FR 2021-03565

Overview

Title

Airworthiness Directives; MHI RJ Aviation ULC (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FAA is making some airplane companies check and fix parts of the landing gear on certain planes because they might not last as long as they should, which could be dangerous. They need to look at the airplane's records and possibly change out some old parts to keep everyone safe.

Summary AI

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model CL-600-2B19 airplanes, responding to issues with the structural life limits of some landing gear components. These limits were not properly updated during repairs, potentially leading to landing gear collapse and resulting in airplane damage and danger to passengers. The directive requires checking and revising these limits in airplane documents and replacing affected parts when necessary. This rule is to ensure the safe operation of the aircraft and is effective from March 30, 2021.

Abstract

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain MHI RJ Aviation ULC Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. This AD was prompted by evidence that a revised structural life limit of some components of the nose landing gear (NLG) and/or main landing gear (MLG) was not implemented during repair. This AD requires verifying that the affected components are installed on the airplane, revising the structural life limits in the existing structural deviation inspection requirements (SDIR) airplane document, and replacing affected components if necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Type: Rule
Citation: 86 FR 10753
Document #: 2021-03565
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 10753-10767

AnalysisAI

The document under review is a rule from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which pertains to airworthiness directives for specific models of MHI RJ Aviation ULC airplanes, previously associated with Bombardier, Inc. This directive aims to address issues related to structural life limits of certain components in the landing gear, which were not properly updated after repairs. This oversight could potentially lead to landing gear collapse, causing significant safety risks.

General Summary

This FAA directive mandates inspections and updates to structural life limits for components of the landing gear on particular aircraft models. If necessary, it also requires the replacement of affected parts. The rules apply to models registered within the U.S., with an effective date of March 30, 2021. This measure is a response to an airworthiness issue identified in collaboration with the Canadian aviation authority, emphasizing international cooperation in aviation safety.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document highlights the lack of detailed cost estimation data for airlines or operators to comply with the directive, which might create uncertainty regarding economic impact. Additionally, it includes technical terminologies like "SDIR", "NLG", and "MLG," which might not be readily understood by individuals unfamiliar with aviation. Moreover, references to figures that are not part of the provided text create barriers to understanding the complete scope of the directive.

Furthermore, there is minimal guidance on accessing the referenced Bombardier Service Bulletin, which could be crucial for compliance. Contact information is dispersed across the document, potentially complicating straightforward access to additional required documents or support.

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, this regulatory change underscores a commitment to ensuring aviation safety. The directive reduces the risk of in-flight incidents that could have severe repercussions on passenger safety, thereby enhancing consumer confidence in air travel. This move reflects the broader public interest in maintaining high safety standards in the aviation industry.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For airlines and aircraft operators, compliance with this directive means additional operational checks and potential component replacements, which could be financially and logistically burdensome. However, ensuring these requirements are met also promises long-term safety and reliability enhancements, mitigating the risk of costly accidents or regulatory penalties.

Manufacturers, such as MHI RJ Aviation and related component suppliers, may also experience shifts in demand for their parts and services, either from replacement needs or verification procedures. Additionally, repair shops and maintenance teams could see an uptick in required services, though this might press already stretched resources.

In summary, while the directive proposes necessary safety measures, the potential logistical and financial implications warrant attention to ensure there are adequate resources and strategies in place for successful implementation while minimizing strain on operators.

Issues

  • • The document does not contain information about the financial impact or cost estimates for individual operators to comply with the AD, which might be useful for understanding the economic burden of compliance.

  • • Some technical terms and references, such as 'SDIR', 'NLG', 'MLG', and 'MCAI', may not be easily understood by individuals without specific aviation knowledge.

  • • The document references figures (e.g., 'figure 1 to paragraph (h)') that are not included in the text, making it difficult to verify details without access to the original figures.

  • • While the document mentions a Service Bulletin from Bombardier, details on how to access this document might be insufficient for those unfamiliar with aviation industry practices.

  • • The contact information for obtaining further details or documents is scattered throughout, which may hinder easy access and consultation for the reader.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 15
Words: 2,973
Sentences: 85
Entities: 303

Language

Nouns: 1,022
Verbs: 214
Adjectives: 118
Adverbs: 22
Numbers: 207

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.72
Average Sentence Length:
34.98
Token Entropy:
5.62
Readability (ARI):
21.66

Reading Time

about 11 minutes