FR 2021-03643

The Federal Register notice announces a public meeting hosted by the Pacific Fishery Management Council. The meeting focuses on the Ad Hoc Southern Oregon/Northern California Coast (SONCC) Coho Workgroup, and its primary objective is to discuss the risks associated with coho salmon populations in the specified regions and to consider possible strategies for managing these risks. Scheduled for March 25, 2021, the meeting will be conducted online, allowing broader public participation.

General Summary

The notice alerts the public to an upcoming meeting that aims to address the management and conservation of coho salmon populations on the coasts of Southern Oregon and Northern California. This meeting is part of a series of discussions intended to develop risk analysis models and explore potential strategies for sustainable harvest control. The meeting is open to the public, emphasizing transparency and opportunities for public engagement in the conservation process. Key details, such as contact information for Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt and Ms. Robin Ehlke, are provided to assist individuals interested in participating.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One of the notable issues is the lack of clarity regarding Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt’s role. The document provides his contact information for technical assistance but does not specify his responsibilities or authority related to the meeting, which could lead to confusion for those seeking more detailed assistance. Additionally, the legal reference to "16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq." is not elaborated on, potentially leaving readers unfamiliar with legal citations unsure of its implication. This could hinder a complete understanding of the regulatory framework governing the meeting and related actions.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the meeting represents a chance to engage with the ongoing management strategies for a critical natural resource. Coho salmon are not only significant ecologically but also economically for industries such as fishing and tourism. Public participation may increase community awareness and involvement in environmental sustainability efforts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impact

• Environmental Advocates: Those invested in conservation are likely to view the meeting positively as it represents progress in environmental stewardship. The focus on modeling and analysis could lead to more effective management strategies.
• Fisheries and Local Economies: By addressing risk management, these efforts may help ensure sustainable fish populations, which would benefit local fisheries economically in the long run. Stakeholders invested in the fishing industry may appreciate the proactive approach to managing coho populations.

Negative Impact

• Regulatory Challenges: Some stakeholders, particularly those in the commercial fishing sector, may see increased regulations and controls as potential obstacles to short-term business operations, especially if they result in stricter harvest limits.
• Complexity and Accessibility: For individuals with less access to technology or those unfamiliar with the procedures of online meetings, participation might be challenging. This situation may limit the feedback and engagement of certain community members.

In conclusion, while this document lays the foundation for public involvement in ecological management, clarity in the roles and legal references would enhance understanding and participation. The balance between conservation and economic impact remains the central theme, as stakeholders navigate the implications of these management discussions.