FR 2021-03640

Overview

Title

Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic; Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The folks who look after the fish in the sea are having an online meeting to talk about how many scamp groupers, a type of fish, live in some big ocean areas. They'll use information from past meetings to decide the best ways to count and protect these fish.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are holding a third assessment webinar for the Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) 68 process. This process focuses on evaluating the population status and management of the scamp grouper in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic. The webinar will take place on March 22, 2021, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Eastern Time. Participants will discuss and recommend methods for assessing the fish stock using data gathered in previous webinars.

Abstract

The SEDAR 68 assessment process of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic scamp will consist of a series of data and assessment webinars, and a Review Workshop. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 10936
Document #: 2021-03640
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 10936-10936

AnalysisAI

The document pertains to a notice from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) regarding a webinar for the Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) process. This specific session, termed Webinar III, is part of a series focused on assessing the population health and management status of the scamp grouper fish in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic regions. The scheduled webinar is to occur on March 22, 2021, and is open to public participation, subject to prior registration details being followed.

Summary of the Document

The core purpose of the document is to inform interested parties about the upcoming status assessment meeting for the scamp grouper species. This is achieved through a structured process designed to analyze collected data, apply assessment models, and project future conditions regarding the fisheries. The aim is to better understand the current state of this fish population and to make informed decisions about future management strategies. Participants in these webinars include a range of stakeholders, such as data scientists, fishery managers, and constituency representatives, reflecting the collaborative approach taken.

Significant Issues

The document presents several areas of concern. Notably, the technical language may prove challenging for those who lack expertise in this field. Terms like "biological benchmarks" and "population parameters" might be difficult for general readers to fully grasp. Additionally, the document lacks specific details about how the issues discussed in this process will directly influence policy or management beyond acknowledging the multi-step procedural nature of the meetings.

Another area of concern involves the lack of clarity regarding accommodations for people with disabilities. Though the document mentions these provisions, it falls short of providing explicit contact details or procedures for making such requests. This omission could lead to unnecessary confusion or exclusionary practices.

Furthermore, while the document notes that non-emergency issues might arise during the webinar, it does not provide specifics on what these issues could be or how they will be addressed. This leaves room for ambiguity and raises questions about transparency, particularly concerning decisions made post-publication under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Public Impact

For the general public, the document signifies a step in maintaining ecological and economic sustainability within regional fisheries. It underscores the methodical approach taken by federal agencies to oversee and manage fish stocks, which are crucial for maintaining biodiversity and supporting the livelihoods of those reliant on fishing industries.

Impact on Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:
Stakeholders, such as commercial fishermen, environmentalists, and local communities, may benefit from the thorough data-driven evaluations conducted during these webinars. By adopting approaches that are more aligned with scientific assessments, the actions stemming from these discussions could result in better-managed fish populations and more sustainable fishing practices.

Negative Impacts:
Conversely, without a clear understanding of the processes involved and the potential outcomes, other stakeholders might feel excluded or inadequately informed. This situation could weaken trust in the managing bodies and foster resistance to any new regulations or management measures proposed thereafter.

In conclusion, while the SEDAR process represents a significant effort to ensure sustainable fishery practices, the communication around this particular meeting could be enhanced by providing clearer, more accessible information and addressing certain ambiguities to better serve all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify any financial implications or spending details, making it difficult to assess wastefulness or favoritism.

  • • The metadata and text do not provide full clarity on how the assessment affects the management of fisheries beyond the immediate procedural process.

  • • The language used in describing the SEDAR process, such as 'biological benchmarks,' 'assessment models,' and 'population parameters,' might be overly complex for laypersons without technical expertise.

  • • Instructions for requesting accommodations for people with disabilities are mentioned, but no specific contact details or procedures are provided, which could lead to ambiguity.

  • • The term 'SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION' in the summary section indicates additional details which were not provided, potentially leading to incomplete understanding.

  • • The mention of 'non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda' suggests potential discussions, but gives no clarity on what these issues might be or how they will be handled.

  • • The announcement allows for emergency actions under the Magnuson-Stevens Act post-publication without detailing how public notification will occur, which could be concerning for transparency.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 770
Sentences: 29
Entities: 61

Language

Nouns: 307
Verbs: 53
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.26
Average Sentence Length:
26.55
Token Entropy:
5.19
Readability (ARI):
20.16

Reading Time

about 2 minutes