Overview
Title
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The people who work at a place called the Treasury want to keep everyone safe from getting sick, so they're planning to keep track of people who might have caught or been near someone with a sickness when visiting. They promise to be careful with the information they collect and only share it when they really need to, but some people are curious about how they'll protect this info and how long they'll keep it.
Summary AI
The Department of the Treasury has proposed a new system of records titled "Health Screening and Contact Tracing Records" to track individuals who have been infected with or exposed to communicable diseases while at Treasury facilities or events. This system, established under the Privacy Act of 1974, aims to protect the health of Treasury personnel and visitors by collecting necessary information for health screening and contact tracing. Treasury will use these records to comply with health and safety regulations, respond to public health emergencies, and reduce the transmission of infectious diseases. Personal information, including health data, may be shared with relevant authorities for public health purposes while maintaining privacy safeguards.
Abstract
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Department of the Treasury ("Treasury" or the "Department") (including Treasury bureaus, offices, and other subcomponents), proposes to establish a new Treasury system of records titled, "Department of the Treasury .020-- Health Screening and Contact Tracing Records." Treasury collects these records when it knows or suspects that a person who was infected with a communicable disease came in close physical proximity to or had physical contact with other persons while working in or visiting a Treasury facility (including Treasury sponsored events in non-Treasury facilities), and Treasury determines that the collection of such records is necessary to protect the health of Treasury personnel (meaning employees, grantees, contractors, and interns), and Treasury visitors (which includes non-Treasury federal employees and contractors, detailees from other federal agencies working at a Treasury facility, and members of the public who visit a Treasury facility). Treasury may collect these records in response to a health- related declaration of a national emergency by the President, a public health emergency declared by the Health and Human Service (HHS) Secretary or a designated federal official or a designated state official. Even in the absence of a health-related declaration of national emergency or declaration of public health emergency (HHS or state level), Treasury may collect these records if it determines that a significant risk of substantial harm exists to the health of Treasury personnel or visitors.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Federal Register announces a new initiative by the Department of the Treasury to establish a system for collecting health screening and contact tracing records. This system is designed to monitor and control the spread of communicable diseases within Treasury facilities and events. The intention is to protect the health of Treasury employees, visitors, and other stakeholders by ensuring compliance with health and safety regulations, especially in response to national or public health emergencies.
General Summary
This document outlines the establishment of a health monitoring system by the Treasury Department under the authority of the Privacy Act of 1974. The proposed system will track individuals who may have been exposed to infectious diseases either while working in or visiting Treasury facilities. Treasury intends to capture this data to help curb the spread of diseases and to adhere to legal health and safety mandates. While aiming to safeguard public and employee health, the system will manage personally identifiable information, including sensitive health data, under strict privacy safeguards.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several concerns arise from the document:
Financial Transparency: The document lacks information on the budget or financial resources needed to implement this system. Without clarity on funding, it becomes challenging to address concerns around potential waste or mismanagement of resources.
Complexity and Accessibility: The technical jargon and legal references throughout the document present a barrier to understanding for individuals without specialized legal knowledge. Simplifying these aspects could aid in wider public comprehension.
Legal Ambiguity: There is ambiguity surrounding the laws under which personal data may be shared. While the document asserts that sharing must be "allowed by law," it does not explicitly define these laws, leaving room for interpretation.
Data Security: While the document mentions that data will be safeguarded according to existing laws and policies, it does not specifically detail the security measures, which would provide greater assurance of data protection.
Retention and Disposal Practices: The document briefly mentions record retention and disposal but lacks specifics about timeframes and secure disposal processes, which are critical for maintaining data privacy.
Broad Information Sharing: The potential for record sharing with various federal, state, local, and foreign entities raises privacy concerns. A more precisely defined framework for information sharing could enhance individual privacy assurances.
Lack of Oversight: The absence of defined performance metrics or independent oversight could affect accountability and transparency in the program's effectiveness.
Public Impact
The establishment of this records system has the potential to significantly impact the public at large by enhancing public health measures. Controlling the spread of infectious diseases can reduce illness and related economic impacts. However, the potential mismanagement of personal health data and insufficient transparency could erode public trust.
Impact on Stakeholders
Treasury Personnel and Visitors: These groups stand to gain greater protection against communicable diseases due to timely health screenings and contact tracing. Nevertheless, there could be concerns regarding potential privacy risks and unauthorized use of personal data.
Healthcare and Public Health Authorities: Collaborative efforts with this system can strengthen public health initiatives and provide critical data during health emergencies.
Wider Community: While the community benefits from stronger public health safeguards, individuals may express apprehension over data privacy and monitoring.
In summary, while the Treasury's new records system aims to protect public health, ensuring clear communication, financial transparency, and robust data protection practices is essential to fully realize its benefits and maintain public trust.
Issues
• The document involves the establishment of a new system for collecting health and contact tracing records by the Treasury Department; however, there is no specific mention of the budget or financial resources allocated for its implementation. This lack of financial transparency makes it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.
• The language used in the document is quite technical and legalistic in nature, particularly the sections detailing the authorities for maintenance of the system and the routine uses of records. This could be difficult for the average reader to fully understand without legal expertise.
• The document mentions that personal information will not be shared unless allowed by law but does not specify what constitutes such a law, leaving room for ambiguity regarding the circumstances under which personal information may actually be disclosed.
• There is a lack of detailed information on how data collected will be safeguarded beyond general statements about compliance with laws and policies. More specific detail on the security measures would provide clearer assurance of data protection.
• The policies and practices for the retention and disposal of records are briefly outlined but lack specificity about the time frames for the retention and the processes for ensuring secure disposal.
• The document indicates records could be shared with a broad range of federal, state, local, and foreign agencies, potentially leading to privacy concerns. A more narrowed definition of when sharing is appropriate could provide more privacy assurance to individuals.
• No specific performance metrics or independent oversight measures are mentioned to monitor the effectiveness and compliance of the contact tracing system, which could be a governance issue.