lead to inefficiencies or biases within the Postal Service.

Additionally, the document mentions non-public parts of the Postal Service's request, stating they require specific compliance criteria described under 39 CFR 3011.301. For a layperson, these references could be confusing, as it assumes a familiarity with legal citations and regulations not commonly known by the public. Furthermore, numerous legal references (e.g., various U.S.C. sections and CFR parts) embedded in the text may appear dense and inaccessible to readers lacking legal expertise.

Impact on the Public

This notice is significant for the public as it informs them of potential changes that could affect the availability and pricing of postal services. By inviting public comments, the Commission allows citizens to voice their opinions on these potential changes, ultimately contributing to decisions that resonate with the public interest. This process exemplifies transparency in governmental operations and empowers individuals to partake in regulatory practices actively.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The document may impact different stakeholders in various ways:

  1. General Public: The public stands to benefit from this transparent process, which encourages public feedback on potential service changes. However, the complexity of legal jargon might deter some individuals from participating fully.

  2. Postal Service: As the primary entity proposing changes, the Postal Service must navigate public opinion and regulatory scrutiny. Positive public feedback might bolster the Postal Service's initiatives, while negative feedback could necessitate adjustments and potential delays.

  3. Businesses and Frequent Mailers: Businesses reliant on postal services might experience operational impacts based on the outcome of these proposed changes. They may have a vested interest in ensuring that any adjustments favor efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

  4. Legal and Regulatory Experts: Those familiar with postal regulations may find opportunities to guide discussions and interpret such documents for less-informed stakeholders, thus playing a crucial advisory role.

Overall, this regulatory notice exemplifies participatory governance, encouraging various stakeholders to engage actively with the evolving landscape of postal services.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details on the nature or terms of the negotiated service agreement, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The reference to 'Non-public portions of the Postal Service's request(s), if any, can be accessed through compliance with the requirements of 39 CFR 3011.301' may be vague for some readers who are not familiar with the requirements of 39 CFR 3011.301.

  • • The document references several U.S.C. sections and CFR parts without explanation, which might be overly complex for readers not familiar with these statutes and regulations.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 677
Sentences: 29
Entities: 81

Language

Nouns: 240
Verbs: 38
Adjectives: 31
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 60

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.12
Average Sentence Length:
23.34
Token Entropy:
5.03
Readability (ARI):
17.65

Reading Time

about 2 minutes