FR 2021-03674

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings #1

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is letting people know about changes to how much money electric companies can charge. They are asking people who have thoughts about this to tell them, but some dates seem wrong, like saying something will happen in the year 9998, which is really far away.

Summary AI

In this notice, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announces receipt of several electric rate filings from various applicants like Union Electric Company, NedPower Mount Storm, LLC, and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. These filings involve amendments to tariffs and rate changes intended to be effective in the future, with details available by querying the specified docket numbers in FERC's eLibrary system. The notice invites people to submit their comments, interventions, or protests by the given deadlines to be part of the proceedings. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., the Deputy Secretary, signed the notice on February 17, 2021.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 10947
Document #: 2021-03674
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 10947-10947

AnalysisAI

In a recent notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), a series of electric rate filings by several applicants have been announced. Among the entities filing are the Union Electric Company, NedPower Mount Storm, LLC, and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., each submitting documents pertaining to tariff amendments or rate modifications. This document provides the public with an opportunity to review and comment on these filings through FERC's eLibrary system and emphasizes the importance of intervention to become an official party in the proceedings.

General Summary

The notice essentially functions as an announcement of received filings concerning various amendments to electric rates and tariffs. These filings include specific details such as docket numbers and effective dates, allowing stakeholders and interested parties to access more detailed information through FERC's online resources. The document also outlines the process for interested parties to submit comments, interventions, or protests, emphasizing the role of public participation in regulatory affairs.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from the review of this document. Notably, there is a recurring mention of an effective date, December 31, 9998, for certain filings, which clearly appears to be a placeholder or typographical error rather than a legitimate date. This unusual date may cause confusion and casts doubt on the accuracy or completeness of the document. Moreover, the document relies heavily on technical jargon and specific regulatory terms without additional explanation, posing a barrier to understanding for those unfamiliar with the intricacies of regulatory processes. This includes references to sections of the PJM Tariff and § 205(d) Rate Filings, which require further context to be accessible to a general audience.

Public Impact

For the general public, the direct impact of these filings might be limited unless individuals have a stake in the proceedings or are consumers of the specific energy resources affected. However, the broader implications are linked to the transparency and adjustments in energy rates or infrastructure that could eventually affect electric utility costs or reliability. Such filings could potentially influence the operational efficiency of energy markets and the service delivery capabilities of involved companies.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The notice largely pertains to stakeholders within the energy sector. Companies involved, like Union Electric Company and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., may experience direct effects on their operations and financial planning based on the outcomes of these filings. Understanding and engaging in the proceedings is crucial for them to protect their interests and advocate for favorable outcomes. Moreover, regulators, utility companies, and energy consumers who are more directly engaged in the industry will need to follow these developments closely to anticipate changes in regulations that may impact strategic decisions or policy advocacy.

In conclusion, while the document serves as an important mechanism for regulatory transparency and public engagement, it would benefit from clearer communication, both in terms of technical explanation and rectification of obvious placeholders or errors. Simplifying access to key information would enhance public understanding and foster greater participation in regulatory processes.

Issues

  • • Several filings mention an effective date of 12/31/9998, which seems like a placeholder or error, as it is far in the future and not a realistic date.

  • • The purpose or impact of each filing is not clearly explained, making it difficult to assess their importance or potential impact.

  • • The document contains numerous technical terms and references to specific regulatory filings (e.g., § 205(d) Rate Filing) without explanation, which could be difficult for a general audience to understand.

  • • The language suggesting that intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding might be unclear to those unfamiliar with regulatory processes.

  • • Repeated reference to various docket numbers and accession numbers could be confusing without clear context or explanation for their significance.

  • • The guidance for eFiling and contacting for further information could be consolidated and simplified for better clarity.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 893
Sentences: 56
Entities: 118

Language

Nouns: 305
Verbs: 29
Adjectives: 16
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 119

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.00
Average Sentence Length:
15.95
Token Entropy:
4.61
Readability (ARI):
17.32

Reading Time

about 3 minutes