FR 2021-03693

The document from the Federal Register discusses the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's decision to withdraw the public review period and virtual public hearings related to the proposed Cook Inlet Lease Sale 258. This decision was made following Executive Order 14008, which calls for a pause on new oil and gas leasing on public lands and waters to allow for a comprehensive review of federal oil and gas activities. Consequently, previously scheduled events for public engagement, including a comment period and virtual hearings set for February 9-11, 2021, have been canceled.

Summary of the Document

The notice, published by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), announces the immediate cancellation of the public review procedures for Cook Inlet Lease Sale 258. This decision aligns with Executive Order 14008, aiming to pause new oil and gas leasing to evaluate environmental and climate impacts. The action was taken to avoid incurring administrative costs associated with conducting hearings while the area is under review. The document also states that stakeholders will be informed through the Federal Register if BOEM resumes its environmental review after the mandated comprehensive review is completed.

Significant Issues and Concerns

While the document addresses the withdrawal of the public review period, several issues remain unaddressed:

1. Lack of Detailed Justification: The document mentions administrative cost savings as a reason for the withdrawal but does not specify the extent of these savings. This leaves unanswered questions about the financial rationale behind the decision.

2. Absence of Impact Analysis: Although the decision is described as consistent with Executive Order 14008, the document does not elaborate on how the withdrawal of the review period directly relates to the order's findings or objectives apart from general compliance.

3. Unclear Future Steps: There is uncertainty regarding what happens after the review mandated by the executive order. Stakeholders are left without a clear timeline or understanding of future processes related to the proposed lease sale.

4. Complex Language: The document uses specialized terms like 'NOA', 'DEIS', and legal references that may not be easily understandable to those without expertise in environmental law or regulatory processes.

Impact on the Public

The withdrawal could have varying impacts on the general public, primarily concerning environmental protection and economic opportunities. The focus on conducting a detailed review ensures that any environmental repercussions are thoroughly considered, potentially benefiting the environment and communities concerned about ecological preservation. On the other hand, delays in leasing can impact industries reliant on oil and gas developments, potentially affecting jobs and local economies dependent on such activities.

Impact on Stakeholders

• Environmental Advocates: This decision is likely seen as beneficial by groups focused on environmental conservation and mitigating climate change impacts. It aligns with broader efforts to reassess the balance between resource development and environmental stewardship.

• Oil and Gas Industry: For stakeholders in the energy sector, the pause on leasing may be perceived negatively, as it introduces delays and uncertainty in future operations and investments. These impacts could ripple through to supply chains and labor markets connected to energy projects.

• Local Communities: The impact on local communities may be mixed. While some may welcome the environmental review and potential safeguards against ecological harm, others might be concerned about economic implications stemming from delays in leasing activities.

In conclusion, while the document outlines an important regulatory shift in response to federal directives, it leaves several questions unanswered regarding its full implications and future directions. Stakeholders will need to stay informed through subsequent communications and updates as the review process unfolds.