FR 2021-03512

Overview

Title

Certain Activated Carbon From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Final Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2018-2019

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government found that two companies from China sold a product called activated carbon to America at cheaper prices than they should have during a specific time. Because of this, they now have to pay extra money, called duties, to make up for that, and other companies have to follow new rules to ensure proper payment in the future.

Summary AI

The Department of Commerce has determined that two companies in China, Carbon Activated Tianjin Co., Ltd. and Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd., sold activated carbon in the U.S. at prices below normal value during 2018-2019. As a result, these companies, along with others eligible for separate rates, will face adjusted antidumping duties. The agency confirmed which companies did not ship any goods during this period and reassigned some to the China-wide entity for duty assessment. The review concluded with updated cash deposit requirements for future shipments to ensure proper duties are collected.

Abstract

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Carbon Activated Tianjin Co., Ltd. (Carbon Activated) and Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (Datong Juqiang) sold certain activated carbon from the People's Republic of China (China) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2018, through March 31, 2019.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 10539
Document #: 2021-03512
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 10539-10542

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register outlines the final results of an antidumping duty administrative review conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce regarding activated carbon imported from the People's Republic of China for the year 2018-2019. The review concluded that certain companies, specifically Carbon Activated Tianjin Co., Ltd. and Datong Juqiang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd., sold their products in the United States at prices below the normal value, triggering the imposition of adjusted antidumping duties. These determinations directly impact both the involved companies and broader trade practices between the U.S. and China regarding these goods.

General Summary

The document reports on the findings of an antidumping review process undertaken to evaluate whether certain Chinese companies were selling activated carbon in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. The investigation concluded with the imposition of adjusted antidumping duties on the identified companies. Additionally, the review clarified which companies had no shipments during the period of review, reaffirming eligibility for separate rate treatment and the implications of being included in the "China-wide entity."

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the main issues with this document is its technical complexity, filled with dense legal language that might be difficult for those outside of international trade law to fully comprehend. References to a variety of memorandums and prior documents without detailed summaries can complicate the understanding of the context, resulting in a lack of transparency.

There is an absence of a clear, standalone explanation regarding the implications and responsibilities that come with being categorized as part of the "China-wide entity," potentially leading to confusion among affected businesses. Furthermore, the methodology behind determining the rates for non-examined, separate rate respondents is not described in detail, raising concerns about the fairness and transparency of the process.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document might appear esoteric but holds relevance in terms of fair trade practices and consumer protection. Antidumping duties aim to level the playing field by ensuring that foreign producers do not undercut domestic markets with unfair pricing, a practice that could threaten domestic industries and jobs. Therefore, these reviews play a crucial role in maintaining competitive markets.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Chinese Companies:

The companies identified as having sold below normal value will face increased costs due to the new antidumping duties, which might affect their pricing strategies and competitive position in the U.S market. Those companies identified as part of the "China-wide entity" potentially face even higher duties, impacting their ability to compete with companies that received separate rates.

For U.S. Importers and the Supply Chain:

Importers of activated carbon may see price increases due to these duties, which might be passed along the supply chain, potentially affecting prices for consumers or the availability of these goods.

For Regulatory and Trade Organizations:

This decision reinforces the importance of following prescribed trade laws and regulations. It also highlights potential areas for improvement in transparency and simplification of documentation, which could aid compliance and understanding for all stakeholders involved.

While this document underscores important measures taken to enforce fair trade, it also reveals opportunities for clearer communication and improved transparency in such regulatory actions.

Issues

  • • The document is highly technical, filled with complex legal and compliance language that may not be easily understood by individuals without a background in international trade law or administrative reviews.

  • • The document references numerous memoranda and prior notices without providing sufficient summaries, which might require readers to access multiple documents to fully understand the context, potentially complicating compliance and transparency.

  • • There is no clear explanation of the implications of being part of the 'China-wide entity' for the listed companies, which could lead to confusion regarding the practical outcomes of being categorized as such.

  • • The methodology for calculating the separate rate for non-examined, separate rate respondents is not explained in detail, potentially leading to confusion or allegations of unfairness.

  • • The notice on the responsibilities related to Administrative Protective Order (APO) and reimbursement of duties is detailed, but the consequences of non-compliance are only briefly mentioned, which might not sufficiently emphasize their seriousness.

  • • The document does not mention any specific actions or policy changes aimed at improving the transparency or efficiency of the antidumping review process, which could be viewed as a missed opportunity for systemic improvement.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 4
Words: 4,294
Sentences: 176
Entities: 405

Language

Nouns: 1,579
Verbs: 230
Adjectives: 210
Adverbs: 67
Numbers: 251

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.71
Average Sentence Length:
24.40
Token Entropy:
5.73
Readability (ARI):
21.05

Reading Time

about 16 minutes