FR 2021-03810

The document in question is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), declaring the reception of several natural gas pipeline rate and refund report filings. These filings were submitted by various pipeline companies on February 17, 2021, and relate to rate adjustments and agreements. The companies involved include entities like Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC and Northern Natural Gas Company. These submissions have specified dates on which they become effective, spanning from February to April 2021.

The primary function of such a notice is to inform interested parties, including the general public, of changes and developments in natural gas pipeline rates. This transparency is essential as it allows stakeholders to access the details and provide comments or objections within a stipulated timeline. The public can access the filings by querying the docket numbers in the Commission's eLibrary system.

Significant Issues or Concerns

While the document's primary goal is to inform, several aspects could challenge comprehension and engagement:

• Lack of Abstract and Use of Legal Language: The absence of an abstract might make it difficult for readers to quickly grasp the essence of the document. Furthermore, the document employs specialized legal terminology, such as "§ 4(d) Rate Filing," which might not be readily accessible to individuals unfamiliar with regulatory processes.

• Density of Information: The text lists numerous dates and docket numbers, which might overwhelm readers, making it difficult to discern the main message without getting lost in details.

• Brevity of Descriptions: Descriptions for each filing are brief, potentially leaving readers without a clear understanding of the implications or context surrounding each company's submission.

• Ambiguity in Intervention Consequences: The statement that "Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding" could confuse readers. It implies a dual-level system of addressing concerns but does not clearly define the stakes or outcomes associated with either action.

Impact on the Public

This document serves an important role in maintaining the transparency and regulatory oversight of natural gas rates, which are crucial for consumer protection and market stability. By inviting public comment, FERC ensures that citizens have a voice in these changes, though the complexity of the document may deter participation.

Impact on Stakeholders

For general consumers, fluctuations in natural gas pipeline rates could lead to changes in energy costs. Awareness of such filings allows interested parties to understand potential implications for their energy expenses.

For the companies involved, these filings represent the execution of strategic financial and legal planning. Rate adjustments or negotiated agreements are vital for managing costs and regulatory compliance, thus directly impacting their operational profitability and market competitiveness.

Each organization has a vested interest in the outcome of these proceedings. Those able to successfully intervene could influence the regulatory environment in which they operate, potentially impacting their financial performance favorably.

Conclusion

While the document fulfills its mandate of notifying the public and stakeholders about important regulatory filings, its effectiveness could be enhanced through clearer language and more context. Simplifying legal terms, providing richer descriptions, and clarifying procedural statements could make such documents more accessible and engaging for a broader audience. Such improvements would empower more stakeholders to participate in the regulatory process, fostering a more inclusive dialogue around energy policy and regulation.