Overview
Title
Softwood Lumber Research, Promotion, Consumer Education and Industry Information Order; Assessment Rate Increase
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The people in charge have decided to ask lumber companies to pay a little more money, $0.41 instead of $0.35, for every thousand pieces of wood they sell, to help them do more cool stuff like promoting wood and educating people about it. This change is like a group of grown-ups making a plan to save and spend their extra allowance wisely for fun and important activities.
Summary AI
The Softwood Lumber Research, Promotion, Consumer Education and Industry Information Order has been amended to increase the assessment rate from $0.35 to $0.41 per thousand board feet. This rule is administered by the Softwood Lumber Board under the oversight of the Agricultural Marketing Service of the USDA. The additional funds will support ongoing and new initiatives to promote softwood lumber. This change follows the review of past expenditures and revenues and aims to support the lumber industry's growth, addressing both current challenges and new opportunities.
Abstract
This rule amends the Softwood Lumber Research, Promotion, Consumer Education and Industry Information Order (Order) to increase the assessment rate from $0.35 to $0.41 per thousand board feet (mbf). The Order is administered by the Softwood Lumber Board (Board) with oversight by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). This rule will also add the conversion factor for square meters to board feet and makes one conforming change.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document details a regulatory change to the Softwood Lumber Research, Promotion, Consumer Education and Industry Information Order, specifically increasing the assessment rate from $0.35 to $0.41 per thousand board feet. This order is managed by the Softwood Lumber Board with oversight by the USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service. The main objective behind this amendment is to generate additional funds to sustain existing initiatives and embark on new projects aimed at bolstering the softwood lumber industry. It comes after an evaluation of historical spending and income, alongside considerations of market growth opportunities and challenges.
General Summary
The rule modifies the assessment rate—a sort of levy collected from softwood lumber producers and importers—to nourish programs that support the industry. The increased funding is intended to help not only maintain existing promotional and educational programs but also support new ventures. This change reflects an analysis of past financial performance and anticipates addressing emergent industry opportunities.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One of the chief concerns is the potential financial strain on small entities resulting from the rate hike. Although described as minor, any increase in operational costs can disproportionately affect smaller businesses. The rule also doesn't elaborate on whether alternative funding strategies or expense reductions were deeply considered before opting for this rate increase. Additionally, some commenters questioned the necessity of the increase, particularly given the current high demand and pricing in the lumber market. The document does not provide a detailed counter-argument to these critiques.
The technical language used in the document could be another issue, making it difficult for individuals without industry knowledge to fully grasp the implications. Terms like 'mbf', 'bbf', and others require additional clarification for general understanding.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, the impact may not be immediately noticeable, but indirectly, changes like these could affect prices of products derived from softwood lumber. Any significant shift in costs or market demand could trickle down to consumer prices for items like furniture, building materials, and other wood-based products.
Impact on Stakeholders
Small Entities: Smaller businesses might feel the pinch of increased assessments, and there's a concern over whether the additional costs will truly be balanced by the anticipated benefits. Transparent communication of demonstrable benefits could mitigate some of this impact.
Broader Industry: In the longer view, the increased funding has the potential to strengthen the industry by expanding market reach and encouraging innovation. Investing in educational initiatives and technical support could lead to more sustainable and diverse market applications.
USDA and Regulatory Bodies: There's an implicit duty to ensure that changes address a dynamic balance, fostering growth without unfair financial burdens. The decision to increase assessments must convincingly demonstrate that benefits outweigh costs.
Overall, while the rule is designed to promote a broader growth strategy, ensuring equitable impact across all business scales within the industry is paramount. Continuous oversight and periodic reviews will be essential in assessing the tangible outcomes of this funding increase.
Financial Assessment
The document introduces an amendment to the Softwood Lumber Research, Promotion, Consumer Education, and Industry Information Order, increasing the assessment rate. The previous rate of $0.35 per thousand board feet (mbf) is increased to $0.41 per mbf. This adjustment indicates a marginal increase in the costs that domestic manufacturers and importers must pay. However, the additional funds are intended to support both existing and new programs aimed at maintaining and expanding markets for softwood lumber.
The increase in the assessment is described as minimal, representing a rise from 0.1% to 0.12% of the 2019 average framing lumber composite price of $356 per mbf. While seemingly minor, the minimal increase could still have a notable financial impact, particularly on smaller entities. The document identifies small agricultural service firms as those with annual receipts of no more than $8 million, equating to a maximum threshold of 22.5 million board feet (mmbf) per year to qualify as small. The Small Business Administration (SBA) uses this metric to determine entity size.
The financial implications for smaller businesses are further explored, suggesting the cost increase could be counterbalanced by potential benefits from the additional funding of the Board's programs. Nevertheless, the document lacks a clear analysis demonstrating how these benefits could effectively offset the new costs, raising some concerns.
Spending on various initiatives is also discussed, with program expenditures averaging $12.96 million annually from 2014 to 2018. The funds are allocated to research on wood standards, communications programs, and construction and design support. The increased assessment rate aims to bolster funding for these initiatives and tackle newer challenges, such as promoting softwood lumber in non-traditional markets like tall wood buildings.
Concerns have been raised by some stakeholders questioning the necessity of increasing the assessment rate, given the record demand and high prices for softwood lumber. Despite these concerns, the board maintains that the increased assessment rate is essential to avoid hindering growth and to address the Board’s ability to meet existing and emerging market opportunities.
Moreover, the document mentions an overall favorable assessment of the Board's program efficiency, noting an impressive return on investment— more than $15 and later $23 in increased sales per $1 spent on promotion—though this does not directly resolve the concerns regarding the impact on small entities or provide specific projections under varying market conditions.
The financial references within this document highlight a necessary balance between maintaining industry growth through increased funding and ensuring the financial burden is manageable for small businesses. However, a more detailed allocation plan or strategic impact projection could provide greater transparency and understanding of the benefits derived from the increased rates.
Issues
• The increase in the assessment rate from $0.35 to $0.41 per mbf may impose additional financial burdens on small entities. Although the impact is described as minimal, it is important to ensure that small entities are not disproportionately affected.
• The document mentions that the increase in the assessment rate was discussed and recommended by the Board, but does not provide detailed insights into whether alternative funding sources or cost-cutting strategies were explored in depth prior to deciding on the rate increase.
• The document uses technical terms and abbreviations (e.g., 'mbf', 'bbf', 'm3', 'm2') that could be difficult for a layperson to understand without additional context or explanation.
• While the rule provides figures on expenditures and assessment income, it lacks a detailed breakdown of how exactly the additional funds from the increased assessment rate will be allocated to specific projects or initiatives.
• The response to the comments indicates that some commenters suggested that the current high demand and prices for softwood lumber might not necessitate an increase in assessment. However, the document does not address these concerns in detail or explore if this viewpoint holds merit under current or projected market conditions.
• The explanation of the calculation method for determining small entities might be seen as complex, particularly with the conversion from framing lumber composite price to board feet thresholds for defining small businesses.
• There is an assumption that the benefits from the increased assessment rate will offset the cost to manufacturers and importers, but the document does not provide concrete evidence or projections supporting this claim.