FR 2021-03732

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activity: Supporting Statement Regarding Marriage

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) wants to know what people think about a form they use to check if two people living as if they're married really are, so they can give them benefits; they're asking if it's important and how they can make it better.

Summary AI

The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs is seeking public comment on a proposed information collection related to common-law marriage validations. This process is guided by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which requires federal agencies to announce and allow public review of information collection efforts. The specific form involved is VA Form 21P-4171, which helps the VBA assess the validity of claimed common-law marriages to determine eligibility for benefits. Comments are invited on whether the information collection is necessary, the estimated burden on respondents, and ways to improve the process.

Abstract

Veteran's Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of a currently approved collection, and allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 11385
Document #: 2021-03732
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 11385-11385

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a notice from the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The notice invites public comment on a proposed collection of information regarding common-law marriages. Specifically, this information is gathered using VA Form 21P-4171, which helps the VBA validate claims of common-law marriages. This validation is essential for determining eligibility for veterans' benefits. The initiative is underscored by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, mandating federal transparency and public involvement in information collection processes. Comments are sought on key aspects, such as the necessity of this information collection, its estimated burden on respondents, and possible improvements.

General Summary

The document is fundamentally about ensuring that the processes for collecting information about common-law marriages are thorough and justified. This involves an assessment of whether collecting this information is necessary and beneficial for the functions of the VBA. The notice also explores the practicality and efficiency of current methods, inviting public input for potential enhancements.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise upon scrutinizing the notice:

  1. Lack of Cost Details: The document does not provide detailed information on the financial aspects involved in collecting this data. This omission leaves unanswered questions about whether the process is economically efficient or if it carries potential wasteful spending.

  2. Complex Language: The use of legal and procedural terms without explanation could alienate or confuse individuals unfamiliar with such terminology. For example, references to "38 U.S.C. 5101(a)" and "VA Form 21P-4171" are made without adequate description.

  3. Ambiguities: Phrases such as "claim in the form provided by the Secretary" might be vague to the uninitiated, who may not understand what the specific form requires. Additionally, the notion of a "third party" in the context of information collection could be clarified to better inform respondents.

  4. Public Engagement: There is no explicit mention of what the agency intends to do with the public comments submitted. Clear intentions regarding how feedback will be used could foster a stronger sense of public involvement and transparency.

Public Impact

The proposed information collection could broadly impact veterans and their families who assert common-law marriage status to access benefits. It emphasizes verifying marriages to ensure the appropriate dispensation of benefits, which can both uphold integrity within veteran services and support entitled beneficiaries. However, without taking into account efficiency or potential administrative burdens, there could be unintended delays or complications in providing timely benefits.

Impact on Stakeholders

For veterans, service members, and their families, this initiative could positively ensure that benefits are appropriately distributed to legitimate claimants. However, if the collection process proves unnecessarily cumbersome or time-consuming, it may inadvertently impede those entitled to benefits.

From the agency's perspective, amplifying the adherence to legal standards and ensuring the provision of benefits can be seen positively. Yet, the lack of addressed efficiency and cost-control measures might present challenges in justifying the resources allocated towards this information collection.

In conclusion, while the intention behind the document appears well-meaning—aimed at validating common-law marriages for veteran benefits—there appears to be room for improvement in the areas of communication clarity, financial transparency, and defining the use of public input. These considerations are crucial for enhancing effectiveness and engagement in the policy-making process.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information on the cost involved in the collection of information, which could identify potential wasteful spending.

  • • There is no mention of specific oversight or efficiency measures to ensure that the information collection process is cost-effective.

  • • The document uses technical terms such as '38 U.S.C. 5101(a)' and 'VA Form 21P-4171' without providing a brief explanation, which could be overly complex for individuals not familiar with VA or legal terms.

  • • The phrase 'claim in the form provided by the Secretary' could be ambiguous without context on what the specific form entails.

  • • The document should clarify what constitutes a 'third party' in the context of collecting information about common-law marriages.

  • • There is no explicit mention of how the VA plans to use any public comments received in response to the notice, which could help clarify public engagement efforts.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 777
Sentences: 29
Entities: 67

Language

Nouns: 268
Verbs: 62
Adjectives: 16
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 38

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.30
Average Sentence Length:
26.79
Token Entropy:
5.04
Readability (ARI):
20.28

Reading Time

about 2 minutes